Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical > Forced Induction
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2006, 09:54 AM   #16
GreyGoose006
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 1,687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: new 911 turbos WTF

Quote:
Originally Posted by KiwiBacon
You've still got a lot of frictional loss there. Still spinning the turbo, still pumping air. Just letting the recirculated air go around in circles getting hotter and hotter.

Seamless transition would also be a major issue.
what if the turbo was set up to pump air into a tank, and did so all the time. when you punched the thottle a valve would release air from the tank. the tank could be cooled, and when the pressurized air was released, it would get cold.
you could have a midsize turbo that was just pumping away into a large tank, and air would be released only as needed. like having a power button, except it would be controled by throttle position.

am i crazy?
GreyGoose006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:37 PM   #17
SaabJohan
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Borlänge
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: new 911 turbos WTF

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyGoose006
what if the turbo was set up to pump air into a tank, and did so all the time. when you punched the thottle a valve would release air from the tank. the tank could be cooled, and when the pressurized air was released, it would get cold.
you could have a midsize turbo that was just pumping away into a large tank, and air would be released only as needed. like having a power button, except it would be controled by throttle position.

am i crazy?
WRC cars ran that solution for a few races (it was banned). But it was used to overcome the flow limit of the mandatory restrictor at full throttle, not to reduce turbo lag (as there is no turbo lag on a WRC car).

In a WRC car the turbochargers provides boost pressure all the time, even when engine engine is running with a closed throttle due to the anti lag system. So when the engine was off throttle, pressurized air from the turbo was fed to a large tank (Ford ran a tank made out of titanium sheets behind the rear bumper). When full throttle was applied, above the point where flow is limited by the restrictor, and when tank pressure is higher than plenum pressure, the tank supplies the engine with more air than can pass through the engine. That can result in perhaps 10-20 more hp as long there is an air supply.
SaabJohan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 05:43 PM   #18
GreyGoose006
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 1,687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: new 911 turbos WTF

the tank could be really big to prevent excess back pressure when the turbo started slowing down when the pressure built up. i think the ideal setup would be that it only released pressure at full throttle, or when you puched a button. you could get massive power gains though. you could easily use a small turbo and get like 30 psi boost.
GreyGoose006 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical > Forced Induction


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts