-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > Silverado
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-18-2006, 12:13 AM
SWDoodle SWDoodle is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
245 vs 265

I'm thinking about upgrading the stock 245's to 265's on my 2500HD 6.0/4.1. Will this be enough of an increase to see any power loss? I don't want that. When I went from 265 to 285's on my 1500 I noticed some power loss and a drop in mileage. Alson, how much will the 265's drop the rpm's? Could there possibly be some gains in mileage?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2006, 01:53 AM
Legasus233 Legasus233 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

If you go from a 245 to a 265, I guarantee you will see a loss in both virtual mileage and actual mileage per gallon. First, if your truck had stock 265's with 245's added later, you mileage would seem a lot better, because your truck thinks it is going more miles than it actually is. However, if you are used to driving on 245's, and switch to 265's, your mileage will automatically decrease if you were never taking into consideration the smaller diameter tires. Also, it takes more torque to get a 265 going versus a 245, due to the smaller diameter. All things to keep in mind.
__________________


2000 Sierra SLT Z71 Chrome handles, wheel wells, bedrails, nerf bars, Genesis Roll-up cover, Sirius satellite, Cranked torsion bars, Toyo Open Country A/T's LT265/75/16
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2006, 07:15 AM
OGG OGG is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

I did this upgrade on my 2500 and there didn't seem to be a significant power loss with the 3.73 or any difference in mileage. With the 4.10 you won't notice anything. The larger diameter and heavier mass pretty much cancel each other out. With the heavier axles and transmission of the 2500 the relative difference is much less than in a 1500. My boss has the same truck you do with 315/70's on it and it moves just fine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2006, 09:15 AM
TexasF355F1's Avatar
TexasF355F1 TexasF355F1 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TexasF355F1
Re: 245 vs 265

245 to 265 will should be none. You will not lose mileage b/c this is tire width, not height. if you change from say a 70 series tire to a taller size you will have to change your speedo.
__________________
*Under Construction - New sig to debut*
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2006, 11:54 AM
SWDoodle SWDoodle is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

I'm pretty sure that the 265/75 is not only wider, but taller as well compared to the 245/75. I tend to agree with the earlier post that with a 4.10 rearend I wouldn't think that a little increase in tire size would effect the power much. Geez, this thing runs 2400 rpm's at 70 in OD! My 1500 with used to run at around 2100. There's nothing wrong with the stock tires, they just look so puny on a heavy CC pick-up.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2006, 12:40 PM
tykrz's Avatar
tykrz tykrz is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 211
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

I'm running 265's on 17inch wheels with 4.10 gears. My tach's running at 2200rpm at 70 mph. Lots of power and good mpg with a 5.3L auto 4x4.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2006, 05:16 PM
pnewcomb1 pnewcomb1 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 245 vs 265

I have 265's in place of my original 245's on both my Silverado and Suburban. Both of them are 2000 4 wheel drives with the torsion bars cranked to level. In both cases there is not any appreciable difference, other than the fact that the trucks look much better in my opinion. I might even try 285's next time around. Hey, in the snow, tall and narrow is the best way I know to keep the shovel in the butt end of the truck vs. in my hand!
__________________
...any tool dropped will roll to the exact geographic center of the vehicle.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-19-2006, 10:47 AM
Legasus233 Legasus233 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasF355F1
245 to 265 will should be none. You will not lose mileage b/c this is tire width, not height. if you change from say a 70 series tire to a taller size you will have to change your speedo.

You are wrong. 265's are taller than 245's, depending on tread depth, by as much as two inches taller. Therefore, if a truck like mine came original with 265's and had 245's put on it, the speedo would be off. When I bought my truck used, it came with 245's on it. I knew the weren't stock because inside my door it said OEM was 265. My speedometer was off like 4-5 MPH and I noticed a difference of about 9-10% in miles. With 245's, if my odometer said I traveled 320 miles in a trip, I actually only traveled 300 or so. So, to figure out my actual gas mileage, I multiplied total miles by .09 and figured it out that way.
__________________


2000 Sierra SLT Z71 Chrome handles, wheel wells, bedrails, nerf bars, Genesis Roll-up cover, Sirius satellite, Cranked torsion bars, Toyo Open Country A/T's LT265/75/16
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-20-2006, 02:37 AM
grego10r grego10r is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

i did loss power when i got 265
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-20-2006, 03:52 PM
dr_of_lovephd dr_of_lovephd is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

The 265s are not so much bigger that the size or weight will cause a loss of power. But since the tires are taller so it will have the effect of lowering you gear ratio slightly. This will give better gas mileage,but you can not accelerate as quickly, so it feels like the truck has less power.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-20-2006, 04:55 PM
twomorestrokes's Avatar
twomorestrokes twomorestrokes is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 245 vs 265

When I bought my HD used, the dealer already upgraded it to 265's. They looked better, but I traded them in for 285 Yokohama's. Looks much better now, and still tows great with the 4.10's. (about 3.80:1 effective ratio with the large tire) The milage is about the same (14 mpg) after figuring the odometer difference. I can still tow an open car hauler 70 mph in o/d (tow/haul mode) at just 2000-2100 rpm and the trans temp stays low.

Anything less than 4.10's I'd recommend a gear change when going up 2 sizes. I did the same tire swap on my last truck with 3.42's and it sucked. No more towing ANYTHING on o/d, and the milage went down the drain.
__________________
'02 2500HD 6.0/4.10 Air Lift bags, 175 psi onboard air
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > Silverado


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts