|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Off-Topic Talk about anything other than cars. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
dsmlink Vs. ecu+
Dsmlink Vs ecu+
ive been doing research on both http://dsmlink.com/ and http://ecuplus.com/ and i seriously cant decide. Ecu+ does not need an ecu, plug and play. anybody dealed with ecu+ before?
__________________
-1997 Eclipse Spyder GST |Stock| -1990 Eclipse GSX |ACL Main & Rod Race Bearings|Balance Shafts Removed|ARP Head Studs|Cometic HG|FP 20g TDO6H|EPROM Chipped (stutter box 5k, fuel comp.)|PTE 680cc inj.|Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump|Autoteq FPR|SAFC 2|FMIC|2g MAF|Dejon Tool Hard Pipe|Greddy Type S|MBC at 17PSI|Ported 2g Exhaust Manifold|02 Housing w/ Tial 38mm WG|Full 3inch Exhaust w/ Y-pipe Cutout|Fidanza Flywheel|ACT 2100|4 Bolt LSD Rear|Poly Mounts|KYB AGX Suspension|Roll Bar| |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
Well if you do not have a EPROM ecu do it and let the ones here know how it works. That would be the cheaper way to go. I paid $605 shipped to my house for my dsmlink from dsmlink.com of course and ,my car allready had the eprom ecu in it.
__________________
Current Cars 2006 Eclipse GT 6 speed MT (V6 3.8), mods so far- S Tech Springs, after market 18's, 2012 headlight Conversion, Greddy cat back exhaust, CAI, RRE Headers, Polyurethane Motor Mounts, NX Nitrous kit at 100 shot for now, RPM Window Switch, Triple Pod. 2003 Grand AM GT - official beater car for the winter lol ---------------------------------------------------- 95 TSI AWD [email protected] (T-25) Now fully Modded engine with 3,560 miles on it.SOLD |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
I say dsmlink all the way, but if you prefer that go for it and let us know.
__________________
95 GSX:FMIC, 6-bolt, evo 3 16g, 2600 act clutch, 1g bov (crushed), and a 3" turbo back exhaust, dsmlink, dks 272 cams, wideband 02, Coming soon 2.3L Stroker, 1mm oversized valves, crower sprigs. 91 TSI AWD auto, gm 3.5 maf, maft, fmic, emanage, profec e-01, 3" turbo bk exhaust +more little stuff. http://www.ratemydsm.com/member/ez1286/?member=ez1286
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
thats the thing, i dont want to be the $600 plus guinea pig. i want to know if anybody use ecu+.
__________________
-1997 Eclipse Spyder GST |Stock| -1990 Eclipse GSX |ACL Main & Rod Race Bearings|Balance Shafts Removed|ARP Head Studs|Cometic HG|FP 20g TDO6H|EPROM Chipped (stutter box 5k, fuel comp.)|PTE 680cc inj.|Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump|Autoteq FPR|SAFC 2|FMIC|2g MAF|Dejon Tool Hard Pipe|Greddy Type S|MBC at 17PSI|Ported 2g Exhaust Manifold|02 Housing w/ Tial 38mm WG|Full 3inch Exhaust w/ Y-pipe Cutout|Fidanza Flywheel|ACT 2100|4 Bolt LSD Rear|Poly Mounts|KYB AGX Suspension|Roll Bar| |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
Quote:
__________________
95 GSX:FMIC, 6-bolt, evo 3 16g, 2600 act clutch, 1g bov (crushed), and a 3" turbo back exhaust, dsmlink, dks 272 cams, wideband 02, Coming soon 2.3L Stroker, 1mm oversized valves, crower sprigs. 91 TSI AWD auto, gm 3.5 maf, maft, fmic, emanage, profec e-01, 3" turbo bk exhaust +more little stuff. http://www.ratemydsm.com/member/ez1286/?member=ez1286
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
dsmlink is MUCH better. first off, you can change it without sending it back to them. To tune with ECU+ you still need an SAFC for the minor changes to get a really good tune. DSMLink does everything and more, and you can change the settings as you wish
__________________
now - 2000 civic soon - 2002 is300
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
my friend ran ecu+ in his talon and he loved it. It has a built in maft to. And crunchy, he didnt need to send his out every time and he didnt have an acf either. I'm kind of thinking megasquirt myself
__________________
2004 Flame Red SRT-4 |Audiobahn 1200Q|Rockford 602s|Jensen flip out dvd| Mods: ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
DSMLink all the way... The support and knowledge out there for DSMLink beats ECU+ and Megasquirt by far.
Megasquirt blows... Why would you get that when there is DSMLink or AEM. Yes, AEM is more exspensive but again, almost everyone that tunes cars is familiar with AEM. Very few people know megasquirt and the support blows compaired to anything else. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
well from what I've heard first hand from users of ecu+ is that the support is awsome and they would use it over dsm link any day. I myslef have not made any decisions as of yet
__________________
2004 Flame Red SRT-4 |Audiobahn 1200Q|Rockford 602s|Jensen flip out dvd| Mods: ![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
yeah i searched on dsmtuners, and found people with it that liked it. so i dont know. it kind of has built in dyno also. http://www.ecuplus.com/featsdyn.htm
__________________
-1997 Eclipse Spyder GST |Stock| -1990 Eclipse GSX |ACL Main & Rod Race Bearings|Balance Shafts Removed|ARP Head Studs|Cometic HG|FP 20g TDO6H|EPROM Chipped (stutter box 5k, fuel comp.)|PTE 680cc inj.|Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump|Autoteq FPR|SAFC 2|FMIC|2g MAF|Dejon Tool Hard Pipe|Greddy Type S|MBC at 17PSI|Ported 2g Exhaust Manifold|02 Housing w/ Tial 38mm WG|Full 3inch Exhaust w/ Y-pipe Cutout|Fidanza Flywheel|ACT 2100|4 Bolt LSD Rear|Poly Mounts|KYB AGX Suspension|Roll Bar| |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
ECU+ is practically an AFC. Still piggyback. Though I do recall it may adjust timing after the ECU. I've posted about this before, and forgot more about it that I know about DSMlink, so if you can find those older posts they may be helpful. There is no way in hell it is better than DSMlink, though I reserve the right to be proven wrong.
__________________
Kevin Jewer RWD Talon - 7.92 at 180 Mightymax - 10.7 at 125 |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dsmlink Vs. ecu+
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|