|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Well what are you guys opions on the above. I am looking for input from all of you guys, opions from people that own them good/bad.
I am looking for -Cheapest (LT4 so far) -Easiest to Install -Best Power gains -Overall opions Basically I am eventually trying to get a 10.5 sec street car so give me your feedback
__________________
White 07 STI, Bone stock for now |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Going all-motor or forced induction both have their advantages and disadvantages.
As far as the LT4 package (assuming from GM; heads, cam, rockers..etc) it won't net you a 10 sec. street car. If you're going with a H/C package, you'll need a bigger set of heads and a bigger cam. You might as well spend the extra dough on something with a little more output than the LT4. As far as the turbo vs blower debate, ultimately boost is boost. A stock LT1 can only handle 6 psi (8 psi intercooled, I believe), so anything more than that and you'll have to tear into the block and forge the internals. Blowers are easier to install but are belt-driven and are limited to pulley sizes in relation to boost. Turbos are a little more complicated but theoretically can provide infinite boost. A twin turbo setup would probably be a little easier so you can run a turbo off each manifold, instead of crossing pipes to a single turbo. But they generate a lot of heat and take up a lot of underhood space. Unless you go with an STS rear-mount turbo kit. Which also have their proclaimed advantages/disadvantages, but I won't go there. None are going to be cheap, and remember, boost places extra wear on the engine. I think you should build a 383 stroker and get a nasty cam for that, instead of boost, but that's just me. Nothin like a 10 sec N/A street car. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
LT4? You might as well get an LS1. No way, build up the LT1. They handle turbo really well, but I was thinking nitrous...but I'm being me right now.
__________________
![]() 1996 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L 5spd!!! 1987 Chevy Iroc-Z- -Needs a new cat 1992 Nissan 240sx 5spd- SOLD |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
10.5 is pretty stout, I think getting into those kind of numbers is going to be really hard on the stock internals. I vote for a N/A 396 stroker with a forged rotating assembly, worked over AFR 210 heads, and a cam with a duration around 250-260. Of course it would take some serious jack to put it together but a 10 sec car isn't going to be cheap anyway you look at it.
__________________
![]() '91 RS, forged LT1, GTP heads, blower cam, AFR Hydra-Rev kit, ram air intake, SLP 1 3/4 headers and 3" y-pipe, 3" Dynomax exaust, Yank 2800 TT stall converter, Strange 3.73 gears with Zexel-Torsen LSD, ect, ect... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Quote:
__________________
![]() 1996 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L 5spd!!! 1987 Chevy Iroc-Z- -Needs a new cat 1992 Nissan 240sx 5spd- SOLD |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Quote:
__________________
![]() car audio guru...
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Boost is always a option but if you are going to start on your way to 10's. Build/stroke the motor to start with. It will give you a huge step farther and allow you to beef up the internals to possibly handle boost down the road. Not to mention that the amount of air pressure to create each PSI on a 383 + cubic inch engine is greater than it is on a 350. So a supercharger/turbo that lets say makes 6 PSI on a 350 may only make 4PSI on a 383 because of its more efficient allowance of digesting CFM.
This is good cause it allows you to run a more efficient turbo/blower while still meeting the possible lower pressure ratios of dealing with a higher compression engine and lets not forget the most important thing about boost. It is a multiplication of your base power. This means more of a base mean more of a improvement.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart. Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear) |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Quote:
Damn, you must be calculating in for the worst driver ever . Depending on many factors but 600 flywheel horsepower 3500lb car is capable of making it into the 10's. A 800 horse flywheel horsepower car weighing the same could possibly just brush the 9's.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart. Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear) |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Well so far so good, this is the kind of stuff I was looking for
__________________
White 07 STI, Bone stock for now |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
You can get into the 10s with a 350 ci but it's going to have to be a pretty aggressive setup. A 10 sec 350 is not going to be as near as streetable as a 10 sec 383-396. Of course every setup is different and a tame-ish 350 can go 10s but nitrous but on average more cubes = easier to run on street and make more power.
__________________
![]() '91 RS, forged LT1, GTP heads, blower cam, AFR Hydra-Rev kit, ram air intake, SLP 1 3/4 headers and 3" y-pipe, 3" Dynomax exaust, Yank 2800 TT stall converter, Strange 3.73 gears with Zexel-Torsen LSD, ect, ect... |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Quote:
__________________
Formerly Blownalcoholboy 1986 Z28, 400ci SBC, Twin borg warner billet S467 turbos, Reid case powerglide, Moser 9". Holley EFI, Boost Leash. 950RWHP on pump gas, 1200rwhp on race gas (22 psi) Best ET 1/4: 8.35 @ 170mph (275 drag radial) Best ET 1/8: 5.44 @ 132mph (275 drag radial) Best 60': 1.31 on the back tires (275 drag radial) AF User Rules/Guidelines http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...uidelines.html |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
You also need to hook up well. Spinning is only good for burnouts.
But a stroker is a solid place to start and build a good platform. Boost or juice can always be added later on down the road. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Quote:
__________________
![]() car audio guru...
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
LOL, I am the opposite. If I run a 10.99999999999999999999999 you will here me say my car is a 10 second car but technically I guess it would be.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart. Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear) |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LT4 vs Supercharger vs Turbo
Quote:
-Nate- |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|