Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Mitsubishi > Eclipse/Talon/Laser > Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain Discuss Engine, Transmission, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-22-2006, 08:51 PM   #1
4G63t Power
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Altoona, Pennsylvania
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

Ok... Its time to upgrade and I have a problem... Which turbo should I get... I can get a brand new Bulleseye Power 50 trim or 57 trim. The thing is I can get the 57 trim for 100 bucks cheaper brand new. Im still on an AFC and plan to run 680cc injectors. Ive heard so many good things about the 50 trim. I have heard good and bad things about the 57 trim. What is spool difference between the two? Also in slowboys dyno test on tuners the 50 trim made more power. Can someone with experience with these turbos point me in the right direction. Which one is better for a street/strip daily driver. My hp goals are upper 300's pump and 400ish on race gas. Which would you guys go with taking into accout the 57 trim is cheaper and im still on the SAFC. Thanks... Ryan
__________________
AWD sold
New car*
90' Eclipse Gs-T
Shaved head with rebuilt motor
Slowboy racing limited slip
compression 165 across the board (:
Fully ported Big 16g with 34mm flapper
Precision racing Fmic
Slowboy Boost controler set at 15lbs
Custom 3 inch turboback
Fully ported o2 housing
Ported 2g manifold
Slowboy racing UICP
3 inch hard intake pipe
SAFC
Autometer carbon fiber gauges
Putting down a solid 300whp
1/4=13.7 at 109
That mph is good for high 12's with traction (:
4G63t Power is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 09:23 PM   #2
Thor06
Jizzed In My Pants
 
Thor06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 6,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

Well, I wouldnt even go that big unless you are running DSM link. I've never heard anything bad about either the 50 or 57 trim, I would go with the cheaper one. How much are they?
__________________



Build on hold until I get a good paying job, either in school or once I get out. At that time a full tear down and complete rebuild should be in order.

The Purple People Eater will ride again... January 2011 can't come soon enough.
Thor06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 10:44 PM   #3
crunchymilk55
AF Enthusiast
 
crunchymilk55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,010
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to crunchymilk55
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

First off, you can't run an AFC and 680's and expect a decent tune. It will suck at idleing AND at boost.

Second, 50 trim and 57 trim turbos isn't really a turbo. It's a ratio of the specs on the turbo. Which ones are you talking about?
__________________
now - 2000 civic
soon - 2002 is300
crunchymilk55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 11:21 PM   #4
scottsee
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: spokane, Washington
Posts: 3,677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to scottsee
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

PTE-BB-SCM 50trim!!
__________________
DSM geek
scottsee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 11:57 PM   #5
blk_srt
AF Fanatic
 
blk_srt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, Minnesota
Posts: 4,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to blk_srt Send a message via MSN to blk_srt
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

I've seen plenty of people running 680s on an afc with no problems. Hell I've seen people running 750s
__________________

2004 Flame Red SRT-4
|Audiobahn 1200Q|Rockford 602s|Jensen flip out dvd|
Mods:
blk_srt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 12:18 AM   #6
Blackcrow64
AF Moderator
 
Blackcrow64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, Ohio
Posts: 9,620
Thanks: 52
Thanked 24 Times in 23 Posts
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

The 57 trim is gonna lag worse than the 50 trim will on the street. If your goal is 300-400hp then I'd go with the 50 trim so that you have more bottom end power. Really, a 57 trim will only be good all around on a built motor. I've seen it and if I had the money to spend on a 57 trim and a built motor I would go that route. But, I don't, so therefore I would go with a 50 trim and use the afc and a gm maft for tuning it.
__________________
-Brian
  • 92 Firebird sold
  • 97 Talon TSI AWD sold
  • 05 Cobalt LS sold
  • 02 Tahoe LT sold
  • 06 Cadillac STS4 AWD sold
  • 03 Corvette Z06
  • 14 Silverado 1500
Blackcrow64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 05:37 PM   #7
4G63t Power
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Altoona, Pennsylvania
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

Thanks Blackcrow64 for giving me a straight answer. I am really get sick of this forum because nobody will give you a straight answer. I didnt post "can I run 680's with an afc" I personally have seen it done in two different cars. Sure, its not nearly as good as Dsm Link but I dont have 500 dollars for it right now. I wanted reviews on the turbos. If you dont know anything about them... Dont Post! Anyhow... any more input guys? Is the lag really noticable between the two turbos?
__________________
AWD sold
New car*
90' Eclipse Gs-T
Shaved head with rebuilt motor
Slowboy racing limited slip
compression 165 across the board (:
Fully ported Big 16g with 34mm flapper
Precision racing Fmic
Slowboy Boost controler set at 15lbs
Custom 3 inch turboback
Fully ported o2 housing
Ported 2g manifold
Slowboy racing UICP
3 inch hard intake pipe
SAFC
Autometer carbon fiber gauges
Putting down a solid 300whp
1/4=13.7 at 109
That mph is good for high 12's with traction (:
4G63t Power is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 05:39 PM   #8
blk_srt
AF Fanatic
 
blk_srt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, Minnesota
Posts: 4,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to blk_srt Send a message via MSN to blk_srt
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

I wouldnt think lag would be more than 500 rpm between the two, really if you can I would go with the 57 trim that way you have room to work with
__________________

2004 Flame Red SRT-4
|Audiobahn 1200Q|Rockford 602s|Jensen flip out dvd|
Mods:
blk_srt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 09:01 PM   #9
kjewer1
AF - Advisor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

The problem is the 57 trim isn't much bigger than a 50 trim, and it doesn't seem to do quite as well. Actually, it looks like it flows a couple pounds less than the 50 trim. Same for the 54. The 60 trim does like 52 lbs/min or something. It's easy to see why the 50 trim is so popular in light of this...

I like to follow Forced Performance's lead in this. They offered the Green (50 trim) and Red (60-1) and didn't bother with any of the wheels in between (54, 57, and 60 trim). I would agree with them on this one.

680s will work with an AFC, but there isnt much room for tuning. The injector compensation will be ~33%, minus another 10-14% to get somewhere near 10.5-11:1, leaving only another 3-7% of range on the AFC. This becomes a serious problem on race gas when you tend to lean out another 10% But it will "work."
__________________
Kevin Jewer
RWD Talon - 7.92 at 180
Mightymax - 10.7 at 125
kjewer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2006, 11:08 PM   #10
4G63t Power
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Altoona, Pennsylvania
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

Kevin your the man... I thought the 50 trim was better but everyone says the 57 trim flows more... but from what ive seen the 50 is doing better. I have fallen into some extra funds and may dsm and link it after all... where can I get the best price on dsm link?
__________________
AWD sold
New car*
90' Eclipse Gs-T
Shaved head with rebuilt motor
Slowboy racing limited slip
compression 165 across the board (:
Fully ported Big 16g with 34mm flapper
Precision racing Fmic
Slowboy Boost controler set at 15lbs
Custom 3 inch turboback
Fully ported o2 housing
Ported 2g manifold
Slowboy racing UICP
3 inch hard intake pipe
SAFC
Autometer carbon fiber gauges
Putting down a solid 300whp
1/4=13.7 at 109
That mph is good for high 12's with traction (:
4G63t Power is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2006, 11:18 PM   #11
blk_srt
AF Fanatic
 
blk_srt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, Minnesota
Posts: 4,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to blk_srt Send a message via MSN to blk_srt
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

__________________

2004 Flame Red SRT-4
|Audiobahn 1200Q|Rockford 602s|Jensen flip out dvd|
Mods:
blk_srt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 09:02 AM   #12
TheRomer
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atkinson, New Hampshire
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: BEP 50 trim vs 57 trim

i was going this same route so i can tell you my experience. I was going with the 50 trim, because it was a good size turbo at low cost (i was looking at the SBR 50 trim). But then a guy told me to get the SBR 57 trim because it was better. Well i went to call in my order, and i still was a little iffy on the turbo i wanted, i couldnt really decide. I talked to this guy named marc at SBR when placing my order. He had a 2g gsx that ran 11's, so he knew his stuff. I told him i was probably gonna go with the 57 trim, and when i did he said "may i ask why you are heading towards the 57 trim... from experience the 57 trim is not as good as the 50 trim, it lags more and gives you the same power as the 50 trim" or words to that affect. He told me people complained about the 57 trims lag. He told me that on race gas the 50 trim could get a little over 400 whp, and on pump around 350 or something like that (dont exactly remember). Anyways, i didnt get either but thats my problem. The 50 trim would be much better in your case because you get basically the same power, but without the lag. i hope this helps.
__________________
Chris Winchell
95 GSX 12.5 ET with a 1.9 60' at 115 mph
Actually have traction this year
90 TSI <Project Acer>
2.0L, 2400 lbs AWD, t-67 goodness
TheRomer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Mitsubishi > Eclipse/Talon/Laser > Engine, Transmission and Drivetrain


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts