|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
GTRA -weight reduction ideas
coming from a lotus background we spend alot of time on lightness.
1. Lexan/Plexiglass front wind screen + possilbe supports 2. Remove passanger seat/ harness 3. Remove ford radiator tank replace with small catch can. 4. Replace battery with light weight battery. 5. Remove windsheild wiper and motor, rainx. 6. replace door hinges, heavy. 7. remove front sway bar cover. 8. Aluminum heads 9. remove carpet-insulation. 10. light weight mufflers 11. aluminum shocks. 12. aluminum drive shaft. 13. aluminum block 14. ( rear end) I know of no lightweight ford 8.8 will check maybe backdraft racing knows. 15. smaller fuel cell -bad for enduros. 16. aluminum pulleys 17. light weight flywheel /aluminum bellhousing 18. Eat sushi/salads, and less steak, potatos 19. Drive with empty stomach after bowel movement. 20 . Use just enough gas to finish session. 21. Hold breath. 22. Transmission - any weight savings? 23. rear wing-change to carbon fiber. 24.aluminum suspension arms in front. 25. rear axel links in aluminum. 26. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
The rear is a Ford 9"
The trans tunnel is removable. It's heavy too. It could be replaced with aluminum.
__________________
Have Fun Jim Pomroy 96 Miata track car. 2012 Camaro SS. Backdraft Racing Cobra #930 92 Miata "LemonDrop" ![]() Saturn V Rocket Miata Crapcan #81 99 Miata daily driver. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
I believe someone makes an aluminum 9" rear housing. Not cheap.
I like the aluminum heads idea!!! And the lexan windshield. Bob replaced his with lexan as I recall from Barber. Only problem is that you dont have a "defogger" anymore because the lexan supports block the inside wiper. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
I removed the inside wiper... it was annoying, will use anti-fog. Interesting on the removal of the outside one and using rain-x.
__________________
Brian B. Panoz GTRA - LS1 swap in progress #4 Z06 - NASA ST3/TT3 |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
What goal do you have for overall weight savings? I can see 200 lbs, maybe 300 lbs. But the last 100 lbs is going to be expensive. I think you're going the right direction, but you're going to drop a lot of $$$ getting there.
Bang for the buck I'd say your best item is the all alum motor. I'm investigating dropping in a LSX motor from a Vette, Camero, or GTO. You get the best of both worlds, weight savings (100+ lbs over the existing 5.0 l), and more torque and HP (150 hp and 100+ ft-lbs). The cost will be about $2500 for an LS1 or $4000 for a LS6. Hypothetically that should get the weight to power ratio to 3000 lbs/400 hp = 7.5. (Hope I did the math right.) Not too shabby. A bumpier cam will get you up to 500 hp and a 6.0 lbs/hp ratio. That's killer, and in the range of a true GT2 car. Very fast indeed!!! Items 1 thru 7 on your list would probably only net you a 100+ lbs. The more exotic you go with light weight parts, the less reliable the car becomes. I guess it depends on what you are trying to do with the car. If your trying to get the last 1% out of the car for performance, then $$$ is secondary. If your just driving HPDE stuff, then seat time and tires will get you the best results on reduced lap times. Just my 2 cents.
__________________
Jerry 1999 Panoz GT-RA |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
^ I too have thought about a LSX swap, but I'm not racing so why bother. If I do race I'll run ST2 where the car can only have 320 rwhp based on it's weight and that can easily be done with heads/cam/intake.
__________________
Brian B. Panoz GTRA - LS1 swap in progress #4 Z06 - NASA ST3/TT3 |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
I understand what your saying. I'm sure an LSX swap will cause all kinds of issues if you want to race the car in a SCCA or other serious series. No one likes a non-standard motor swap. The series I'm thinking of running only has two classes, vintage and contemporary. They have no other classes, and restrictions are minimal.
The '99 to '02 LS1 makes 325 hp at the crank, so it might not cause all that much difficulty for the ST class. I'm sure it can be mod'ed to be 320 hp at the rear wheels. It's the weight savings that I like the most. I have only just begun to research the possibility. There are many varaibles that need to be considered before I go down this path. The mounts would need to be relocated, and I'd need to make sure the center of gravity of the motor would be similar to where the current 5.0 l sits. I like the balance of the car right now, so I'd want it to stay the same. The engine and all accessories need to fit between the frame rails, and that is always simplier said than done.
__________________
Jerry 1999 Panoz GT-RA |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
I look for cheap weight reduction ideas and same with Hp, less weight stops better, turns better, and accelerates faster. I think the cost to swap power would be high compared to hoppin up the old 302. I would like a new style 302 boss block and aluminum head. I actually think this would be the cheapest way to get the car to be a very serious car. I would like to get the car to 2600 lbs. should not be too hard. ( before fuel- driver), then get a 302 pushing right at 400 hp, so the car ready for track would be 2900lbs. and 400 hps. so a p/w ratio of 7.25. The rest of the lightening up idea are deminishing returns as cost get too high. But I did see a aluminum rear end housing unit that was not too much more than a new stock unit. A lot of what I am thinking about is speculation as I do not have a definite venue to race in. I am doing PCA/PBOC this weekend. The PBOC group head in So. Fla said he would place the car competively as it is with the 260 hp . But I will see I need a few more days in the car before I do anything major too it.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
How about switching the Fiberglass bodies to the plastic ones? I have seen the plastic panels here at a Panoz dealer and they are much lighter and relatively cheap compared to some of the other recommendations. Anyone have an idea on weight comparison?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
Quote:
__________________
Squerly |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
They let those run around a race track?
__________________
Learning to drive, one track at a time. Fast first, pretty later! (Tried it the other way = $ and no track time)
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
Guys - who knows the details of the ST classification for the GTRA in NASA? I know they have a rear wheel HP limit, but usually there are other limitations...I'd think that its not just free to do lots of stuff like you're talking about...such as: "It must be a totally stock GTRA but with a bigger motor"...the point here is does the weight reduction project put you in jeopardy of losing the NASA classification? If so, value of car becomes a novelty car and track days only...which may be fine but you wouldn't want that to be a surprise...we've seen lots of guys do this - spending pretty big bucks to make a car better, but have it lose value as it becomes non-classified....
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
^ www.nasaforums.com I posted up about it... they will work with you and you can get the car classified in ST2, but I know some are trying to run PT.
__________________
Brian B. Panoz GTRA - LS1 swap in progress #4 Z06 - NASA ST3/TT3 |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
The car classed in PTB will not be competitive for NASA, it does not have enough HP, the guys at NASA Greg G, stated openly that in TT and in Performance touring we do not really want purpose built race cars , so he gave it a spec status, no mods, min. weight like 2950 with driver, Max hp of like 265 Flywheel, no race slicks, dot r tires, yada yada. So move it to a higher class. PBOC might give it an R4, which is ok. SCCA wants a GTS car so again go to 425hp and you can run in GTS SCCA. OR NASA SU I think it is.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: GTRA -weight reduction ideas
A few questions about weight saving:
1. Are the Penski shocks aluminum and if so what is the weight savings? 2. Is there a source for the Lexan windshield? Cost? 3. Is the original bell housing aluminum? 4. Are hollow sway bars available? Cost? 5. Are the original sway bar arms aluminum? 6. Wouldn't replacing the efi with carb save weight? Any idea how much? 7. Any idea how much the weight savings is for the ABS panels? Thanks, Mike |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|