Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Racing > Non Specific
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Non Specific This is the forum to post and generalized racing questions.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2007, 07:40 PM   #1
KillaKaze024
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question about Weight to power ratio

I am making a word document with various cars from many different makers from 06/07 depending on the most recent versions. In it I list the basic engine type such as I4, V8 etc, Horsepower, and of course, the weight to power ratio (WPR).


My question is say that I have a car with 190 horsepower and a 10.21 WPR and a car with 350 Horsepower and a WPR of 12.1.

Going by WPR alone one would guess that the first car would win in a race, but since the horsepower is so greatly in favor of the 2nd car, wouldnt the 2nd car still pull ahead?

I guess I am asking how can I take into consideration the Horsepower when looking at WPRs.

Also, how can I play torque into this? It would be neat to make a formula to accuratly estimate who theoretically would win.
KillaKaze024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:13 PM   #2
-The Stig-
On Fire!
 
-The Stig-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to -The Stig-
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

Moved to correct forum...

Now you may discuss...
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler
1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car


User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.

-The Stig- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:14 PM   #3
bad360rt
AF Regular
 
bad360rt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

There are many factors deciding which car will win, gearing, FWD vs. RWD, etc., etc. But generally speaking with cars that are setup fairly similarly, the better weight/hp ratio will win. Take the C6 Z06 and '06 Viper for instance. Both have 500hp, but the Z06 weighs over 300lbs less than the Viper, which is why the Z runs mid-low 11's and the Viper runs mid-high 11's. The Viper even has more torque, but can't make up for the weight disadvantage. Now the new '08 Viper has 600hp and looks to be running about the same times as the Z06 (C&D got 11.5@126 out of the Viper and 11.6@125 out of the Z06).
__________________


-Dave
'02 Dakota 5.9 R/T
Intercooled Paxton - 11.3@120
425/W5/nitrous setup coming soon
bad360rt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:33 PM   #4
KillaKaze024
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

So if two cars are the same in all aspects other than weight and power, with a weight to power that is equal, they would in theory tie in a drag style race.
I would guess that the lighter car with less HP would eventually lose ground on the more powerful but heavier car once the heavier car got up a few gears.
KillaKaze024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 09:46 PM   #5
KillaKaze024
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

Do these look accurate?
I got the weights and horsepowers from howitsworks consumer guide.


2006 Acura RSX I4 201 Horsepower, 13.60 WPR
2007 Acura TL V6 286 Horsepower, 12.66 WPR

2007 Cadillac STS V6 254 Horsepower, 15.18 WPR
2007 Cadillac STS V8 320 Horsepower, 11.83 WPR
2007 Cadillac STS V8SC 469 Horsepower, 8.22 WPR

2007 Dodge Charger DOHC V6 190 Horsepower, 20.10 WPR
2007 Dodge Charger SOHC V6 250 Horsepower, 15.28 WPR
2007 Dodge Charger V8 425 Horsepower, 8.98 WPR
2006 Dodge Viper V10 510 Horsepower, 6.72 WPR

2007 Ferrari 612 Scaglietti V12 532 Horsepower, 7.62 WPR
KillaKaze024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 10:52 PM   #6
CassiesMan
AF Vendor
 
CassiesMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colleyville, Texas
Posts: 5,322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to CassiesMan
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

Power to weight ratio is only one aspect of racing. You need to take into account aerodynamics, power curve, torque curve, gearing, drive train, and power to weight in order to be able to even start to guess who might win.
__________________
2006 Redline Red Nissan 350Z Base
K&N|Falken
I am just that JDM tight, yo.
CassiesMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 10:56 PM   #7
GForce957
AF Enthusiast
 
GForce957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Invalid
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

Quote:
Originally Posted by KillaKaze024
So if two cars are the same in all aspects other than weight and power, with a weight to power that is equal, they would in theory tie in a drag style race.
You just said they are exactly equal, just used more words. In theory yes they would tie.



Quote:
Originally Posted by KillaKaze024
Do these look accurate?
I got the weights and horsepowers from howitsworks consumer guide.
Accurate how? Does your WPR all add up? I don't feel like using a calculator right now If you mean do the numbers compare to them beating a higher numbered car then yes it looks accurate except for the tl vs sts. If its 286hp then you are referring to the A-Spec TL, which I've seen slips for low 14's. The sts clocked in at 14.6 at 97 with car and driver, so its not an exact science.
GForce957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 10:58 PM   #8
KillaKaze024
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

Quote:
Originally Posted by GForce957
You just said they are exactly equal, just used more words. In theory yes they would tie.





Accurate how? Does your WPR all add up? I don't feel like using a calculator right now If you mean do the numbers compare to them beating a higher numbered car then yes it looks accurate except for the tl vs sts. If its 286hp then you are referring to the A-Spec TL, which I've seen slips for low 14's. The sts clocked in at 14.6 at 97 with car and driver, so its not an exact science.
Yea thats what I meant. The math is quite simple
I sorted them lowest to highest as well.
KillaKaze024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 10:59 PM   #9
KillaKaze024
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

2007 Chevy Corvette V8 505 Horsepower, 6.31 WPR
2006 Ford GT V8SC 550 Horsepower, 6.33 WPR
2006 Dodge Viper V10 510 Horsepower, 6.72 WPR
2007 Ford Mustang V8SC 500 Horsepower, 6.85 WPR
2007 Ferrari 612 Scaglietti V12 532 Horsepower, 7.62 WPR
2007 Cadillac STS V8SC 469 Horsepower, 8.22 WPR
2007 Cadillac XLR V8SC 443 Horsepower, 8.23 WPR
2007 Jaguar XK Series V8 420 Horsepower, 8.48 WPR
2007 Dodge Charger V8 425 Horsepower, 8.98 WPR
2007 Cadillac CTS V8 400 Horsepower, 9.23 WPR
2006 Pontiac GTO V8 400 Horsepower, 9.31 WPR
2007 Jaguar S Type V8SC 400 Horsepower, 9.40 WPR
2007 Jaguar XJ Series V8SC 400 Horsepower, 9.44 WPR
2007 Lexus LS V8ELEC 438 Horsepower, 9.88 WPR
2007 Subaru Impreza H4TC 293 Horsepower, 10.38 WPR
2007 Ford Mustang V8 319 Horsepower, 10.73 WPR
2008 Infiniti G V6 330 Horsepower, 10.77 WPR
2007 Mazda 3 I4TC 263 Horsepower, 10.85 WPR
2007 Lexus G5 V6ELEC 339 Horsepower, 10.92 WPR
2007 Solstice I4TC 260 Horsepower, 11.00 WPR
2007 Chevy Monte Carlo V8 303 Horsepower, 11.06 WPR
2007 Lexus IS V6 306 Horsepower, 11.29 WPR
2007 Nissan Altima V6 270 Horsepower, 11.31 WPR
2007 Cadillac XLR V8 320 Horsepower, 11.39 WPR
2007 Lexus LS V8 380 Horsepower, 11.39 WPR
2007 Infiniti G35 V6 306 Horsepower, 11.44 WPR
2007 Pontiac Grand Prix V8 303 Horsepower, 11.47 WPR
2006 Nissan 350z V6 300 Horsepower, 11.53 WPR
2007 Mazda 6 I4TC 270 Horsepower, 11.64 WPR
2006 Chevy SSR V8 400 Horsepower, 11.75 WPR
2007 Infiniti M V8 325 Horsepower, 11.79 WPR
2007 Cadillac STS V8 320 Horsepower, 11.83 WPR
2007 Honda S2000 I4 237 Horsepower, 12.04 WPR
2007 Honda Accord V6ELEC 253 Horsepower, 12.22 WPR
2007 Lexus G5 V6 303 Horsepower, 12.22 WPR
2007 Jaguar S Type V8 300 Horsepower, 12.53 WPR
2007 Jaguar XJ Series V8 300 Horsepower, 12.59 WPR
2007 Acura TL V6 286 Horsepower, 12.66 WPR
2007 Honda Accord V6 244 Horsepower, 12.67 WPR
2007 Lexus G5 V8 290 Horsepower, 12.77 WPR
2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse V6 263 Horsepower, 12.77 WPR
2007 Lexus ES350 V6 272 Horsepower, 13.16 WPR
2007 Honda Civic I4 197 Horsepower, 13.25 WPR
2007 Lexus SC430 V8 288 Horsepower, 13.33 WPR
2007 Pontiac Grand Prix V6SC 260 Horsepower, 13.37 WPR
2007 Chevy Cobalt I4SC 205 Horsepower, 13.42 WPR
2007 Infiniti FX V8 320 Horsepower, 13.57 WPR
2006 Acura RSX I4 201 Horsepower, 13.60 WPR
2007 Infiniti M V6 275 Horsepower, 13.93 WPR
2008 Ford Taurus V6 260 Horsepower, 14.01 WPR
2008 Mercury Sable V6 260 Horsepower, 14.01 WPR
2007 Ford Fusion V6 221 Horsepower, 14.03 WPR
2007 Nissan Maxima V6 255 Horsepower, 14.03 WPR
2007 Pontiac G6 DOHCV6 252 Horsepower, 14.13 WPR
2007 Nissan Sentra I4 200 Horsepower, 14.26 WPR
2008 Dodge Avenger SOHC V6 235 Horsepower, 14.27 WPR
2007 Cadillac CTS V6 255 Horsepower, 14.48 WPR
2007 Mazda 6 V6 212 Horsepower, 14.83 WPR
2007 Pontiac G6 OHCV6 240 Horsepower, 14.69 WPR
2007 Cadillac STS V6 254 Horsepower, 15.18 WPR
2007 Dodge Charger SOHC V6 250 Horsepower, 15.28 WPR
2007 Nissan Altima I4ELEC 198 Horsepower, 15.42 WPR
2007 Infiniti FX V6 280 Horsepower, 15.51 WPR
2007 Acura TSX I4 205 Horsepower, 15.88 WPR
2007 Chevy Monte Carlo V6 211 Horsepower, 15.89 WPR
2007 Chevy Cobalt I4 173 Horsepower, 15.92 WPR
2007 Jaguar X Type V6 227 Horsepower, 15.99 WPR
2007 Jaguar S Type V6 235 Horsepower, 16.00 WPR
2007 Solstice I4 177 Horsepower, 16.15 WPR
2007 Ford Mustang V6 210 Horsepower, 16.30 WPR
1999 Ford Taurus DOHCV6 200 Horsepower, 16.63 WPR
2007 Pontiac Grand Prix V6 200 Horsepower, 17.38 WPR
2007 Nissan Altima I4 174 Horsepower, 17.45 WPR
2007 Subaru Impreza H4 173 Horsepower, 17.59 WPR
2008 Dodge Avenger DOHC V6 190 Horsepower, 17.65 WPR
2007 Ford 500 V6 203 Horsepower, 17.97 WPR
2007 Mazda 3 I4 156 Horsepower, 18.30 WPR
2007 Honda Accord I4 166 Horsepower, 18.62 WPR
2007 Ford Fusion I4 160 Horsepower, 19.38 WPR
2008 Dodge Avenger I4 172 Horsepower, 19.50 WPR
2007 Dodge Charger DOHC V6 190 Horsepower, 20.10 WPR
2007 Mazda 6 I4 156 Horsepower, 20.16 WPR
2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse I4 162 Horsepower, 20.74 WPR
2007 Pontiac G6 I4 167 Horsepower, 21.11 WPR

Just took a bunch of random cars to see where my car stood.
Not so good, as you can see the 99 car near the end of the list
KillaKaze024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 11:05 PM   #10
GForce957
AF Enthusiast
 
GForce957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Invalid
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

You also have to take into account that some manufacturers over or underestimate their cars.

ex. Cobras. The 99 cobra was often not dynoing at 320hp, it was making less.
The 03 cobra was making more then the advertised 390.
GForce957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 11:18 PM   #11
KillaKaze024
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

Quote:
Originally Posted by GForce957
You also have to take into account that some manufacturers over or underestimate their cars.

ex. Cobras. The 99 cobra was often not dynoing at 320hp, it was making less.
The 03 cobra was making more then the advertised 390.
Yea thats true.

Would you say that this chart would atleast give a general clue to some one 2 days into their life in the world of automobiles? Such as myself?
KillaKaze024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2007, 08:11 AM   #12
SilentNIght1647
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson, Nebraska
Posts: 162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

I suppose the list is accurate but you have to take it with a grain of salt not all of those numbers are correct and just because car X has a better W/P ratio does not mean the car will be faster. When you race a car you have to look at the total package no one thing is more important than any other.
SilentNIght1647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2007, 08:52 AM   #13
CassiesMan
AF Vendor
 
CassiesMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colleyville, Texas
Posts: 5,322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to CassiesMan
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

There is no exact science to predicting a race. For one, nothing is ever equal. You can throw an awesome driver in a low 14 second car and a pissant driver in a higher 13 second car...more than likely the 14 is gonna win. Power to weight is only one factor of many. You can't depend on power to weight alone to figure out a car's performance.
__________________
2006 Redline Red Nissan 350Z Base
K&N|Falken
I am just that JDM tight, yo.
CassiesMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2007, 06:36 PM   #14
-The Stig-
On Fire!
 
-The Stig-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to -The Stig-
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

Exactly, there are too many factors to think about.

Crunching numbers and bench racing only go so far, at some point you gotta get your ass out on the asphault and get at it.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler
1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car


User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.

-The Stig- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2007, 11:24 PM   #15
psych0hans
AF Regular
 
psych0hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Question about Weight to power ratio

You also have to take into account the aerodynamics of the car... You could put a 1000+hp in almost any car, but if its not aerodynamic it wont do much good. Thats the difference between a 600+hp Skyline and a mclaren f1, the Mclaren will win mainly on accord of its shape etc...
__________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." George W. Bush—Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
psych0hans is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Racing > Non Specific


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts