 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
02-28-2001, 10:49 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 211
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
which one? I would go with the Del Sol.even though it's heavier than the CRX there alway's an egine swap B18C5. An instant gain of 30HP
CRX 1991 hp:108 weight:2178 Del Sol 1995 hp:160 weight:2520
__________________
Still wishin for a Sol.... but bought a Eclipse instead 92 Eclipse GS 1.8L |
|
|
|
|
03-04-2001, 01:07 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Old Mod
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I'd take the Del Sol. Better looks, plenty of potential, and you get a targa top. I don't think the CRX is very good looking.
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari" |
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2001, 06:59 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeah, i think the CRX is pretty ugly
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-11-2001, 07:56 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Missing in action
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 2,954
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I'd go CRX. Yeah, it's small and light, and you sacrifice some aspects of your car-driving experience for the sake of performance (or better gas mileage - whatever your fancy), but I've seen some quite handsome CRX's in my day.
If you are a serious Honda racer, much of the work in removing extra weight from your car is already done in the CRX. Without having to substitute chassis parts with more lightweight materials, you already have a very light unibody to work with. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2001, 09:37 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Old Mod
 Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 333
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yeah i would also go with the sol. More power, and comparing stock for stock...the sol with vtec would beat the crx. IMO it also looks better.
__________________
2004 Acura TSX with NAVI and Nav-TV tuner |
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2001, 09:38 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Old Mod
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 333
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Like JD said it would also be very easy to make a crx faster than a sol with the money you save.
__________________
2004 Acura TSX with NAVI and Nav-TV tuner |
|
|
|
|
|
03-25-2001, 11:24 AM
|
#7 | |
|
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yep, id go wit the DEL SOL too
looks so much better, instant convertible has the design of a super car 2-seater flat rear window!! plus u can always do engine swaps and turbos and stuff to the del sol jus as u can do to the crx |
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 08:43 AM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denver (Hometown), Colorado
Posts: 315
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'd say depends on what you're wanting it for. A crx has a lot of potential as a drag queen, but is that really what you want? The del sol would probably be a better car for the streets because of it's cruise value (the targa top get's the chix... we have a topless sol club in colo) and because the handling would be better. But I've seen a 600hp na crx w/ 16:1 compression. total badass car. So I guess it's all up to your tastes, and what you're doin w/ the car
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
