|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Quality Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Flo' Park, New York
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Dauer 962 LeMans vs. Koenigsegg CCX Top End
Hey, I've got a question for you guys....The Koenigsegg CC supposedly has a drag coefficient of .30, making it the most aerodynamic car in the world. And its got a 806 hp engine that can drive the car to 240 mph. Now the Dauer 962LeMans has less horsepower(750 hp), but it reaches just over 250 mph. So my question to you is that... Is the 962LM more aerodynamic than the very aerodynamicly styled CC?
Looking at both cars I'd say that the CC is more aerodynamic because of its cleaner shape ![]() but the 962's got less hp and hits 251, so I'm thinking its got to be alot smoother than a CC....and well, is it?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Razor Sharp Twit
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: london
Posts: 5,865
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
|
Re: Dauer 962 LeMans vs. Koenigsegg CCX Top End
Quote:
quite a few cars have a lower CD figure.
__________________
AF's Guidelines Read them. __________________ ![]() Currently in the process of re-hosting my photos. If any go missing, drop me a PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Flo' Park, New York
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Dauer 962 LeMans vs. Koenigsegg CCX Top End
oh, true I forgot about cars like the '89 Calibra which had a cd of .26, and others, but anyway I'm sorry, what I meant was that the CC is pretty aerodynamic when compared with other supercars like the Enzo (.35 cd) or Carrera GT (.39 cd). So, Is the 962 faster because its more aerodynamic?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pacific, Washington
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Dauer 962 LeMans vs. Koenigsegg CCX Top End
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo ![]() Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
CFA
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Dauer 962 LeMans vs. Koenigsegg CCX Top End
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Flo' Park, New York
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Dauer 962 LeMans vs. Koenigsegg CCX Top End
Quote:
Thats a good point, about gearing, and the car's powerband. Even with less hp, and less gears the 962 accelerates harder and goes faster.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Razor Sharp Twit
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: london
Posts: 5,865
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
|
Re: Dauer 962 LeMans vs. Koenigsegg CCX Top End
i'm sorry but i have to close this because it can only go downhill from here.
as usual, if there are any problems or questions about this, PM me and i'll get back to you.
__________________
AF's Guidelines Read them. __________________ ![]() Currently in the process of re-hosting my photos. If any go missing, drop me a PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|