dodge stealth??

[Vladimer]

what do u guys think of the Dodge Stealth, in like racing terms, i only seen them like 4 times here in my city and never ehard anything about it, is it good with the hp or more of a crappy car??

[dbartoschek]

Dodge Stealth's are the shit! Not sure on any specs, but they definitely have power, and they look good at the same time. Pretty expensive still in my opinion, but that's because they are nice sports cars. You could beat alot of people in a Stealth!:aug2:

[StageOneGalant]

Originally posted by dbartoschek
Dodge Stealth's are the shit! Not sure on any specs, but they definitely have power, and they look good at the same time. Pretty expensive still in my opinion, but that's because they are nice sports cars. You could beat alot of people in a Stealth!:aug2:

but the 3000gt vr-4 is quicker.... the stealth has some power,,, it can really move..

[CAptynCrunch]

Wait, aren't the vr4 and the R/T basically identical?

But yes, a stealth is an absolutley fabulous sports car. Big engine, turbo charged, AWD.

They're dfinitily one of the best on the road.

[Polygon]

Originally posted by CAptynCrunch
Wait, aren't the vr4 and the R/T basically identical?

But yes, a stealth is an absolutley fabulous sports car. Big engine, turbo charged, AWD.

They're dfinitily one of the best on the road.

They are EXACTLY the same, the only differences are cosmetic.

[Vladimer]

any1 know the specs by any chance??

[Vladimer]

oh ya, and ho is it with getting some mods for it?? r they hard to find or r there a bunch and how would it stand up to some competion on the streets??, thanx

[TerminalVelocity]

you wouldnt really need them, but yes, you could find them

[Vladimer]

k... so its pretty competitive stock??

[94svt5.0]

Originally posted by Vladimer
any1 know the specs by any chance??

0-60 in the 6sec range and the 1/4 around 14.2-14.5 sec.
I think they make about 320 hp. Now this is the r/t turbo version. A civic could beat the non turbo verson. Underpowered, overweight.

[TatII]

yes the standard stealths and the 3000GT's are crap. they're front wheel drive and are waaaay over weight and waaaaaaay under powered. but i don't like how the stealth looks from behind. it just looks too cheap and it also looks really raised because theres no front spoiler either. it looks sort of like a 4X4 sports car IMO

[dbartoschek]

yea the top models have 300-320 bhp
0-100km/h - 5.7 sec
top speed 245 km/h

[1320B4U]

The 91-94 VR4 and R/T Turbo have 300bhp@6000rpm and 307ft lbs@2500rpm (kinda V-8 like) and run to 60 in about 5.2-5.5 and cover the 1/4 in 13.8-14.3, top speed is 150-156mph. They have a 3.0 DOHC 24 valve V6, twin turbo, twin intercooler, AWD w/limeted slip diff, and a 5spd trans. The VR4 adds Active Aero(front lip and back lower and raise when the hit 75 MPH, I raced one on the freeway, it was pretty tight), AWS all wheel steering, and cockpit adjustable exhaust.

The 95's+ has 320bhp@6k and 315ft lbs@2500, simply because it has a different boost solenoid(like 1.5-2psi more). Add a 6 speed manual and a new body, there a little quicker, and thats what you get.

All trannys are from the German company Getrag.

If I were going to buy a older used model, I would go with the Stealth, just because it doesn't have the extras that will break down.

[fatninja19]

doesnt bhp mean brake horse power? so doesnt that mean hp at the wheels?

[94svt5.0]

Originally posted by fatninja19
doesnt bhp mean brake horse power? so doesnt that mean hp at the wheels?

Rear wheel HP will be between 12-18% lower then bhp. Depends on what type car and transmission. bhp does stand for brake hp but, not the brakes that stop the car. It is measured I believe at the flywheel.