|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Exterior and Wheels This is the place for all exterior wheel modifcations. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hampstead, Maryland
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Which taillight configuration looks better?
So I ordered the JDM taillights off ebay. I put on the two side lights but am leaving the middle piece out and just thinking about keeping it stock in the center. I could paint the same color red as the rest of my car and logo or I could just keep it like it is (darker red) or maybe do a black center with logo. Please tell me which you think looks better.
A ![]() or B ![]() or C ![]() or None of the Above Thanks
__________________
![]() '98 GS Spyder No major mods as of yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Newbie
![]() |
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
Im going to say the center piece painted red, same as the car. The other two just dont look right to me.
__________________
97 gs-t: Guages: boost, oil pressure and temp, water temp and volts. AEM cam gears, short throw shifter, hks ssqv, injen intake, brembo drilled rotors, akebono ceramic pads, sportline springs & koni ajustables, Strut bars: front, rear and lower rear tie bar. Evo III manifold and o2, megan downpipe, Apexi N1 catback, 16g, 190 fuel pump and FMIC. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Merrimac, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
B looks the best, but the unpainted looks close. Don't go with C.
__________________
'92 3000gt SL Zoom Stage 1 Clutch Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: north port, Florida
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
I think you should get the b. Its lookes the best on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
none of the above
on a read 2gdsm, stock taillights and painting the center to match the car looks amazing. It looks best in red.
__________________
now - 2000 civic soon - 2002 is300
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: dallas, Texas
Posts: 2,431
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
I like A, but stock tail light look the best ( just my
).
__________________
GM FOR LIFE !! NEW 1997 Camaro z28 6 speed illa never going back to import , but killa alway be nice to any DSM he saw ![]() looking for 2002 Trans Am LSX UPGRATE 2010 !! 97 Camaro Z28 95 camaro lt1 1992 Pontiac Firebird v6 auto -sold - Pony 1998 Mustang GT 4.6L Manual. Black 1995 Eagle Talon TSI AWD Turbo manual R.I.P 1994 Mitsubishi Eclipse Manual gray -Sold 1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse RS Auto White - Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
None.
I love the stockers with the middle piece painted to match the body. I would do it to mine, but since I have the dark red metallic color, the stock unpainted middle piece already looks like it
__________________
![]() 2006 Wicked White Evo IX GSR 323 awhp / 311 tq. (Dynojet) http://www.projectevoix.com http://www.4WStuning.com 99 RS < 98 GSX < 06 EVO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
sell your after market tail lights and get new ones.....those are mine no fair
__________________
![]() 96 GS - 5 Speed-Sold 1998 Ford F-150 XLT 4X4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hampstead, Maryland
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
Alright those were all great responses, thanks guys. Turns out, I went out today and got primer, paint and clearcoat. I took the middle taillight piece (JDM) and sanded it with 600 grit, 2 coats of primer, 3 coats of color, 3 coats of clearcoat. It looks fantastic! I've never spray painted anything that looked that good before. When everything dried to touch, I put it next to my car and realized that I had the wrong color
It was a shade lighter (and more orange looking) than the color of my car. I feel like a retard I did check later on and my color code is R87 (Radiant Fire). For those of you who don't know, the color code is on the sitcker on the passanger side on the firewall. I may go out and find this paint and try again but I feel like a dumbass. Dunno, maybe I'll just leave it be with the stock center piece in there. I just am getting kinda bored with the stock taillights (sides) even though they do look pretty descent. I just need something different for a change. I'm done my book now. p.s. Haha, did anyone notice the horrible job I did blurring out my license plate. That's a 1 minute photoshop for ya.
__________________
![]() '98 GS Spyder No major mods as of yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
none,
paint center with stock like me. Altezzas are gay. No ricer is complete without then. They are just way over done and played out. and look chezzy ![]()
__________________
![]() Something new is coming... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hampstead, Maryland
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
Alright, I recovered from my mistake in picking the wrong color.
I went out got the right color, repainted last night and finished putting new badging on. Here's the final result.![]() ![]() I think this looks really great in person (pat self on back). Plus I really haven't seen anybody with this same type of configuration. I also think that when you paint the center, that the eclipse badging should be left on, it just looks kinda weird without it.
__________________
![]() '98 GS Spyder No major mods as of yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Merrimac, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
I like the way it looks with the new tails, it seems to fit your car.
__________________
'92 3000gt SL Zoom Stage 1 Clutch Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
I think it looks good, I like stock better. But those are the only aftermarket lights that I think look good. Good job.
__________________
Got AWD? Some people buy super cars, other build them ![]() ----Click It, For Mods and Pics---- '95 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX - For Sale '05 Volkwagen Golf GLS TDI - My daily driver '03 Ford Excursion 6.0L PSD 4x4 '13 Ford F150 FX4 SCREW 4x4 3.5L EcoBoost '08 Buell 1125R '83 GMC Sierra Classic K2500 4x4 - Future Cummins Swap |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
yeah i think it looks decent. i def like my stockers better. But i do know someone here in town with the same exact set up on a converted tallon tsi awd. his car is the same color too...
__________________
![]() Something new is coming... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Which taillight configuration looks better?
sorry, but your taillights aren't "JDM". The Eclipse wasn't sold in Japan and if it was, it would just be the same as USDM taillights but with yellow turn signals (like the few european eclipses had).
Other than that, ya, altezzas are lame.
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|