-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-28-2006, 11:22 PM
ViperJ's Avatar
ViperJ ViperJ is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 832
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ViperJ
LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Well what are you guys opions on the above. I am looking for input from all of you guys, opions from people that own them good/bad.

I am looking for
-Cheapest (LT4 so far)
-Easiest to Install
-Best Power gains
-Overall opions

Basically I am eventually trying to get a 10.5 sec street car so give me your feedback
__________________
White 07 STI, Bone stock for now
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2006, 11:34 PM
poormillionaire2 poormillionaire2 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,723
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Going all-motor or forced induction both have their advantages and disadvantages.
As far as the LT4 package (assuming from GM; heads, cam, rockers..etc) it won't net you a 10 sec. street car. If you're going with a H/C package, you'll need a bigger set of heads and a bigger cam. You might as well spend the extra dough on something with a little more output than the LT4.
As far as the turbo vs blower debate, ultimately boost is boost. A stock LT1 can only handle 6 psi (8 psi intercooled, I believe), so anything more than that and you'll have to tear into the block and forge the internals.
Blowers are easier to install but are belt-driven and are limited to pulley sizes in relation to boost. Turbos are a little more complicated but theoretically can provide infinite boost. A twin turbo setup would probably be a little easier so you can run a turbo off each manifold, instead of crossing pipes to a single turbo. But they generate a lot of heat and take up a lot of underhood space. Unless you go with an STS rear-mount turbo kit. Which also have their proclaimed advantages/disadvantages, but I won't go there.

None are going to be cheap, and remember, boost places extra wear on the engine.
I think you should build a 383 stroker and get a nasty cam for that, instead of boost, but that's just me. Nothin like a 10 sec N/A street car.
__________________
Sold
1994 Camaro Z28


Current Car
2003 Monte Carlo SS


Sold
2009 Kawasaki Ninja 500R
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2006, 12:11 AM
Dyno247365's Avatar
Dyno247365 Dyno247365 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,858
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

LT4? You might as well get an LS1. No way, build up the LT1. They handle turbo really well, but I was thinking nitrous...but I'm being me right now.
__________________


1996 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L 5spd!!!
1987 Chevy Iroc-Z- -Needs a new cat
1992 Nissan 240sx 5spd- SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2006, 12:26 AM
Nate355RS's Avatar
Nate355RS Nate355RS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

10.5 is pretty stout, I think getting into those kind of numbers is going to be really hard on the stock internals. I vote for a N/A 396 stroker with a forged rotating assembly, worked over AFR 210 heads, and a cam with a duration around 250-260. Of course it would take some serious jack to put it together but a 10 sec car isn't going to be cheap anyway you look at it.
__________________


'91 RS, forged LT1, GTP heads, blower cam, AFR Hydra-Rev kit, ram air intake, SLP 1 3/4 headers and 3" y-pipe, 3" Dynomax exaust, Yank 2800 TT stall converter, Strange 3.73 gears with Zexel-Torsen LSD, ect, ect...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2006, 01:31 AM
Dyno247365's Avatar
Dyno247365 Dyno247365 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,858
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate355RS
10.5 is pretty stout, I think getting into those kind of numbers is going to be really hard on the stock internals. I vote for a N/A 396 stroker with a forged rotating assembly, worked over AFR 210 heads, and a cam with a duration around 250-260. Of course it would take some serious jack to put it together but a 10 sec car isn't going to be cheap anyway you look at it.
Usually how much power do you need for 10 seconds? I never actually figured it out.
__________________


1996 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L 5spd!!!
1987 Chevy Iroc-Z- -Needs a new cat
1992 Nissan 240sx 5spd- SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2006, 01:46 AM
stone_mound_camaro's Avatar
stone_mound_camaro stone_mound_camaro is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyno247365
Usually how much power do you need for 10 seconds? I never actually figured it out.
800ish
__________________

car audio guru...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2006, 01:54 AM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Boost is always a option but if you are going to start on your way to 10's. Build/stroke the motor to start with. It will give you a huge step farther and allow you to beef up the internals to possibly handle boost down the road. Not to mention that the amount of air pressure to create each PSI on a 383 + cubic inch engine is greater than it is on a 350. So a supercharger/turbo that lets say makes 6 PSI on a 350 may only make 4PSI on a 383 because of its more efficient allowance of digesting CFM.

This is good cause it allows you to run a more efficient turbo/blower while still meeting the possible lower pressure ratios of dealing with a higher compression engine and lets not forget the most important thing about boost. It is a multiplication of your base power. This means more of a base mean more of a improvement.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2006, 01:58 AM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by stone_mound_camaro
800ish
Damn, you must be calculating in for the worst driver ever . Depending on many factors but 600 flywheel horsepower 3500lb car is capable of making it into the 10's. A 800 horse flywheel horsepower car weighing the same could possibly just brush the 9's.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2006, 02:02 AM
ViperJ's Avatar
ViperJ ViperJ is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 832
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ViperJ
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Well so far so good, this is the kind of stuff I was looking for
__________________
White 07 STI, Bone stock for now
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2006, 10:59 AM
Nate355RS's Avatar
Nate355RS Nate355RS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

You can get into the 10s with a 350 ci but it's going to have to be a pretty aggressive setup. A 10 sec 350 is not going to be as near as streetable as a 10 sec 383-396. Of course every setup is different and a tame-ish 350 can go 10s but nitrous but on average more cubes = easier to run on street and make more power.
__________________


'91 RS, forged LT1, GTP heads, blower cam, AFR Hydra-Rev kit, ram air intake, SLP 1 3/4 headers and 3" y-pipe, 3" Dynomax exaust, Yank 2800 TT stall converter, Strange 3.73 gears with Zexel-Torsen LSD, ect, ect...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-29-2006, 11:28 AM
1986Z28's Avatar
1986Z28 1986Z28 is offline
Has a Camaro
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to 1986Z28
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
Damn, you must be calculating in for the worst driver ever . Depending on many factors but 600 flywheel horsepower 3500lb car is capable of making it into the 10's. A 800 horse flywheel horsepower car weighing the same could possibly just brush the 9's.
it would be close, id say 650 - 700 would put you mid 10's, but running mid 10's there other stuff to look at, ex: SFC's, cage, trans and rearend swap(12-bolt or 9") running mid 10's isnt hard but you also have to look at the rest of the car if you dont want a pretzel or a lot of vbroken parts!
__________________
Formerly Blownalcoholboy

1986 Z28, 400ci SBC, Twin borg warner billet S467 turbos, Reid case powerglide, Moser 9". Holley EFI, Boost Leash. 950RWHP on pump gas, 1200rwhp on race gas (22 psi)

Best ET 1/4: 8.35 @ 170mph (275 drag radial)
Best ET 1/8: 5.44 @ 132mph (275 drag radial)
Best 60': 1.31 on the back tires (275 drag radial)

AF User Rules/Guidelines

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...uidelines.html
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-29-2006, 11:58 AM
poormillionaire2 poormillionaire2 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,723
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

You also need to hook up well. Spinning is only good for burnouts.
But a stroker is a solid place to start and build a good platform. Boost or juice can always be added later on down the road.
__________________
Sold
1994 Camaro Z28


Current Car
2003 Monte Carlo SS


Sold
2009 Kawasaki Ninja 500R
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-02-2006, 07:01 PM
stone_mound_camaro's Avatar
stone_mound_camaro stone_mound_camaro is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
Damn, you must be calculating in for the worst driver ever . Depending on many factors but 600 flywheel horsepower 3500lb car is capable of making it into the 10's. A 800 horse flywheel horsepower car weighing the same could possibly just brush the 9's.
see...whenever someone says a number like 10..i think low 10...like 9-10 not high 10, like 10-11...my bad
__________________

car audio guru...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-02-2006, 07:04 PM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

LOL, I am the opposite. If I run a 10.99999999999999999999999 you will here me say my car is a 10 second car but technically I guess it would be.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-03-2006, 12:07 AM
viperh viperh is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 292
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to viperh Send a message via Yahoo to viperh
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
LOL, I am the opposite. If I run a 10.99999999999999999999999 you will here me say my car is a 10 second car but technically I guess it would be.
I agree with you.. You really need to weigh your options. Supercharger is usually cheaper than a turbo setup.. However Turbos use wasted energy where as superchargers use some of the engine's power to make power. Turbos In my opinion are more streetable that supercharger. (That's my opinion others will have the same or diffrent opinions). Regardless of the fact you need to plan if your going NA or forced induced now before you start buying parts. Come up with a plan on what you want before you start implementing it otherwise you'll waste a shit ton of money.

-Nate-
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts