WAR with Iraq (where to post this?)

[maxhogblom]

in what forums should this be in?

oh well....

war with Iraq started very early this morning. Only robot missiles have been fired so far, no ground troups have been sent in.

hmm, like Robin Cook said in his speech a couple of days ago, i think that there are some reasons that US/UK shouldnt be at war:
-Costs
-Only a few more months would have been needed for the weapons inspectors to finish. why couldnt they let them finish?
-why now? It has taken Iraq 12 years to comply and cooperate with the weapons inspectors, and the US/UK

However, on bush's side:
-Saddam continues to be a threat to all of his neighboring countries, and Iraqi people (however, i think that the weapons inspectors should have finished first)


Some general facts:
-Iraqi military troops- Low training, low motivation, and low to no income.
-Many Iraqi soldiers will give up
-Iraq has very bad military powers- trashed tanks from Russia (with low armor); also, very little air forces
-It will only take a few days to take out teh Iraq military
-mmm, ill say more later, dont have enough time to write everything b4 school..


so, whats your opinion?

[Vt Fusion]

Try 'coffee break' off-tpoic..

anyway on many forums this has caused alot of conflict, war threads i mean, so ima just going to stay out of it.

[GTi-VR6_A3]

better to keep cars to cars and politics to off topic. i in no way let either places influence each other and thats the best way to keep it...

-GTi-VR6_A3

[Zammo]

this is a messy issue

there r so many more for aand againsts

any way hes gotta go (SH)

IRAQ has not complied with dissarmament

no one knows what they have except them selves

they are highly educated and have lots of motivation

hell agriculture writing all sorts of stuff began there its 7000 yo + civilisation

the ones in power have lots of funding + no rules to abide buy but pale ibn comparison to the US war machine and for that matter the whole coalition


point : left wing fruitcake retards that r there and here (and everywhere) saying ohh no lives should be lost saddam and this could of been solved are Fu*^ heads HE is a threat to all humanity

these ppl say he can be watched PAH

say hitler to them and there like "OHHHHH he was so BAD but not saddam"

sadam has opressed his ppl since he was in power killed millions of his own let alone others

get with the program ppl this needs to happen (shoulda happend 12 years ago

granted sanctions havnt helped ppl of iraq neither has the UN (with all their pussy footing around)

To all the ppl that oppose this war

GO LAY IN FRONT OF A TANK U FU*&ING MORONS

good on BUSH & USA for finally taking action

good on John Howard and AUS for helping and good on Tony Blair and UK too


LETS make this a better world to live in

OH and the french can suck me they r probly testing chemical weapons so the veeto was probly to save thier ass cause they r sensible but had they agreed they would have to cease testing and production and selling to the east

I COULD GO ON

MAN I CANT BELEIVE AL THE BULLSHIT GOING ON ABOUT THIS

[Prelewd]

I agree with zammo..

Weapons inspectors don't work obviously, since Iraq fired Scud missles at Kuwait, and scud missles were in breach of the UN resolution. Bomb Saddam!

[igor@af]

I am closing this topic as it is not in the right place.

Please visit the Politics, Investments & Current Affairs forum here to if you are interested in discussing the war -
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/f980/