|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Kung-Fu movies rock. | |||
| Ferrari 288 GTO Evoluzione |
|
0 | 0% |
| Porsche 959 |
|
1 | 100.00% |
| Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Porsche 959 vs. Ferrari 288 GTO Evoluzione
Well, what's your fancy? Both cars were way ahead of their times. Both are still considered mechanic marvels. Both are still considered extremelly fast and were released close to two decades ago. I personally would take the 288. Although I like the looks of the regular 288 much better. Here's some specs:
Ferrari 288 GTO Evoluzione: Years of production 1985 - 1986 Numbers built 6 Body design N/A Weight 940 kg / 2072.3 lbs Drivetrain: Engine 90º V8 Engine location Mid, longitudinally mounted Displacement 2.855 liter / 174.2 cu in Valvetrain 4 valves/cylinder, DOHC Fuel feed Weber-Marelli Fuel injection Aspiration Twin IHI Turbos Gearbox N/A Drive Rear wheel drive Performance figures: Power 650 bhp / 484.9 kW BHP/Liter 227.7 Torque 667 Nm / 492.0 ft lbs Power to weight ratio 0.69 bhp/kg Top Speed 229.9 mph / 370.0 km/h 0-60 mph Acceleration 4.00 s Porsche 959: Engine: Horizontally opposed 6 cylinder, 24-valve DOHC aluminum block and water-cooled heads Bore and stroke: 3.74" x 2.64" Displacement:174 cu.in. or 2849cc Max boost pressure: 14.0 psi Horsepower: 450@6,500 rpm Power to weight ratio: 6.6 lbs per horsepower Compression ratio: 8.3:1 Cd: .31 Fuel system: Bosch Motronic Induction: Twin sequential turbocharging Drivetrain: 6 speed electronically controlled 4wd with 4 settings Suspension: Electronically adjustable independent f/r with upper and lower A arms, hydraulic shocks, anti-roll bar/coil. Body: Kevlar and aluminum Dimensions: Curb weight: 2,917 lbs Wheelbase: 89.4" Length: 167.7" Width: 72.4" Height: 47.2" Brakes and Wheels: ABS, power assisted, vented, cross drilled disks 17x8.0" front,17x9.0" rear cast magnesium wheels with pressure sensors to detect hairline cracks Fuel Economy: 13 mpg Performance: 0-60mph: 3.6 seconds (US version: 3.5s) 0-100: 8.3 0-125: 12.7 0-140: 19.0 0-1/4 mile: 11.8s @119 mph Top Speed: 198++ mph
__________________
My dream, feel free to donate some money to help
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
No one has an opinion?
__________________
My dream, feel free to donate some money to help
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
CFA
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
If its not a Japanese tin-box no one seems to care these days... this is Porsche and Ferrari's finest, people!
To answer your question, i'd have to take the 959.. ive always had a crush on it, and the 288 gto evo is just too ugly.. if it was the standard 288 gto it would be a lot closer... and if it was an F40, i'd be here all night trying to make up my mind |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|