-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Drag Racing
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-10-2008, 01:00 AM
chevy2808 chevy2808 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

im just curious as to what peoples opinions are to the NHRA proposing to drop the quarter mile from 1320 to 1000 feet in response to the Scott Kalitta fatal crash. (R.I.P. Scott we will all miss you) The NHRA believes that shortening the length will help reduce crashes because the shorter the cars are put under all the stresses, the less likely they will have catastrophic failure. Any responses will be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2008, 09:07 AM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

It will take some "getting used to". ETs will look a lot more impressive, but MPH will look like something's broke...

Most tracks around the country were built with 5 second times and sub-300 MPH in mind. Only the ones built in the last 10 or so years allow for such speeds. Many of the older ones are hemmed in by zoning or boundary issues and can't expand their shut-down areas even if they WANTED to (spend the money). I'm of the opinion each track should have distance according to their capability to handle speeds. 1/4 of a mile will ALWAYS be 1,320 feet. While I understand the problem, I think a reactionary "fix" is seldom appropriate. Each one should be dealt with as an individual situation. That would create new challenges for race teams, too! (makes things more interesting)

Well, you ASKED... (:-

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2008, 03:18 PM
chevy2808 chevy2808 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

interesting. what do you mean though by presenting new challenges
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2008, 03:40 PM
98BlackTransAm's Avatar
98BlackTransAm 98BlackTransAm is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 624
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 98BlackTransAm
Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

are they seriously considering changing it? i mean opening up the throttle completely and going 1000 ft isn't really any safer than before...and even if they shorten it to 1000 there are still going to be plenty of cars trapping deep into the 100's if not higher. i'm just so used to cars being compared in the 1/4, i'm not trying to start running a 3/16th mile
__________________
2002 Firehawk (M6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XKnrV7c_Bs
F13 cam (230/232, .595/.585, 112+4 LSA) | PRC Dual Valve Springs | LS2 Timing Chain | Ported LS6 oil pump | Pacesetter LT's | TSP catted y-pipe | Flowtech cutout | LS6 intake | SLP lid | SLP cat-back | Bilstein suspension | Tuned by Mayhem Motorsports


1998 Pontiac Trans Am (A4) - SOLD
slp lid, pacesetter lts, ory, flowtech cutout, fuddle 3400 stall, B&M tranny cooler
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2008, 03:49 PM
chevy2808 chevy2808 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

I agree that it would be a shame to shorten the quarter mile, but at the same time, the NHRA must have good reasoning behind their theory. if those 320 feet will save future lives and prevent the losses of professionals like eric medlen and scott kalitta then im all for it
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:25 PM
CassiesMan's Avatar
CassiesMan CassiesMan is offline
AF Vendor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to CassiesMan
Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

Its stupid. It is no different than with the "assault weapons" ban where they limited your magazine size. With that, I said "the second ten or fifteen rounds are no less dangerous than the second five or fiteen".

That first 1000feet is no less dangerous than the last 320feet.
__________________
2006 Redline Red Nissan 350Z Base
K&N|Falken
I am just that JDM tight, yo.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-10-2008, 09:24 PM
AWP9521 AWP9521 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 719
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

My local track went from 1/4 mile to 1/8 mile about 10 years ago, the reason being it was safer and the speeds would be lower. (Actually it was in response to him having an accident his car on the big end in Florida and got hurt pretty good) Of course the racers had mixed reactions and it was about 50/50 liking or hating the idea.

Ironicly the owner decided to take another of his cars in an "exibition" run down the track and rolled it 5 times right smack at the 1/8 mile mark. He was unhurt but couldn't say the same for the car.

Personally I too like doing the 1320 foot dash than the 1000 or 660 foot runs and think NHRA is making a mistake reducing the length of the track. They at one time mandated cutting down the amount of nitromethane allowed in the racing fuel, why not cut it down some more since it is obvious that the engine builders have found more ways of extracting more power on less of a concentration.

Plus I think it goes against the whole thought of Drag Racing in the first place, "An accelleration race between 2 vehicles, first one crossing the finish line wins", pats on the back are given to the person who broke a speed or ET record in a class, speed and time is what it's all about. Crashing and risking death is part of the game, and every participant that ever races (or raced) on a drag strip knew the risks before strapping in.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by AWP9521 - 02/16/2005
Sure sex is a thrill too, but your modified car will never tell you
"Sorry honey, I just don't feel like it tonight" it will always be in
the garage silently waiting for you to hop in so it can thrill you
some more, that is unless you break it. At least they're easier
to repair and get the thrill back than a pissed off girlfriend.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2010, 11:18 PM
sub006 sub006 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 621
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

Didn't NASCAR change their "250s" and "500s" from miles to kilometers during one of the '70s energy crises? The races were almost 40% shorter, but didn't require nearly the equipment adjustments going from 1320 to a 1000 foot dragstrip would. On the other hand, lots of people have adjusted to running 1/8mile.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2012, 07:51 PM
oldguy2 oldguy2 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 50
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: opinions on NHRA shortening the quarter mile to 1000 ft.

If it ain't broke don't fix it!!

How many drivers and teams are complaining about the current length??
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Drag Racing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts