![]() |
![]() |
Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Performance Discuss Engine, Suspension, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here. |
View Poll Results: Which engine would you choose to be the next engine in the Mustang | |||
Supercarged 4.0 from Jaguar |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 33.33% |
Tweaked 4.6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 22.22% |
All New 4.6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
5.4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 22.22% |
Other, Explain |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 22.22% |
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 360
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Which Engie would you prefer?
For the next engine to power the mustang what would you choose?
I personally like the 4L from the jag, it's light small displacement and with the supercharger as a awesome power band, with some tweaking a bit more aggressive cam, and exhaust system and a few more revs and it would easily pump out 450 hp
__________________
What Is With The Hatred Between Imports and Domestics? In The End, We All Love Cars. Last edited by mr_tw; 12-07-2005 at 06:32 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
I would like to see the engine that was in development code named "Hurricane". But realistically I think we are going to be stuck with the 4.6 and its problems for a while. Something light weight (AL block) and still able to make over 400hp with out a power adder would be nice.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
AF Newbie
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 60
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
like said above. the jag. its a little smaller, but can be milked easily.
__________________
"All good things are wild and free" -Henry David Thoreau |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
i think the 5.4 would be nice to have, as shown with the cobra R it is easily capable of reaching levels of power that are competitive with the gm and dodge v8s. and since then the engine has been even further developed.
i voted for the 5.4, but to be honest i think something that may be a good marketing scheme would be the number 5.0. Im not necessarily saying go back to pushrod motors, but maybe work on a developing an engine of that displacement that can generate good power and be reliable as i know the cammer motor is not the most reliable of engines. plus its to damn expensive. whats this hurricane engine your talking about? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
Code-named Hurricane was a 6.2-liter V8 to be Ford's response to the 5.7-liter Hemi.
Now the GR-1's V10 would be great but it has also been shelved. The 6.4-liter V-10 engine produced 605 horsepower was lighter than the 550hp supercharged 5.4 in Ford GT.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
I am not a big fan of the displacement dropping lower than 4.6, anything bigger is a bonus to me.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
Quote:
The misconception about Ford going to a Heaton because they were unable to produce the power numbers they wanted to see out of the 4.6 with out one is totally untrue. Had Ford taken the time to correctly build up the 4.6 (with parts they have had for years none the less) then it would have easily been able to reach the 400bhp mark and been lighter. I know of at least one person who has surpassed the 400rwhp mark out of a 01 Cobra with just bolt ons including the FR500 heads, cams, and intake.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
I am aware that power can certainly be made without monster displacement. Its just one of those things that I like to hear. If there were two cars that were both equiped with a 350 hp motor, one being a 4 liter and another being a 5 liter, I would go with the 5 liter car. (I understand that displacement will in some cases cause the physical dimentions to limit the options of the frame and suspension, such as in the case of the 05 Mustang)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
a tweaked 5.4 would be awsome
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
Quote:
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
Quote:
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Re: Re: Which Engie would you prefer?
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|