Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
01-18-2004, 06:38 PM | #1 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
More pep for a Ford 3.0 V6?
Hey guys, My buddies dad has a ranger with a 3 liter 6 and he's looking for some extra power. I don't picture him as the crazy 12 second 1/4 type, I think he's just looking for a bit more thump (about the same as a stock 5.0). He said no motor swaps so what should I tell him to do? I'm thinking throttle body, injectors, intake and exhaust to start. What do you think?
|
|
01-18-2004, 06:50 PM | #2 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: More pep for a Ford 3.0 V6?
Well a Super charger will probably be his best beat.
__________________
Lindsey Boost Enhancer, Blitz EBC, Hot Air Intake, Koni Yellows |
|
01-19-2004, 03:10 AM | #3 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 734
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: More pep for a Ford 3.0 V6?
Or put a stick of TNT on the back of the can and see if that gives him an added "thump"
But seriously, a supercharger sounds like the most reasonable to me as well. |
|
01-19-2004, 02:18 PM | #4 | |
AF Fanatic
|
try NAAAAWZ j/p but yea super sounds good look around for ur best taste
__________________
- Its Micheal Jackson! and his black again!!! YAY!!!!!! LandoAWD - My rolemodel!! why? because his a bad ass! beache..! and he will kick ur A$$!! Originally Posted by Delerious93integra and if DSM's are so great.. then why doesn't everyone own one? ^^^ WOW!!! ^^^ |
|
01-19-2004, 07:26 PM | #5 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Re: More pep for a Ford 3.0 V6?
for the 3.0, there's not much.
gibson exhaust, K&N or Volant or Airaid intake. why aren't you posting this in the ranger forum? b/c it's sure not related to street racing.. |
|
01-19-2004, 08:05 PM | #6 | ||
Yaya Master
|
Re: Re: More pep for a Ford 3.0 V6?
Quote:
if its the duratec V6 he has quite a few options as far as aftermarket goes. also i agree wrong forum.
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
||
01-19-2004, 08:21 PM | #7 | |
On Fire!
|
There... now we're in the right forum...
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
01-28-2004, 01:32 PM | #8 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
All of the 3.0 engines in rangers are the vulcan engines, which are base taurus engines mounted length wise. They are pushrodders, so they naturally make low hp and higher torque. What year is that ranger?? It could be a FFV (flex fuel vehicle) which with slight modification, can run on compressed natural gas. As for power, air filters and exhaust seem like the only inexpensive(relatively) options. A chip could also be a possibility.
|
|
03-23-2004, 10:19 PM | #9 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Matthews, North Carolina
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Here's the Supercharger
http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1206 Here's the best intake kit I've found by Street Smart Design. http://www.ssd4u.com/streetsmart_001.htm You can also get a lot more links and info from some Ford Ranger forums like www.rangerpowersports.com and www.generation-edge.com tons of members with unlimited info. Hope this helps a little. |
|
11-02-2004, 08:38 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: virginiabeach, Virginia
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: More pep for a Ford 3.0 V6?
dude, tell him to go get an intake from k&n, a catback exhaust,some good headers, and he could even put anew intake manifold on and add a turbo
|
|
11-04-2004, 11:58 AM | #11 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 434
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The super charge and turbo are very extreme and depending on the amount of PSI they put out, you're gonna need to put some really hard core internals in that 3.0. It should already be mass air flow, my 2.9 wasn't. I built my engine all in one swoop, but the 2.9 is competely different from the 3.0L.
Swapped the Speed Density ECU for a MAF ECU and rewired. I got a custom ground cam made, pace setter headers, dynomax super turbo dual exhaust muffler, and brand new heads milled .030". I also have an air adjuster to correctly set the a/f ration for the mis calibrated parts (3.8L MAF on a 2.9L). As of right now, it's pretty fast. My friend has a 4.6L and I am pretty sure this little V6 could smoke it. I had 19lbs injectors, but I was having problems when I just threw everything together. I switched back to the 14lbs. BIG Mistake. It needs more air, you can hear it sucking, sounds like it has turbo. Next project is to put on Bosche Design II (4 spayer) fuel injectors, 65mm T.B. and I already have a 65mm MAF to put on it. It has no low end torque, but once you hit 2,100 rpm you're gone. That's the design of the cam though. You can tell the fuel injectors are bottoming out at around 3,500 rpm because the air adjuster is set so rich. Right now it hits about 4,100 rpm before the tranny shifts (auto). It really screams. Once all my new mods are done, this little engine is gonna be tite. Hopefully I wont have to switch trannys soon. I might get a 5sp, but I've never owned/driven a clutch. Just remember, the turbo itself costs a lot $$$ as well as the injectors you'll need to power it... You'll need harder internals and lower compression ratio. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|