-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-03-2005, 08:31 PM
PowerCrazy PowerCrazy is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question which control arms better

is there an actual difference in performance/functionality of boxed vs. tubular rear control arms?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2005, 09:19 PM
88camaroproject's Avatar
88camaroproject 88camaroproject is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,302
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 88camaroproject
Re: which control arms better

i would think boxed is better, but im gonna go with tubular on this. but triangular ones would be best, they would be soooo strong. i think. but i dont beleive triangular ones are made. go for tubular
__________________

87 firebird formula ws6
(currently has a old 78 305 with the following upgrades,
including lots of miles and stock heads and internals....oops)
crane cam cam specs
performance valve springs and retainers, flowtech headers, 255 lph fuel pump,
holley 600cfm carb, weiand single plane manifold, a healty diet.
14.90 1/4 mile....just wait for the 406 to be finished
MY VIDEOS
MY PICTURES
-Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2005, 09:44 PM
flatlander757 flatlander757 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flatlander757
tubular = lighter and stronger than stock

boxed = slightly heavier than tubular(not sur ehow it compares to stock as far as weight goes though) and way stronger than both tubular and stock

I would think triangular would cost too much because of the complexity of the mounting points and whatnot.
__________________
-Tony- Sold my Z28 looong ago. Now sporting an '03 TJ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:14 AM
Savage Messiah's Avatar
Savage Messiah Savage Messiah is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,690
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Savage Messiah Send a message via Yahoo to Savage Messiah
Re: which control arms better

if you are going tcheap than boxing your stockers are ideal. Buying aftermarket, I would go with boxed nly if your only concern is straight lines... some say tubular is stonger than boxed (circle stronger than square) and tubulars are lighter. Also I personally would get poly bushings
__________________
97 Camaro - 2.077 60', 14.745 @ 92.20 - still down, one year later.

194k miles-160* thermo-V8 shocks/springs (V6 rear springs)-3" Magnaflow !cat (3" dynomax bullet) back-SLP CAI-stock boxed LCAs-poly tranny mount and torque arm bushing-custom HPTuners tuning-4.10s/eaton/TA girdle-3.5" alum DS-spohn LCA brackets-prostar skinnies

179.75 RWHP, 204.52 RWTQ

ON ITS WAY: MORE

R.I.P. Andy

87 Benz 190e - DD

01 EX250 - still gotta get my license for this thing
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2005, 04:02 AM
Morley Morley is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,983
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: which control arms better

Quote:
Originally Posted by 97CamaroRS
i Buying aftermarket, I would go with boxed nly if your only concern is straight lines...
Why? The shape of the LCA's has no bearing on how the car handles...the rectangular or tube LCA's both do the same thing..add stability to the rear suspension.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts