-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical
Register FAQ Community
Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-05-2005, 03:21 AM
infantfinite86 infantfinite86 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
C6 or FMX?

I have a '72 Ford Ranchero, and I don't know what tranny I have.
It's the a 3 speed on the column, but how do I tell if it's a C6 or a FMX?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2005, 01:32 PM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

FMX has an iron case, aluminum bellhousing and tailhousing. C-6 is an all-aluminum case with an integral bellhousing. If your 351C was a 2-bbl. stock, it's an FMX. 4-bbl. engines got the "baby" C-6.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-26-2005, 09:02 PM
cowood cowood is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
don't be misled

although its true all fmx's do have iron cases.not all c-6's have integral bell housing , only those for f.e. . there are a few c-4's that came behind clevelands w/removable bell ,easy tell-tell this c-4 dipstick tube is threaded.this tranny will bolt up to a 460,& w/ some beefing up is just as tough and a whole lot smoother than a c-6 and has less horsepower loss. i have seen this c-4 hold up to 1000h.p . for years on end without fail.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2005, 08:43 AM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

Cowood,
I've never seen a C-6 that wasn't an "integral bellhousing". Please advise, what car/truck did they come in, and behind what engine?

I've also never seen a C-4 behind anything bigger than a 302. All the Cleveland Mach 1s were FMX with the 2-bbl. and the "baby" C-6 behind 4-bbl. engines.
The bellhousing that fits a smallblock will not fit the Lima OR FE blocks, nor the "M" blocks.

I'm real curious your information source. Built LOTS of Fords over the years. Never see any of the combos you talk about.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2005, 09:56 PM
cowood cowood is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the c-4's i'm referring to, personaly i have only seen in lincolns or ltd's and big bodied merc.s of the early 70's behind 351 m.
as for the c-6 i have a 75 f-150 460 in my yard w/ detatchable bell housing. granted it was special ordered w/ towing package and shifts alittle harder than most but it's still just a c-6. as far as i know the tow pkg. was just a heavy duty bumper & h.d.rear springs and 4-barrel carb.
i am also curious about what you are calling the baby c-6, what are its characteristics?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2005, 05:14 PM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

The ones you have behind the M engines are FMX, I'm quite sure... (nothing is EVER "in stone" when it comes to what came with what, so don't quote me...) A good friend/customer has two '79 F-150s . One is a 351M and the other is a 400. The 400 has the extended cab and long bed, no tow pack, C-6, no doubt. The other has the tow pack, standard cab, long bed. Also a C-6, no doubt.

Funny, but just a couple of days ago, I caught a blurb from an otherwise very knowledgeable guy (on another site) stating the M engines are junk with a capital "J". I couldn't disagree more! He was refering to all the head cracking and overheating problems they had when "young". Lance's (my friend referenced above) trucks will pull a house down, and get decent fuel economy for their size/weight (about 14 MPG with a load). No heating, no oil burning, no nuthin' but good... We built both engines here. One has over 90K on it since the rebuild. I suspect, their emmission controls and tuning to make the things run with the old technology, was the main reason for the massive problems. With today's technology and techniques, along with modern cam profiles and cooling systems, they are GREAT engines.
Sorry, didn't mean to get off on a tangent here, just found it interesting...

The "baby C-6" was the nickname for the small block version that came behind 351C 4-bbl. engines. That was the only application until it re-appeared in the late '70s in vans and pickups behind 302s and 351Ws with heavy duty packages. At one time, it was "prized". Anymore, it isn't very hard to come by.

I have a very close friend that's a transmission man from the "old" days. I'll talk to him and see what might be there. You got my curiosity up now!

Happy New Year!!!

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2006, 11:19 PM
cowood cowood is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up

ya know were starting to clutter this guys thread but im telling you these c-4's do exist absolutely,positively . i have beento the junk yard myself and pulled them . its a racer dream . my buddy who is a master machinist / racer figured out this trick .you take a c-4 any c-4 for that matter has 4 clutches inside c-6's have 6 clutches inside hence the name.machine out the housing to make room for another clutch effectively turning a c-4 into a bulletproof c-5,with a few other minor modifications that im not at liberty to disclose.overall weight and reciprocating weight of the trans. is significantly dropped= faster e.t.

351 m has same bell housing as 460,429,it is definitely a c-4 with a threaded dipstick tube. the bell housing is the real gold of the package . because it allows you to put a lighter trans. behind a big block
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2006, 09:59 AM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

Thanks. If you had a pic or two, I would appreciate it.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-21-2006, 11:10 PM
stuarta stuarta is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

C6 transmissions did not have a detacheable bell housing.

C4 and the MX series are the only ones.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-22-2006, 09:22 PM
zx2guy zx2guy is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 701
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

just curious about this... and not to detract from infantfinite86's but i thought that this could help me too. i have a 73 mercury cougar... 2v 351 C... and i was wondering too what my tranny is... i do have the code off of the door. its an X... and if anyone knows too... my rear diff code is a 2... and if anyone knows if thats the ford 9" i would appreciate help

and one side note which tranny is the strongest... or can be built stronger... i plan to make a screamer out of my car and i dont want to break anything.
__________________
ford guy.... i know, and im sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-22-2006, 10:45 PM
stuarta stuarta is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowood
ya know were starting to clutter this guys thread but im telling you these c-4's do exist absolutely,positively . i have beento the junk yard myself and pulled them . its a racer dream . my buddy who is a master machinist / racer figured out this trick .you take a c-4 any c-4 for that matter has 4 clutches inside c-6's have 6 clutches inside hence the name.machine out the housing to make room for another clutch effectively turning a c-4 into a bulletproof c-5,with a few other minor modifications that im not at liberty to disclose.overall weight and reciprocating weight of the trans. is significantly dropped= faster e.t.

351 m has same bell housing as 460,429,it is definitely a c-4 with a threaded dipstick tube. the bell housing is the real gold of the package . because it allows you to put a lighter trans. behind a big block
http://www.bulkpart.com/Merchant2/me...gory_Code=Ford

Yes a C4 has a removeable bell housing.
But there is no way possible of turning a C4 into a C6 or any other C.
I don't care if your name is Merlin.
If you are adding more clutches you are merely beefing the transmission up.
That part ain't rocket science.

A c4 and a C6 are two different transmissions.
In fact you could put an complete c4 inside a C6.
Yes you can bolt C4 to a very large engine.
back to the drawing board my friend.

Last edited by stuarta; 01-23-2006 at 12:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-25-2006, 04:30 AM
infantfinite86 infantfinite86 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

Wow, this turned into nice thread.
I took a look over my Door Data Plate (I feel like an idiot for not doing that in the first place), and my transmission code is "W". Dearborn Classics has a nice breakdown of the Data Codes, but naturally, it didn't tell what a "W" was for 1972. "W" was a C4 in previous years, and there wasn't a single entry for a FMX ever using a "W", but instead using an "X" from 70-72, so I decided to throw in that tidbit to you guys too. Can anyone name a site that I could go to that has a more extensive guide to the Door Data and what each code signifies?
Oh, and while I'm on the subject of trannsmissions, can anyone tell me if the 351W and 351C have the same trannsmission bolt pattern? Or if they can tell me where I can find out? The reason I ask is that I can't find a company that makes a kit to mount a T-56 tranny to a 351C, but they do have them for the 351W...And I'm VERY much hoping that it will work, otherwise I'll have to find a machine shop that can modify the bellhousing for me.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-25-2006, 08:17 AM
stuarta stuarta is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

Can you post the entire serial number?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-25-2006, 01:30 PM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

Yes, Cleveland and Windsor share the bellhousing bolt pattern, along with 289 (late) and 302 (and 240/300-6 of all things...).

Look at the case. If it's iron , with aluminum bell and tail, FMX, no doubt. If it's all aluminum, and has an integral bellhousing (not detatchable), C-6. All aluminum, and bellhousing can be removed, if the bolts holding it on go through the pump housing, C-4. If the bolts do NOT go through the pump housing, C-5.

FWIW, EVERY 351C 2-bbl. I've ever seen with an automatic, was FMX. Every 351C 4-bbl. was C-6. Those are cars I HAVE SEEN. I won't dispute oddballs. I've seen some pretty strange stuff over the years, so very little surprises me anymore...

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-26-2006, 03:53 AM
infantfinite86 infantfinite86 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: C6 or FMX?

VIN: 2A47H319678

Body: 97D
Color: 4C
Trim: UAA
Trans: W
Axle: 6
DSO: 71

I found a site that had the trans code for 72, mine's a C4, which is cool, because I want to throw a Hurst Quarter stick on it, but I only found them for C4's and C6's. At least I finally know what I have.

And MrPbody, you are now officially my hero. I'm so ecstatic about that information that I could do a lil jig right now, but I'm at work, so I'll refrain.

Thank you VERY much, all of you guys. I'm gonna have to come back to you guys for more advice and questions when they come up.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts