|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cavalier Reliability
I'm looking for a car. I've been all over eBay and it seems that Cavaliers go for way less than Civics, atleast thats what it seems.
I'm wondering is their any reliability issues with cavaliers, I'm looking at stuff in the 60K range. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
Quote:
Cavaliers are generally pretty reliable. I've had no real problems with my 03, but it only has 20k on it as of now. If you get the Z24 with the 2.4 in it I've heard it's particularly strong, and reliable. Even at 60k you'd have a pretty good running car I think seeings as some people have Cavaliers with 200k+. If I were you I'd either get the previously mentioned Z24 or the newest body style with the 2.2 ecotec, not to say the other 2.2 is bad or anything. Just an opinion, and yeah, the Cavalier does go for less than the Civic. Good luck with picking a car. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
my 2000 cavalier has 182,000 miles and still kicking strong
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
it really seems like the later years ones run for longer than the older ones, with most of the engines anyways
but it also seems that alot less of the later years ones sold than the early ones ironic possibly it seems that with the older ones the Z24 are the best ones to have, along with any of the 2.4L ones, and the later ones all seem to drive/ride lots better than the 94 older ones, the 95-up actually seem very improved and thats coming from an old beater truck and big car freak like me that doesnt evne like little FWD cars very much at all, good luck
__________________
I also am user fastr68 here- Randy -'54 F100 302 C-6 -'57 F100 -'57 Bel Air HT 307 4spd '57 210 HT 4dr 265 3spd -'68 corvair monza convertible w/ PG -'79 C-20 -'80 K-20 -'82 K-10 SS -'82 TRANS AM WS7 HT 5.0L TH350 2400 stall blue/blue level III PMD cloth PG hood -'85 Elky SS 310ci 2004r fully restored 2008 -'88 buick century estate wagon 3800 4t40e, 91 s-10 2wd 4.3L, 96 taurus, '97 cavalier RS 2.2L, 5sd -'05 18ft car trailer, 98 achieva, 98 cherokee, |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
ive had 2 cavaliers...(1 got totaled at 140k and it was runnin like brand new) and 1 now wit about 80k on it and it runs realllly well (just replaces the clutch)
__________________
ThE neW wHiP:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
Take care of it and it will last forever
__________________
MAKE ART, NOT WAR |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
I've owned 3 over the past 20 years and they all have been very reliable cars. Honda is over rated and the Cavaliers can be had pretty cheap used or at the local auction. I bought a 1992 at the auction last year for a relative and it has been flawless. Just keep up with the maintenance.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
They have some common problem areas,and I find the materials used in the 95-up cars is far cheaper than the 2nd generation models.Sitting in a 3rd gen Cavalier as compared to a 94 is like night and day.The plastics seem more flimsy,the dash is almost nonexistant on the passenger side,and the trim on the doors and overall body shape and feel of the sheetmetal seems inferior to the 1988-1994 series.I do however like the seating feel and legroom on the 95-ups as compared to 94 back.I particularly think the rear door design on the 95-ups is rather laughable.No dog leg is used on the rear wheel well.The door is the dog leg,fully exposing the door skin to the splash of the rear tire.This is obvious cost cutting on GMs part.Why GM would have to cheapen a top seller like the Cavalier for its 95 redesign is beyond me.Probably speaks volumes of why GM is in such deep trouble today.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
I will admit and so will a select few gm tech guys to someones face that there is a nice list of things on the cavs that stock just suck a fat one but as soon as those things take a dump and you replace them with aftermarket/better things the car is great.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
I have had 2 cavi's so far a 94 with a v6 5 speed, and my 03 5 speed now... and itruely cannot complain about either.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
Ive got a 98 coupe with 80k miles. Bought it from a rental company. I havent had any problems with it. Still running strong.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
Quote:
__________________
2001 Grand Prix GT: cat/u-bend/resonator delete, zzp PLOG, Custom Intake, DHP PCM, 1981 Fairmont 6cyl 3 speed 1978 Ford Ranchero GT 302 with a few goodies |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
my 03 cavalier has 55,600 miles on it(i know its alot) the only thing ive replaced was the fuel pump(was a lil pricey) and the starter. Ive seen cavaliers on ebay with 180,000 still running strong
screw civics
__________________
------------------------------------------------- Honda what? Current Ride: 03' Cavalier Coupe Sport Package Silver Just got it lowered looks so good!!! Dream Car: 2005 Porsche 911 GT3 Silver |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
Quote:
__________________
Check out my ride at http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2228028
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cavalier Reliability
I am also looking into buying a Cavalier, but I am concerned. I have heard a lot of them have starting problems, at some time or another in the life of the car. And it is not just a simple repair like a starter. Is this true? If so what causes it?
Thanks in advance for the info! |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|