|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Performance Anything you ever wanted to know about boosting the performance of your Cavalier. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
vortech supercharger
i was curious what one would run in the quarter with the vortech kit on a 2.2/auto...ive searched but have found nothing....the charger with the intake, and a full exhaust..
thanks, David
__________________
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: vortech supercharger
Probably low 15s to high 14s, depending on how much boost you run
__________________
MAKE ART, NOT WAR |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vortech supercharger
a stock 2.2 proly couldnt handle more than 5-6 lbs. of boost max until something blew, whether it be valves, pistons, n e thing. W/ 5 lbs it would proly run high 14's low 15's as kustmace said. I would seriously consider getting new cams and springs before any forced induction is added. w/o the s/c, but w/ the rebuild, intake, and exaust, the car would still make pretty good power gains
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vortech supercharger
how mod friendly are these blocks/heads? (2200)
__________________
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: vortech supercharger
Quote:
The Mod-Friendly motors are the Twin Cams and the Ecotecs
__________________
1992 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 *R.I.P.* 3.1L MPFI (3.1 6cylinder Pushrod 12V) 1997 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 *R.I.P.* 2.4L "Twin Cam" (2.4 4cylinder DOHC 16V) 2003 Honda Accord EX V6 - The new hotness |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vortech supercharger
agreed, i was gonna ask wat year u had, but w/ my personal experience w/ an 00 2.2, a 99 z24 and my own 03 ecotec, i would say the ecotec by far, and the 2.2 way in last, not a lot of room and a lot of tricky things about the older models u have to be careful of
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: vortech supercharger
Quote:
The Ecotec is just plain all-around solid, but takes to boost like a son of a bitch. A turbo ecotec is a beast that few 4-bangers can keep pace with. The OHV is a great configuration for any non-inline motor. I mean, hell, everything from the Vette to the Viper has mastered the pushrod, but it's just not as useful for an inline motor. They do, however, have very VERY solid pickup in the low RPMs. My old 3.1 launched like a BEAST, but in the higher RPMs it dogged down. Ah..the joy that was 185 lb/tq from the factory.
__________________
1992 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 *R.I.P.* 3.1L MPFI (3.1 6cylinder Pushrod 12V) 1997 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 *R.I.P.* 2.4L "Twin Cam" (2.4 4cylinder DOHC 16V) 2003 Honda Accord EX V6 - The new hotness |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|