|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
1990 Transmission needs replaced, what brand do you recommend?
I'm in the planning process of swapping the stock 305 that came with it for a 350 with around 250-275hp (see other thread.)
When I changed the fluid I noticed some clutch dust and some metal shavings and half of a dime sized washer chunk. So seeing as it's going to need some work soon, I figured I'd invest in a new transmision that will cope well with a 350. The current tranny is a stock 200-4r. 119,492 miles. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1990 Transmission needs replaced, what brand do you recommend?
What brand, or what type?
If you're going to run a 350, build up a decent TH700R4 or 4L60 (a 700R4 with the auxiliary valve body - saves internal parts by cushioning engagement in forward or reverse). You will need a driveshaft for sure. If you get a transmission that also has a mount provision on the tailshaft cone, you can still use the TH2004R crossmember. If not, you will need a crossmember for a TH700R4.
__________________
1988 9C1 - Modified LM1 @ 275HP/350TQ - TH700R4 - 3.08 8.5" Disc Rear - see it at http://www.silicon212.org/9c1! 2005 Crown Vic P71 - former AZ DPS - 4.6 liters of pure creamy slothness! 1967 El Camino L79/M20 old school asphalt raper Remember - a government that is strong enough to give you everything you need, is also strong enough to take everything you have. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1990 Transmission needs replaced, what brand do you recommend?
Thanks for the reply, sorry I should of stated I'm asking on both brand and type.
I hope you won't mind if I pick your brain a little. Why the 700R4 over the 200-4r? What my research has turned up so far is a 2004r has slightly better MPG in over drive, and the 700r4 has a lower first gear. The 4L60 has better reliabilty over the 700R4 from what you mentioned correct? I'm currently looking at Bowtie Overdrives level 2, but am far from convinced they're a good buy. I really don't see this car going over 350 hp any time soon. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1990 Transmission needs replaced, what brand do you recommend?
Quote:
The 4L60 is a later-model of the 700R4 - it has several valve-body and strengthening improvements over the earlier design. I denote transmissions made before about July 1986 as being 700R4s, those made after as 4L60s. The main difference, again, is the front pump and aux valve body - which is a spool valve and an accumulator that softens engagement out of neutral or park. This saves parts, but it also makes the engagement smoother from the driver point of view - without it, 700R4s have this habit of engaging in reverse so hard, that the back wheels can actually spin a little (chirp, bark) when the transmission engages. The aux valve body eliminates this.
__________________
1988 9C1 - Modified LM1 @ 275HP/350TQ - TH700R4 - 3.08 8.5" Disc Rear - see it at http://www.silicon212.org/9c1! 2005 Crown Vic P71 - former AZ DPS - 4.6 liters of pure creamy slothness! 1967 El Camino L79/M20 old school asphalt raper Remember - a government that is strong enough to give you everything you need, is also strong enough to take everything you have. |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|