 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
10-18-2003, 07:28 PM
|
#16 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: louisville, ky
Posts: 556
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: B20 Vs H22
The 1988-91 preludes came stock with the first rendition of the b20. They were quick, but the motor was completely different. It was much lower compression, and totally different on the engineering, different cams, timing, everything. It is rated about 15hp less than the B20b or B20z that comes in the CRV. There's no comparison on the car either. Those preludes were pretty heavy, and didn't have great transmissions either.
I would definitely do the B20, since the H22 is just about undriveable in a 4th gen civic. I agree that there is just about no way to even make it fit. the block is huge on those. They are several inches taller than the b18's, meaning that it's going to hit on your radius rods, and probably your hood too when it rocks back. just save yourself the headache and get a b20 or b18.
__________________
Remember: You can't spell Crap without APC! Classic SE-R GTi-R turbo setup 3" DP U12 modified ECU Hyperco GenII suspension Progress sway SAFC etc. etc. |
|
|
|
|
10-18-2003, 08:09 PM
|
#17 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tillsonburg
Posts: 2,824
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: B20 Vs H22
Quote:
__________________
"The nympho of info, I'm fuckin' what ya heard" 
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
