|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
02-02-2003, 05:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
FC Rx7 or Second gen. MR2
i'm thinking of selling the rx7 and going with a n/a MR2... i haven't really decided yet, so what do you guys think? it'll be mostly a daily driver, and an autocross car.
__________________
hello, i am Dan No more project cars. I wonder how long that will last... 
|
|
#3
02-04-2003, 11:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a buddy w/a 2nd gen MR2 that is setup PERFECTLY...it's a nationals car...has Koni Yellows and basically not much else...it's in E-Stock and he uses race tires to help his cause...he's amazing
So I vote for it... Unless the FC is Turbo II...then maybe if the courses were Solo I but Solo II goes to the MR2
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel 
|
|
#4
02-09-2003, 08:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
what year is the RX-7? if it is a 3rd gen 93-95, you should definatly keep it. If you were to buy an MR2, i would go with the 200 horse Turbo. The new MR2 spider is awesome! I test drove one a few weeks ago, 138 horsepower but 0-60 in 7.3!
|
|
#5
02-10-2003, 01:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The FC is the 2nd gen...not the 3rd gen (FD)
And he did say a NA 2nd gen MR2...not the turbo one... The MR-S Spyder would have been hella better if they had just put in the 180HP version in there...imagine...0-60 in around low 6's
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel
|
|
#6
02-12-2003, 08:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you NISSANSPDR.
I knew he said that he wanted a NA MR2, i just said that a Turbo would be much better. And the other night when i wrote that, i did not know that and FC was 2nd Gen, i know FD3s was 3rd though.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
