|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was just wondering the horsepower and torque of a 5.2L?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.2l
Depends on the year.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.2l
I believe it's a 93
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.2l
230hp @4800 rpm
280ft lbs @ 3200 rpm |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.2l
i doubt those are acurate on a 93 because every motor is treated defrently defrent conditions so odds are it will be less than stated above
__________________
Crop circles are Chuck Norris way of telling the world that sometimes corn needs to lie the fuck down The Great Wall of China was originally created to keep Chuck Norris out It failed miserably A Handicapped parking sign does not signify that this spot is for handicapped people. It is actually in fact a warning that the spot belongs to Chuck Norris and that you will be handicapped if you park there When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night he checks his closet for Chuck Norris |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.2l
That is the published specs by Dodge.
The '93 Dak with 3.92 gears and Auto would do 0-60 in 7.2 secs. So even if the HP and TQ specs aren't accurate, the performance is. My Dad bought one of this brand new and you could lay serious rubber with this thing, even with the Posi. In '94 the HP was reduced to 220@4400. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.2l
Quote:
The horsepower numbers were never reduced in 1994. They remained at 230 all the way to the end of the Magnum engine production.
__________________
My Mopars |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5.2l
no they were reduced to 220.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|