-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Caprice
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-28-2006, 12:29 PM
FreshBubble FreshBubble is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Camaro Engine

Would a 5.7L 94-96 Camaro engine fit in a 94 Caprice Classic?

Because I have a friend whose dad runs a junkyard that can get me one in decent condition (I think he said the engine had 80k miles on it) for 700-800.

Does anyone know if it would fit in my Caprice, and if it would work well?
__________________
1994 Chevrolet Caprice Classic 4.3L
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2006, 12:46 PM
1986Z28's Avatar
1986Z28 1986Z28 is offline
Has a Camaro
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to 1986Z28
Re: Camaro Engine

if its a lt1, then yes with some modifications
__________________
Formerly Blownalcoholboy

1986 Z28, 400ci SBC, Twin borg warner billet S467 turbos, Reid case powerglide, Moser 9". Holley EFI, Boost Leash. 950RWHP on pump gas, 1200rwhp on race gas (22 psi)

Best ET 1/4: 8.35 @ 170mph (275 drag radial)
Best ET 1/8: 5.44 @ 132mph (275 drag radial)
Best 60': 1.31 on the back tires (275 drag radial)

AF User Rules/Guidelines

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...uidelines.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2006, 01:31 PM
FreshBubble FreshBubble is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Camaro Engine

Well Im looking on their website that they have of things in stock, and the Camaro engine says its a 94 Camaro engine 5.7L RWD, so Im assuming the 8 cyl 5.7 WOULD be an Lt1. Correct me if Im wrong..this is the first Chevy car I've owned, so Im not too sure.

The Camaro engines also have more HP than the LT1 engines in Impalas and Caprice 9C1's from what I heard. I think they have like 300 something HP opposed to the Impala or 9C1's 265 HP.

Do you know what modifications I might have to make in order for the engine to work?
__________________
1994 Chevrolet Caprice Classic 4.3L
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2006, 04:01 PM
broughy84's Avatar
broughy84 broughy84 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Re: Camaro Engine

The only difference is that the camaro LT1 had aluminum heads, the caprice LT1 had Cast Iron.
__________________
Matthew Brough
1997 Geo Prizm -- 301,000 miles
2000 Honda Accord -- 225,000 miles
2004 GMC Yukon XL -- 223,000 miles

1987 Jeep Comanche -- 116,000 miles


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2006, 06:21 PM
1986Z28's Avatar
1986Z28 1986Z28 is offline
Has a Camaro
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to 1986Z28
Re: Camaro Engine

beat me to it dammit, if your 94 is already a lt1 car it should just bolt right in
__________________
Formerly Blownalcoholboy

1986 Z28, 400ci SBC, Twin borg warner billet S467 turbos, Reid case powerglide, Moser 9". Holley EFI, Boost Leash. 950RWHP on pump gas, 1200rwhp on race gas (22 psi)

Best ET 1/4: 8.35 @ 170mph (275 drag radial)
Best ET 1/8: 5.44 @ 132mph (275 drag radial)
Best 60': 1.31 on the back tires (275 drag radial)

AF User Rules/Guidelines

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...uidelines.html
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2006, 09:40 PM
silicon212's Avatar
silicon212 silicon212 is offline
Confoundingly Lucid
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,901
Thanks: 5
Thanked 31 Times in 31 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to silicon212
Re: Camaro Engine

Quote:
Originally Posted by blownalcoholboy
beat me to it dammit, if your 94 is already a lt1 car it should just bolt right in
And if it's the 4.3 in his sig, he's going to need a 5.7l PCM as well.
__________________
1988 9C1 - Modified LM1 @ 275HP/350TQ - TH700R4 - 3.08 8.5" Disc Rear - see it at http://www.silicon212.org/9c1!
2005 Crown Vic P71 - former AZ DPS - 4.6 liters of pure creamy slothness!
1967 El Camino L79/M20 old school asphalt raper

Remember - a government that is strong enough to give you everything you need, is also strong enough to take everything you have.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:05 AM
1986Z28's Avatar
1986Z28 1986Z28 is offline
Has a Camaro
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to 1986Z28
Re: Camaro Engine

ahha good point, so what im blind
__________________
Formerly Blownalcoholboy

1986 Z28, 400ci SBC, Twin borg warner billet S467 turbos, Reid case powerglide, Moser 9". Holley EFI, Boost Leash. 950RWHP on pump gas, 1200rwhp on race gas (22 psi)

Best ET 1/4: 8.35 @ 170mph (275 drag radial)
Best ET 1/8: 5.44 @ 132mph (275 drag radial)
Best 60': 1.31 on the back tires (275 drag radial)

AF User Rules/Guidelines

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...uidelines.html
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-29-2006, 10:19 AM
96capricemgr 96capricemgr is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 360
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Camaro Engine

Yes it will drop right in, BUT if you can find one from a b-body it will be cheaper and have better lowend than the f-body motor. People get hungup on the f-body crap when reality is the early aluminum heads flowed LESS than all the irons. Yes they make a little more peak HP BUT a little LESS peak torque and do so at a higher rpm AND do so with 91 octane tuning as opposed to the 87 the b-body got and they had freer flowing intake and exhaust since the b-body needed to be grandpa quiet. My theory is they intentionally weakened lowend torque on the f-body to save the weak 7.5" axle, the LT1 b-body got the 8.5" so they set the motor up for max torque as is needed for a big heavy car.
A civi L99 car will probably have that crappy 7.5" it will be OK behind an LT1 as long as you don't try to put a posi in it. It takes traction to kill and without posi traction isn't going to happen, the 8.5" axle is again a direct boltin just need the driveshaft that goes with it.
On the pcm the L99 used the same hardware just the software inside is different so get yours reprogrammed, the f-body pcm is the same part too but the software is again different and besides the speedo being way off your AC would not work without reprogramming it.
If the f-body motor is a 94 then you will need to swap the timing cover and opti over to the vented ones on your car, as well as the damper hub.
If the donor is a 96 then it has the right timing cover and opti but you will have to pull them so you can get rid of the CPS reluctor and put on your balancer hub.
onsider a Transgo shift kit in the trany too since the L99 trannies were put together a little weaker than the LT1 trannies, Vette servo and boost valve being the big differences.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Caprice


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts