-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Mitsubishi > Eclipse/Talon/Laser > Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain
Register FAQ Community
Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain Discuss Engine, Transmission, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-14-2006, 07:54 AM
ABigWeaney ABigWeaney is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What turbo is better?

Ok i just bought all of the supporting mods to get a new turbo and i was looking at these 2 turbos, what one is better?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/DSM-4...47982263QQrdZ1

http://www.slowboyracing.com/more.php?id=9&
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2006, 08:11 AM
Mikelb's Avatar
Mikelb Mikelb is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mikelb
Re: What turbo is better?

Ok, well I'm going to say you get more with the ebay kit. That doesn't mean it's the better deal. I'm going to say that it is actually the worst of the two. I wouldn't buy a "turbo" off of ebay. Especially from XS Power (not that this is from them, but looks like they might have made it). The non-name brand turbos from ebay are sorry and won't last. Some of them have been glued together. I would say that you can pick up a decent FMIC kit off of ebay though, as the intercoolers are good/and cheap(as far as pricewise) and a pipe is a pipe.

I would definitely say the SBR-G50 is the better buy. It is name brand and has a good reputation.

So, SBR FTW...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackcrow64
I write a lot... I wrote one song about this chick I was messing with that was uhhh... Well, lets just say I called it "Forbidden Love"


1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken
Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch

1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces
3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end

Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD

2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2006, 08:20 AM
BLU CIVIC's Avatar
BLU CIVIC BLU CIVIC is offline
調整器
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,254
Thanks: 11
Thanked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BLU CIVIC Send a message via Yahoo to BLU CIVIC
Re: What turbo is better?

you get what you pay for...and most deals on ebay are too good to be true...besides...when you're modding your car do it right the first time...pay the extra cost b/c if you go cheap you'll be paying a lot more down the road..that's unless you come across a real good deal by a brand you know
__________________
The name's Adrian
1990 Civic HB Si - 265.7whp/223tq @9.2psi. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills
1991 Civic Sedan DX - 296.3whp/230tq @1bar. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills
1991 Civic Sedan DX - 185.8whp/139tq. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills
2006 G35 Coupe 6MT - Stock
2011 CR-Z - Stock
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2006, 09:34 AM
l_eclipse_l's Avatar
l_eclipse_l l_eclipse_l is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What turbo is better?

Ebay turboes are generally regarded as junk and won't break the 10k mile mark.
__________________
'92 3000gt SL

Zoom Stage 1 Clutch

Quote:
Originally Posted by kjewer1
I disagree. Better is better. Bigger is just bigger.

I just made that up, and I like it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:57 PM
Black99GST's Avatar
Black99GST Black99GST is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,966
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Black99GST
Re: What turbo is better?

lol they will split in to... SERIOUSLY! split and shatter into 100000000000 pieces... and when that happends... odds are... buh by valve, and probably a few pistons...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-15-2006, 07:50 AM
ABigWeaney ABigWeaney is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What turbo is better?

Ok thats good to know.. lol what about this turbo?

http://dsmparts.com/customer/product...=463&cat=&page=

I hear that they are pretty good..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-15-2006, 08:25 AM
Mikelb's Avatar
Mikelb Mikelb is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mikelb
Re: What turbo is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABigWeaney
Ok thats good to know.. lol what about this turbo?

http://dsmparts.com/customer/product...=463&cat=&page=

I hear that they are pretty good..
I don't know too much a/b that turbo, but I do know it's not an actual Mitsubishi turbo. It may be a 16G STYLE, but not THE 16G...

Here's the Mitsubishi version (costs more, but it'd be worth it in my opinion).
http://www.slowboyracing.com/more.ph...1-2027,42-2033


These turbos(50-trim and E16G) are two different sizes. How much hp are you looking to put down?

Also, the E16G will bolt up to your stock manifold. The 50-trim will not, but if you spring for the t3 manifold, it will allow you more options to upgrade to in the future.

With either of those turbo's, if you're gonna use some high boost and lay some good numbers, I'd spring for the external gate (50-trim, you have to)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackcrow64
I write a lot... I wrote one song about this chick I was messing with that was uhhh... Well, lets just say I called it "Forbidden Love"


1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken
Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch

1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces
3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end

Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD

2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2006, 08:32 AM
baker1234 baker1234 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 90
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What turbo is better?

you have to tell us what your goals are h.p wise, also what you bought for supporting mods, hopefully they include fuel management (injectors and fuel pump and fuel pressure regulator, and a tuning device SAFC2+data logger, dsm link etc...) but my choice would be the sbr g-50 because thats what im getting it only outflows the evo 3 16g by 4 or 5 lbs/min if im not mistaken (correct me if im wrong) if your lookin to make 300-350 whp get the evo and you could run 550cc injectors and safc2 with fpr and f/p.. but for 350+ get the g50 its a really good bang for your buck but if you get the g50 your going to have to run 780cc inj and dsm link (ive seen like 2 people run safc on these big of injectors(780) with these turbos but i dont think its worth it when dsm link is like 2 bills more then sacf2(neo)
__________________
1997 gst (5speed)
Apexi 3" turboback
k&n intake w/hardpipe
greddy type s bov w/ piping
Apexi SAFC2
new revised 3g lifters
magnacore 10.3mm wires w/ new plugs
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2006, 12:32 PM
ABigWeaney ABigWeaney is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What turbo is better?

Ok i am looking to get about 300-350 hp. i already have a fpr and 550 cc injectors. I also got a datalogger on the way. Oh and i have a walboro 255 fuel pump.

I am wanting a turbo that would be the best for street racing and still have room for mods.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-15-2006, 12:44 PM
steviek's Avatar
steviek steviek is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,868
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Re: What turbo is better?

Then the 16g is your turbo!
__________________
FP 18g turbo e3 o2 & mani, 3" exhaust, , 7 bolt, wiseco/eagle, walbro 255hp re-wired, Aeromotive FPR, FIC 1150cc, injen intake, greddy RS, aem wideband, turbo xs mbc, act 2600 clutch sprung 6 puck, BC 272's, dsmlink v2.5, ETS FMIC, Devils Own, JMF SMIM.
18 Inch chrome rims
In closet AEM Fuel Rail, SS Lines,
1997 TSI AWD
Diamonds Are 4Ever
12.7 @ 107
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j2...y/DSC00461.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-15-2006, 12:55 PM
Mikelb's Avatar
Mikelb Mikelb is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mikelb
Re: What turbo is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steviek
Then the 16g is your turbo!
Evo III 16G... I might suggest either getting the 34mm wastegate upgrade or getting an external wastegate (best), to control that nasty boost creep
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackcrow64
I write a lot... I wrote one song about this chick I was messing with that was uhhh... Well, lets just say I called it "Forbidden Love"


1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken
Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch

1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces
3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end

Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD

2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-15-2006, 01:25 PM
97_3clipse's Avatar
97_3clipse 97_3clipse is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 913
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 97_3clipse
Re: What turbo is better?

the evo 3 is probally the gt series...actually i can probally gaurnentee it is. you could probally find a better quality turbo at target. and the gt50 is a SBR, last time i checked SBR was still using the Bulleye turbine housing, that housing is cause to huge hp loss, around ~75hp loss.... so my answer is neither.
__________________

1998 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
6 Bolt Swap \ DSMLink V2.5 \ ACT 2100 clutch \ PTE SCM 61 \ Forge MBC@28psi \ VPE O2 Housing \ MR Downpipe \ Thermal R&D Cat-Back \ Tial 38mm WG dumping off O2 \ FMIC w\ in short route \ AFPR setup/walbro 255hp \ PTE 880cc injectors \ Crower Ti retianers \ Crower Springs \ Crower 64414 (stage 3 race) cams \ Ferrea valves \ 3.5 bar MAP \ PLX M-300 Wideband
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-15-2006, 01:41 PM
Mikelb's Avatar
Mikelb Mikelb is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mikelb
Re: What turbo is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 97_3clipse
the evo 3 is probally the gt series...actually i can probally gaurnentee it is. you could probally find a better quality turbo at target. and the gt50 is a SBR, last time i checked SBR was still using the Bulleye turbine housing, that housing is cause to huge hp loss, around ~75hp loss.... so my answer is neither.
I already said (in an earlier post) to get the Mitsu E16G...


OT: How much hp you getting outta your setup?, can you get off the line decent?(wheel spin/hop?)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackcrow64
I write a lot... I wrote one song about this chick I was messing with that was uhhh... Well, lets just say I called it "Forbidden Love"


1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken
Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch

1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces
3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end

Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD

2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-15-2006, 02:10 PM
Thor06's Avatar
Thor06 Thor06 is offline
Jizzed In My Pants
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: What turbo is better?

I always wondered why SBR turbos seemed to be lower. How do you like that PTE? I am eyeing up a couple PTEs and I think that would probably be the better option for the thread starter.
__________________



Build on hold until I get a good paying job, either in school or once I get out. At that time a full tear down and complete rebuild should be in order.

The Purple People Eater will ride again... January 2011 can't come soon enough.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-15-2006, 02:18 PM
Mikelb's Avatar
Mikelb Mikelb is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mikelb
Re: What turbo is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor06
I always wondered why SBR turbos seemed to be lower. How do you like that PTE? I am eyeing up a couple PTEs and I think that would probably be the better option for the thread starter.
I do believe the PTE 50-trim is a bolt-on turbo for a DSM... it uses the DSM flange, but why would you want to do that?

Bolt-on a T3/T4 manifold, that'll leave you more options when you upgrade/swap turbos. I just think that's the better route.


I'll be honest, I was originally looking at the PTE(50), but I decided to not go that route, for aforementioned reason. I've heard decent things a/b their construction and reliability... as far as performance, I've never been close enough to one to see any hard data...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackcrow64
I write a lot... I wrote one song about this chick I was messing with that was uhhh... Well, lets just say I called it "Forbidden Love"


1991 Eagle Talon TSI - Broken
Head removed, block broken, trans in hatch

1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD- in pieces
3" exhaust, rebuilt bottom end

Project: Assemble the Eagle is underway... and now with AWD

2003 Lancer Evo 1630hp/1593ft lb tq
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Mitsubishi > Eclipse/Talon/Laser > Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts