|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain Discuss Engine, Transmission, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
What turbo is better?
Ok i just bought all of the supporting mods to get a new turbo and i was looking at these 2 turbos, what one is better?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/DSM-4...47982263QQrdZ1 http://www.slowboyracing.com/more.php?id=9& |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Ok, well I'm going to say you get more with the ebay kit. That doesn't mean it's the better deal. I'm going to say that it is actually the worst of the two. I wouldn't buy a "turbo" off of ebay. Especially from XS Power (not that this is from them, but looks like they might have made it). The non-name brand turbos from ebay are sorry and won't last. Some of them have been glued together. I would say that you can pick up a decent FMIC kit off of ebay though, as the intercoolers are good/and cheap(as far as pricewise) and a pipe is a pipe.
I would definitely say the SBR-G50 is the better buy. It is name brand and has a good reputation. So, SBR FTW...
__________________
Quote:
1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch ![]() 1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces 3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD 2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
you get what you pay for...and most deals on ebay are too good to be true...besides...when you're modding your car do it right the first time...pay the extra cost b/c if you go cheap you'll be paying a lot more down the road..that's unless you come across a real good deal by a brand you know
__________________
The name's Adrian 1990 Civic HB Si - 265.7whp/223tq @9.2psi. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 1991 Civic Sedan DX - 296.3whp/230tq @1bar. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 1991 Civic Sedan DX - 185.8whp/139tq. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 2006 G35 Coupe 6MT - Stock 2011 CR-Z - Stock |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Ebay turboes are generally regarded as junk and won't break the 10k mile mark.
__________________
'92 3000gt SL Zoom Stage 1 Clutch Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
lol
they will split in to... SERIOUSLY! split and shatter into 100000000000 pieces... and when that happends... odds are... buh by valve, and probably a few pistons...
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Ok thats good to know.. lol what about this turbo?
http://dsmparts.com/customer/product...=463&cat=&page= I hear that they are pretty good.. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Quote:
Here's the Mitsubishi version (costs more, but it'd be worth it in my opinion). http://www.slowboyracing.com/more.ph...1-2027,42-2033 These turbos(50-trim and E16G) are two different sizes. How much hp are you looking to put down? Also, the E16G will bolt up to your stock manifold. The 50-trim will not, but if you spring for the t3 manifold, it will allow you more options to upgrade to in the future. With either of those turbo's, if you're gonna use some high boost and lay some good numbers, I'd spring for the external gate (50-trim, you have to)
__________________
Quote:
1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch ![]() 1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces 3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD 2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
you have to tell us what your goals are h.p wise, also what you bought for supporting mods, hopefully they include fuel management (injectors and fuel pump and fuel pressure regulator, and a tuning device SAFC2+data logger, dsm link etc...) but my choice would be the sbr g-50 because thats what im getting it only outflows the evo 3 16g by 4 or 5 lbs/min if im not mistaken (correct me if im wrong) if your lookin to make 300-350 whp get the evo and you could run 550cc injectors and safc2 with fpr and f/p.. but for 350+ get the g50 its a really good bang for your buck but if you get the g50 your going to have to run 780cc inj and dsm link (ive seen like 2 people run safc on these big of injectors(780) with these turbos but i dont think its worth it when dsm link is like 2 bills more then sacf2(neo)
__________________
1997 gst (5speed) Apexi 3" turboback k&n intake w/hardpipe greddy type s bov w/ piping Apexi SAFC2 new revised 3g lifters magnacore 10.3mm wires w/ new plugs |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Ok i am looking to get about 300-350 hp. i already have a fpr and 550 cc injectors. I also got a datalogger on the way. Oh and i have a walboro 255 fuel pump.
I am wanting a turbo that would be the best for street racing and still have room for mods. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Then the 16g is your turbo!
__________________
FP 18g turbo e3 o2 & mani, 3" exhaust, , 7 bolt, wiseco/eagle, walbro 255hp re-wired, Aeromotive FPR, FIC 1150cc, injen intake, greddy RS, aem wideband, turbo xs mbc, act 2600 clutch sprung 6 puck, BC 272's, dsmlink v2.5, ETS FMIC, Devils Own, JMF SMIM. 18 Inch chrome rims In closet AEM Fuel Rail, SS Lines, 1997 TSI AWD Diamonds Are 4Ever 12.7 @ 107 http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j2...y/DSC00461.jpg |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch ![]() 1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces 3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD 2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
the evo 3 is probally the gt series...actually i can probally gaurnentee it is. you could probally find a better quality turbo at target. and the gt50 is a SBR, last time i checked SBR was still using the Bulleye turbine housing, that housing is cause to huge hp loss, around ~75hp loss.... so my answer is neither.
__________________
![]() 1998 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 6 Bolt Swap \ DSMLink V2.5 \ ACT 2100 clutch \ PTE SCM 61 \ Forge MBC@28psi \ VPE O2 Housing \ MR Downpipe \ Thermal R&D Cat-Back \ Tial 38mm WG dumping off O2 \ FMIC w\ in short route \ AFPR setup/walbro 255hp \ PTE 880cc injectors \ Crower Ti retianers \ Crower Springs \ Crower 64414 (stage 3 race) cams \ Ferrea valves \ 3.5 bar MAP \ PLX M-300 Wideband |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Quote:
OT: How much hp you getting outta your setup?, can you get off the line decent?(wheel spin/hop?)
__________________
Quote:
1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch ![]() 1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces 3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD 2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
I always wondered why SBR turbos seemed to be lower. How do you like that PTE? I am eyeing up a couple PTEs and I think that would probably be the better option for the thread starter.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What turbo is better?
Quote:
Bolt-on a T3/T4 manifold, that'll leave you more options when you upgrade/swap turbos. I just think that's the better route. I'll be honest, I was originally looking at the PTE(50), but I decided to not go that route, for aforementioned reason. I've heard decent things a/b their construction and reliability... as far as performance, I've never been close enough to one to see any hard data...
__________________
Quote:
1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch ![]() 1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces 3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD 2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|