-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Nissan > Pathfinder | Terrano | QX4 | Xterra | Patrol | Safari | X-Trail
Register FAQ Community
Pathfinder | Terrano | QX4 | Xterra | Patrol | Safari | X-Trail Nissans greatest 4WDs and SUVs
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-07-2001, 02:17 AM
ChuckH's Avatar
ChuckH ChuckH is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 903
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Observations of ML320 vs. Xterra

I had an opportunity to ride in an ML320 tonight and while I know they're not really all that similar I thought I'd share what I observed.

First of all I was surprised to find that the ML had more interior rattles than my Xterra...certainly not what I would expect from a MB. Otherwise, the ride was pretty nice and there isn't much road noise or anything.

The seats of the ML are only marginally better than the Xterras, though there is more room for us larger guys (mostly in width). For the money I would expect better seats. Also, I thought the door panels were kind of plain and "cold." The flip out cupholders on the dash were kind of neat though!

I was shocked to see a "low range" button on the dash. I didn't realize MB had actually put in a low range. Shows you what I knew about the ML before!

The ML definately wins hands down on lighting. While not the best I've seen, the headlights were far superior to those of the Xterra.

I liked that the ML has a short and steeply sloped hood. That would certainly come in handy in some offroad situations.

Anyway, I thought it was nice, but fell short of what I would expect from MB. It was definately Chryslerfied in design and execution. Add to that the low ground clearance and there's no question it's not soemthing I would like. A true grocery getter that costs too much and does too little, I guess. Sorry MB, Land Rover would get my money in that class of SUV!
__________________
ChuckH
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2001, 02:36 PM
superjens's Avatar
superjens superjens is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Do some people actually take those 320's offroad? I see them all the time around here (tons of them in Vancouver) but those wide street tires just don't look like they'd do that well.

I just heard about the MB Galaendewagen (G-wagen), a d90-looking beast. Expensive but capable.

__________________
superjens.com
I like saying aboot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2001, 05:18 AM
warmonger's Avatar
warmonger warmonger is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to warmonger Send a message via Yahoo to warmonger
An ML-320 is not a true 4WD. It is All Wheel Drive. AWD means that the transfer case is a torque splitter. Basically you never get true direct drive at both front driveshafts like you do on 4WD. There is no low range and there is a differential built into the transfer case much like the LSD we have all come to know and love and it delivers a 60/40 torque split. As for capabilities off-road, it has some, but whoever is driving would do well not to get cocky and try to play follow the leader with a true 4WD. The ML-320 would not fare well.
__________________
Gordon "The Warmonger" White
2000 Silver Ice X

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2001, 01:09 PM
xoc's Avatar
xoc xoc is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 315
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by warmonger
An ML-320 is not a true 4WD.
So I guess the Toyota Land Cruiser and Jeep Grand Cherokee aren't true 4WDs either ?

The ML320 uses a real transfer case, with a 2.64:1 low range ratio and an even 50:50 split, and a crawl ratio of 48:1 (twice that of the Xterra).

I've seen an ML320 on a very difficult trail here in Colorado, and talked with the owner. The only problem he mentioned was dragging a few bits here and there, but so were we.

The ML320 has 8.4 inches of ground clearance, the same as an Xterra.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2001, 01:45 PM
Philosopher's Avatar
Philosopher Philosopher is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A little bit of info ...

http://4x4abc.com/ML320/offroad.html

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2001, 01:51 PM
Schludwiller's Avatar
Schludwiller Schludwiller is offline
XTerra Guy
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,503
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
From your link:

"Bottom line is, when the going gets rough the M-Class will get stuck where other SUVs without traction support (Jeep Grand Cherokee for example) don't even show signs of wheel spin."

Interesting link, I'll read up some more.
__________________
Xterra4x4.com and the Xterra Offroad Webring
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-09-2001, 02:20 PM
xoc's Avatar
xoc xoc is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 315
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Schludwiller
From your link:

"Bottom line is, when the going gets rough the M-Class will get stuck where other SUVs without traction support (Jeep Grand Cherokee for example) don't even show signs of wheel spin."
Articulation = traction.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-09-2001, 10:19 PM
warmonger's Avatar
warmonger warmonger is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to warmonger Send a message via Yahoo to warmonger
Interesting. I was under the impression that it used a similar setup to that of the BMW. But with a 2.64:1 Low Range, how did it achieve a crawl ratio of 48:1? What is the diff gearing? Does it have a granny gear? The X with a 4.60/1 ring and pinion and a 2:1 transfer case has a crawl ratio in the 24:1 range. Can the 2.64 possibly make that much of a difference? I would expect the transfer case gear to be more in the 3:1 range to reach that level or a much stouter gear in the diff. It is interesting that MB actually used a real transfer case though.

Quote:
Originally posted by xoc


So I guess the Toyota Land Cruiser and Jeep Grand Cherokee aren't true 4WDs either ?

The ML320 uses a real transfer case, with a 2.64:1 low range ratio and an even 50:50 split, and a crawl ratio of 48:1 (twice that of the Xterra).
__________________
Gordon "The Warmonger" White
2000 Silver Ice X

Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mp3 direct connection w/ 2002 Xterra stock radio? typal Pathfinder | Terrano | QX4 | Xterra | Patrol | Safari | X-Trail 0 11-10-2009 11:47 PM
XTerra VS 4Runner (1988) jason_2025 Pathfinder | Terrano | QX4 | Xterra | Patrol | Safari | X-Trail 17 07-12-2009 11:39 PM
ML320 vs. RX300 vs. MDX MunG35 Car Buying Q&A 0 04-15-2004 03:31 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Nissan > Pathfinder | Terrano | QX4 | Xterra | Patrol | Safari | X-Trail


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts