|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
engines
i don't know if this is the right place to put this so the mods can move it if they feel like they should.
anyways, i was thinkin today that one day we will run out of oil. there's no denying it. if we don't pursue electric vehicles or other ways to run cars that do NOT require the use of oil. i started to think, is there a diesel/hybrid vehicle on the market or a concept car? has anyone ever thought of making one? i was thinking that if they are going to be made or something, then in theory couldn't you buy the modification kit to make the diesel engine run on vegetable oil? that way it would not require oil for the gas part of the car. you would still need oil to lubricate parts though but it's one more step. any thoughts? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
they do make electric cars. 2 they is a prtotype of a hydrogen car, and most desials can run on more then desial ie: bio desial which is made from heated up shorting/ veggy oil.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: engines
I believe there is a diesel hybrid on the market, i heard about one a while back but i don't remember who made it. it is very possible to make it and it makes much more sense that a gasoline hybrid because diesels are already better for gas mileage.
__________________
Mr. T doesn't pity anyone who likes the Black Eyed Peas. He just kills them. Mr. T speaks only when necessary. His main form of communication is folding his arms and slowly shaking his head. And regardless of the situation, he is always understood. On the A-team, Face , Haniabal, and Murdoch were all masters of disguise. Mr T didn't have to wear a disguise. The bad guys didn't recognize him out of fear. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: engines
the problem with a diesel hybrid is that they make no power up at the top of the powerband as both diesel and electric motors are high-torque, low horsepower.
the gas-electric engine is better balanced. There currently are no commercially produced diesel-electric hybrid cars.
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: engines
but horsepower doesn't really matter when you're looking for fuel economy. i'd say it's a better idea than a gasoline-electric hybrid in terms of fuel economy. now i don't really think hybrids are all that great but that's a completely diffrent discussion.
__________________
Mr. T doesn't pity anyone who likes the Black Eyed Peas. He just kills them. Mr. T speaks only when necessary. His main form of communication is folding his arms and slowly shaking his head. And regardless of the situation, he is always understood. On the A-team, Face , Haniabal, and Murdoch were all masters of disguise. Mr T didn't have to wear a disguise. The bad guys didn't recognize him out of fear. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
There are a few prototype diesel hybrids, but no production ones.
One issue that needs to be worked through is the oil supply to the turbo. The engine might be required to start and stop often while the turbo has to be kept cool while spooling down. A seperate oil supply would keep it spinning, but it's more space and cost. Of course an idling diesel doesn't use as much fuel as an idling petrol so maybe keeping them running is an option. IMO petrol hybrids are just practice, there's no point when a straight diesel powered car is more efficient, more economical and doesn't need the space penalty, weight and cost of a battery pack. A diesel hybrid could get truely impressive fuel economy around urban areas, but on the open road hybrids are a lose-lose situation. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
And even then......the most efficient hybrid cars like the Toyota Prius for instance still come at a price premium that doesn't quite compensate its added cost at the pump compared to most fuel efficient non hybrid vehicles, that is, unless you plan on keeping them for over 100+k miles (and even then, a diesel engine would still more than likely be the winner).
__________________
Your powerband ends at 6?.....funny...... ![]() thats when mine starts. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
So wouldn't the percentage of fuel saved be the same? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
We also wont run out of oil, the problem is that there will come a time when the oil is so expensive that we really can't afford it as an option. Run diesels on vegetable oil isn't a good idea either, the emissions aren't that good but more importantly vegetable oil can never replace fossil fuels, we can't simply make enough of it. We can use the vegetable oil that we currently have, this oil is best used by converting it into esters which are added to diesel fuel in a small amount. Today we use huge amounts of fossil fuels and to replace these won't be simple. To replace all fossil fuel we essentially have to build 10,000 new powerplants (hydro, nuclear and similar) of the largest size currently possible. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
The energy reclaimed in braking and released on acceleration by the hybrid system is the same regardless of what type of IC motor is bolted in. Hence the overall energy savings are the same. Hybrid diesels haven't been released for sale because they're harder to make. Research diesel hybrid vehicles are out there as cars, light trucks and heavy trucks. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
Regenerative braking is more of a bonus with the electric hybrid system as electric motors can be used as generators. However, battery systems have difficulties with the high amps generated by regenerative braking so the efficiency isn't that high. For a pure braking energy recovery system there are other options, both flywheels and supercapacitors are much better than batteries to store large amount of energy when the charging rate is high. Hybrid or not, if you increase the weight of any car the fuel consumption will go up, generally by 0.3-0.5 liter/100 km per 100 kg extra weight. Currently all hybrid vehicles have an energy consumption per mile that is higher than an equally sized conventional car, the energy required to manufacture, maintain and recycle the hybrid system is higher than the energy saved by it in the form of fuel. With a diesel the saving caused by the hybrid system will be even smaller so currently I don't see any real benefits with it! |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
In open road situations a hybrid is at fuel consumption disadvantage compared to a conventional vehicle powered by the same IC engine. Compare the energy required to accelerate a car to 50km/h (approx 150 kJ) vs the power required to cruise at 50km/h (less than 10kw). Each stop/go cycle is a major drain. You can expect fuel consumption to increase linearly in stop/go situations as weight increases. Running the engine at a higher load can be achieved without a seperate electric motor/generator and battery pack. But it's a redundant argument as diesels are more efficient than petrols in their entire load/speed range. Are you aware that BMW's diesels weigh only a fraction (6kg for example) more than their equivalent petrol? Your extra weight comment is groundless, especially in a car carrying around a few hundred kg of battery. The fact that conventional diesel cars already beat petrol/electric hybrids for combined cycle fuel economy indicates the petrol/electric cars are only a stop-gap measure. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On a hybrid system the engine can simply be shut down during low load conditions that mostly occur during urban driving. How the engine is used is a major reason for fuel saving of a gasoline-hybrid but it will be a minor reason for fuel saving for a diesel-hybrid. In other words, the diesel-hybrid will not be that much better than a conventional diesel when it comes to fuel consumption. The conventional diesel will then require much less energy for production/maintenance/recycling so in overall it will be a better option. At least in the near future. Quote:
The weight of the battery pack is no exception. The weight of the complete hybrid drivetrain must be compared with the weight of a complete conventional drivetrain. The one that is heavier will see an increase in fuel consumption due to this reason. This means that a hybrid system, if it's heavier than a conventional drivetrain must offer other fuel saving advantages to overcome the weight disadvantage. Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
Quote:
so would like to make awareness of a my start-up company, Alternate Propulsion Motor Co. This company is gearing up to create hybrid / EV conversions for existing vehicles. The idea is to replace the cars internal combustion engine with our own gas-electric hybrid, PHEV, or Full electric. We are currently engineering our prototypes and preparing our products to meet your needs. Our goal is to have products available by late 2007. We would like your input as to best accomplish this. Anyone reading this is invited to participate in our Hybrid Vehicle Conversion Survey, located at http://alternatepropulsion.com/index.php?page=3. This will give us ideas on how to better engineer our products. Be honest, and let us know what would best serve the future hybrid/automotive community. Thanks. - Dave |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: engines
Toyota have completely worked every aspect of the prius to get any fuel economy advantage they can.
From special tyres with a lower rolling resistance, to the atkinson cycle engine with bores offset to the side of the power stroke. A prius without the battery pack and generator would do better on the open road than a hybrid prius. Quote:
Just like every other hybrid.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|