stang vs LS1

[1FASTws6]

my cousins 95 gt auto with a cat back, intake and some other minor stuff challenged his friends 98 LS1 TRANS AM. 6 spd with exhaust, intake, filter, power programer. If they were to race hands down the ls1 would win. but my cousin just wont back down. He still wants to race and race. PLZ tell him ur opinion so i could show this thread to him.

[BigDanTheMan]

tell your cuz' friend to get some wood screws and back up your family.

[zx2srdotnet]

i know bolt-on ESCORTS that beat auto 95 GT's.

your Bro will be slaughtered repeatedly

[SVTcobra306]

Ask GTStang about the mighty LS1, maybe he could bring his sig kill count back.....

"The LS1 can not be beaten"

[01L2Cobra]

Yea the Firechiken would win hands down in that case

[Joshta]

Originally Posted by SVTcobra306

Ask GTStang about the mighty LS1, maybe he could bring his sig kill count back.....

"The LS1 can not be beaten"

Yes please, I would like to see it again.

[SkylineUSA]

LS1 would kill that Stang!

[BigDanTheMan]

for the record i'm just saying support your family memebers even in the worst of times. and i mean come on - the ls1 has a filter for pete's sake; game over for all of us!

[TheStang00]

i once saw an ls1 go 15 rounds with godzilla at madison square garden...

[eillob]

94-95 Mustang GT's are really underpowered to start with. Ford really did this car bad. I mean were talking about a 3,700lb car with 215hp. The power to weight ratio just isn't there, especially if its an auto. Thats kind of why you always hear the ricers bragging about how they beat up on them.

You can beat an LS1 with it, but its gonna take a LOT more than those few bolt on's to do it.

[Iron]

Originally Posted by eillob

94-95 Mustang GT's are really underpowered to start with. Ford really did this car bad. I mean were talking about a 3,700lb car with 215hp. The power to weight ratio just isn't there, especially if its an auto. Thats kind of why you always hear the ricers bragging about how they beat up on them.

You can beat an LS1 with it, but its gonna take a LOT more than those few bolt on's to do it.

The ricer way is to lose to a domestic type 15 times then beat a slower version(say a v6 f body/stang or somethin) and brag about how American cars suck, it's quite annoying.

[zx2srdotnet]

Originally Posted by Iron

The ricer way is to lose to a domestic type 15 times then beat a slower version(say a v6 f body/stang or somethin) and brag about how American cars suck, it's quite annoying.

they do, lol other companies have 14sec family cars that make the v6 stang/fbody look like utter crap lol

in 1989 Ford had a SHO that when driven right ran high 14's was a 3l v6 220hp 220tq....made by Yamaha

i have yet to see any v6 built by ford that was 3.0l and running 14's (or any stock v6 for that fact) hel i hve yet to see anything smaller then a 4.0l break 15.3 stock(05 Stang)

[TheStang00]

Originally Posted by zx2srdotnet

they do, lol other companies have 14sec family cars that make the v6 stang/fbody look like utter crap lol

in 1989 Ford had a SHO that when driven right ran high 14's was a 3l v6 220hp 220tq....made by Yamaha

i have yet to see any v6 built by ford that was 3.0l and running 14's (or any stock v6 for that fact) hel i hve yet to see anything smaller then a 4.0l break 15.3 stock(05 Stang)

well the 15.3 is with an auto tranny to, i think it would be possible for a manual to hit 14.9. but if you read the other post about the 3.5l comin out, that should please you.

[zx2srdotnet]

no i saw a few v6's at the track. I was running 15.6 and new v6 stangs were doing 15.3-15.5 all day, and they were 5 speeds.

[neatofrito1618]

99-04 v6 stangs cant hit 14's stock. iv seen some hit 14's with bolt ons though