-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-15-2006, 08:12 PM
1FASTws6 1FASTws6 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
13.0???

What would a 98 trans am with just and exhaust, lid, intake, and some work on EFIlive (friends hardware) run?? I was thinking 12.8- 13.0?? Any inputs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2006, 08:20 PM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

If you are lucky.
What tires?
Are you driving or is someone that is used to the track driving?
It is completely different than the street.
I would say 13.0-13.3. All depends on the launch.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2006, 08:41 PM
1FASTws6 1FASTws6 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

Yeah im driving, i still hafta practice launching like u said. Launch is the crutail part. I dont have DR's or anything.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2006, 09:00 PM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

13.3-13.6
Probably the lower half of that.

What changes have been made using EFILive?
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2006, 11:36 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 13.0???

Curtis, l thought maybe LS1s run low 13s even l heard some people ran 13 flat.. he is not an experienced driver thats why u say 13.3 or13.6?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2006, 11:46 PM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

It takes PERFECT conditions to run that 13.0 with a stock car. Weather has to be perfect, track prepped well, car running strong that night, etc...
Someone that can pull off a 1.9-2.0 60 foot time and shift QUICKLY.

Most stock LS1 F-Body's run 13.5-14.0.

My best 60 foot time was 2.139 on street tires. Might give you an idea.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:14 AM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 13.0???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Luos
It takes PERFECT conditions to run that 13.0 with a stock car. Weather has to be perfect, track prepped well, car running strong that night, etc...
Someone that can pull off a 1.9-2.0 60 foot time and shift QUICKLY.

Most stock LS1 F-Body's run 13.5-14.0.

My best 60 foot time was 2.139 on street tires. Might give you an idea.
wow!!! l didnt know that.. so, if an 80k miles LS1 would dyno, how much horses would it push at the wheels and flywheel..

l would love to know anything about LS1s.. cuz l just got paid and put into my savings account, l hope this gives an idea why l wanna know..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:18 AM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

80 thousand miles the motor will probably start showing slightly lower numbers.
It all depends on how well the car was kept up. How hard it was driven, stuff like that.

I would say a 2001-2002 6-speed LS1 F-Body with 80K miles would still dyno around 310 RWHP.
Might lose a couple horse over the next 20K miles, might not.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:24 AM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 13.0???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Luos
80 thousand miles the motor will probably start showing slightly lower numbers.
It all depends on how well the car was kept up. How hard it was driven, stuff like that.

I would say a 2001-2002 6-speed LS1 F-Body with 80K miles would still dyno around 310 RWHP.
Might lose a couple horse over the next 20K miles, might not.
how about 98-99?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2006, 03:32 AM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

Little bit lower.
Maybe 295-305 RWHP if the car has the 6-speed.

I don't believe any year was any better, at least for longivity. The one year they say to avoid is the 1998's. If you can anyways.

My 1999 car made 320 RWHP with just lid and catback, which I guess is pretty stout for a 1999. When modded...it just doesn't matter.
And dyno numbers are just that....numbers. Great tuning tool, not always exactly a good figure as to how the car runs.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-16-2006, 04:18 AM
2000LS1Z28 2000LS1Z28 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,191
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

Your track times will all depend on the track you go to. The track I go to is at 1300 ft. elevation, so it has thinner air then say E Town. When I did the 1/4 mile in my car the best 60' I could manage was a 2.107 on drag radials With that, and literally nailing every shift I ran a 13.1 sec. 1/4 mile at 109 mph. That was at an estimated 2000 DA, so the car was barely in the 12's using the formula.

When the car was close to stock I cut a 2.2 sec. 60' on street tires, and ran a 13.7 sec. 1/4 mile at 104mph, at the same track.

I'd say that you would run a 13.5 sec. 1/4 mile at sea level. The people that post 12.8-13.0 sec. 1/4 miles typically leave out alot of factors, such as negative density altitude and ridiculous track prep.
__________________
2001 MR2 Spyder
Magnaflow Muffler and OBX CAI.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:11 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 13.0???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Luos
Little bit lower.
Maybe 295-305 RWHP if the car has the 6-speed.

I don't believe any year was any better, at least for longivity. The one year they say to avoid is the 1998's. If you can anyways.

My 1999 car made 320 RWHP with just lid and catback, which I guess is pretty stout for a 1999. When modded...it just doesn't matter.
And dyno numbers are just that....numbers. Great tuning tool, not always exactly a good figure as to how the car runs.
well it is good to know these..

thanks Curtis..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-17-2006, 11:06 PM
lt1andls1 lt1andls1 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1FASTws6
What would a 98 trans am with just and exhaust, lid, intake, and some work on EFIlive (friends hardware) run?? I was thinking 12.8- 13.0?? Any inputs
LS1 m6 stock:13.1 on stree tires
stock on nittos 12.9

If its an M6 you can pull it off. Got to bang thrue those gears though.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-18-2006, 09:24 PM
DarkblueTA's Avatar
DarkblueTA DarkblueTA is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 410
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DarkblueTA
Re: 13.0???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Luos
Little bit lower.
Maybe 295-305 RWHP if the car has the 6-speed.

I don't believe any year was any better, at least for longivity. The one year they say to avoid is the 1998's. If you can anyways.

My 1999 car made 320 RWHP with just lid and catback, which I guess is pretty stout for a 1999. When modded...it just doesn't matter.
And dyno numbers are just that....numbers. Great tuning tool, not always exactly a good figure as to how the car runs.

watch the 98 comment there buddy, You may have more cubes but I have boost backing me up.
__________________
DarkblueTA

GT70, FMIC, Alky-water injection, Hooker Cat back, 208/230 .549/.579 121LSA Cam, forged diamond pistons/eagle rods, LS6 block, Lakewood LCAs, BMR STB/PHRB/Sway Bars, poly torque arm bushing, Spec Stage 4i clutch, B&M Ripper Shifter, SLP Subframes, 60# injectors, KYB AGX shocks/struts, Moser 12 bolt(373 gears, 33 spline axles, posi, ta girdle/etc/etc/etc) and HPTuner kit

2007 Nissan Titan Daily Driver. 2* advance

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-18-2006, 09:38 PM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 13.0???

Hey...I have a friend here that just popped off a 10.8 at 137 here with his 1998 Z-28.
I don't have any personal experience with the 1998 being a bad year, just heard that a couple times.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts