|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain Discuss Engine, Transmission, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here. |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
09-10-2006, 04:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
2.3 strocker
hey i have a spare 4g63 laying around and i was thinking of doing the strocker kit then droping the engine in my car. if someone could tell me the plus and minus of the kit that would be great thanks
|
|
#2
09-10-2006, 04:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
Well with a 2.3 you get more displacement which means more power but you can't rev quite as high as a 2.0 but the difference is minimal. It will spool larger turbos faster than a 2.0. But It can be more expensive to build a 2.3 stroker, as opposed to just building it up as a 2.0
__________________
1991 GSX 2.3 Stroker
|
|
#3
09-10-2006, 04:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
Unless you are shooting for 600+ hp, I wouldnt.
__________________
 Build on hold until I get a good paying job, either in school or once I get out. At that time a full tear down and complete rebuild should be in order. The Purple People Eater will ride again... January 2011 can't come soon enough.
|
|
#4
09-10-2006, 04:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
okay so dont do it? and i was reading the desciptions of some of these kits and they r saying that ill red line at 8500 instead of 7000.
|
|
#5
09-10-2006, 05:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
If you plan on building a stroker then you better plan on getting DSMlink, and with that you can set the rev to whatever you want, so technically you rev to what you want. Like everyone else said, you'll have more displacement which will spool large turbos faster, but unless you're going for monster power, there isn't really a purpose in it. The stock 6-bolt will easily handle 450hp and 500+ if you know what you're doing.
__________________
95 Talon TSI AWD 97 Eclipse GST 
|
|
#6
09-10-2006, 06:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
I have a stroker and it's great. I say do it, it's not that much more than building a 2.0 block. My evoIII 16g spools instantly. The reving issue doesn't matter, if you think about it you will have to build the transmission for a higher reving 2.0. It's really up to you and where you want to go with your car...
__________________
95 GSX:FMIC, 6-bolt, evo 3 16g, 2600 act clutch, 1g bov (crushed), and a 3" turbo back exhaust, dsmlink, dks 272 cams, wideband 02, Coming soon 2.3L Stroker, 1mm oversized valves, crower sprigs. 91 TSI AWD auto, gm 3.5 maf, maft, fmic, emanage, profec e-01, 3" turbo bk exhaust +more little stuff. http://www.ratemydsm.com/member/ez1286/?member=ez1286  
|
|
#7
09-12-2006, 10:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
I'd go stroker without thinking about it. The stage 2 kit from sbr will handle over 900awhp and is less than $1500 with free shipping
__________________
 2004 Flame Red SRT-4 |Audiobahn 1200Q|Rockford 602s|Jensen flip out dvd| Mods: 
|
|
#8
09-12-2006, 10:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
 i would stroke so fast! the power/torque is sweet...
|
|
#9
09-12-2006, 10:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
Quote:
 That sounded so wrong. 
__________________
-Brian
|
|
#10
09-13-2006, 02:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
Quote:
|
|
#11
09-22-2006, 10:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
what one is better? 2.3 or 2.4 stroker? 2.3 is more commen i noticed.
__________________
Current Cars 2006 Eclipse GT 6 speed MT (V6 3.8), mods so far- S Tech Springs, after market 18's, 2012 headlight Conversion, Greddy cat back exhaust, CAI, RRE Headers, Polyurethane Motor Mounts, NX Nitrous kit at 100 shot for now, RPM Window Switch, Triple Pod. 2003 Grand AM GT - official beater car for the winter lol ---------------------------------------------------- 95 TSI AWD [email protected] (T-25) Now fully Modded engine with 3,560 miles on it.SOLD
|
|
#13
09-22-2006, 10:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
2.4 is more for high end torque i think? and 2.3 for better low end and better 1/4 mile?
EDIT* also is there any difference between the 6 and 7 bolt strokers since you are using different crank and bearings? Should not be any crankwalk issues in the 7 bolt block correct?
__________________
Current Cars 2006 Eclipse GT 6 speed MT (V6 3.8), mods so far- S Tech Springs, after market 18's, 2012 headlight Conversion, Greddy cat back exhaust, CAI, RRE Headers, Polyurethane Motor Mounts, NX Nitrous kit at 100 shot for now, RPM Window Switch, Triple Pod. 2003 Grand AM GT - official beater car for the winter lol ---------------------------------------------------- 95 TSI AWD [email protected] (T-25) Now fully Modded engine with 3,560 miles on it.SOLD
|
|
#14
09-22-2006, 11:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
are talking about the difference between a 4g63 storker and a 4g64 or a 2.4 4g63?
__________________
2004 Flame Red SRT-4 |Audiobahn 1200Q|Rockford 602s|Jensen flip out dvd| Mods:
|
|
#15
09-22-2006, 11:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2.3 strocker
um not sure lol, the 4g63 block as a 2.3 or a 2.4 stroker
NO crankwalk issues tho to worry about since you are using different crank and bearings?
__________________
Current Cars 2006 Eclipse GT 6 speed MT (V6 3.8), mods so far- S Tech Springs, after market 18's, 2012 headlight Conversion, Greddy cat back exhaust, CAI, RRE Headers, Polyurethane Motor Mounts, NX Nitrous kit at 100 shot for now, RPM Window Switch, Triple Pod. 2003 Grand AM GT - official beater car for the winter lol ---------------------------------------------------- 95 TSI AWD [email protected] (T-25) Now fully Modded engine with 3,560 miles on it.SOLD
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
