|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: pretty close | |||
| mitsubishi8 lancer evo 3 |
   
|
2 | 50.00% |
| subaru impreza wrx (94 version) |
  
|
2 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
10-23-2002, 05:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
subaru wrx (my94) vs mitsubishi lancer evo 3
evo has the power subie has the maddest sound and im gona let u guys type wat u think now.:grey:
|
|
#2
10-23-2002, 10:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Weell, Im a dyed-in-the-wool Subbie fan, so its the only choice for me
 I also really like the styling of these old Subaru's. And they still make plenty of power.
|
|
#3
10-23-2002, 04:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
the evo 3's body style was just ugly. and it only had 250hp. even though i don't know what the 94 WRX's look like, i'm pretty sure it looked pretty close to the last gen's body style.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX  Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
|
|
#4
10-24-2002, 04:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
b4 the bug eyed subaru body change the subaru had looked exactly the same(except sum slmaal changes in the front) the my 94 to my knoldge had around 140kw to 160kw in standard form the sti's had jap limit of 206kw.
|
|
#6
10-25-2002, 10:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here she goes:
multiply teh KW by 1.341 to get hp divide hp by .7455 to get KW It is because 1 hp is equal to 550 feet per pound per second. this is what the average horse could do: lift 550lbs up one foot in one second. Conversely, it also means it could lift 1 pound 550 feet in 1 second. 1 Kw is 738 feet per pound per second. Why? Im not sure, it isn't really car related 
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
