photo critique

[adamth3aw3som3]

here is the link to my cardomain site. would like if you guys would let me know what you think, and what i could do to improve. also, any ideas for the car are welcome too.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2148203

[92zcamaroperson]

....might wanna take another stab at that link

[KaotiKCamaro5]

link works fine for me.. nice car!

[Rally Sport]

Sweet car, love the black hood and tail. Also this picture is one of the best.



Now if the lighting in the background wasnt so bright, it'd be way better.

[92zcamaroperson]

hmmm....now the link shows....wonder why it didnt at first.....freakin dial-up.....

[Xenostalgia]

Nice car, not sure about the est 12.5 @110 w/ 400hp tho have a slip?

[balls_to_the_wall]

I have no idea what kind of camera you are using to take those photos....soo heres my critique of the photos. Damn Nice car for starters.

But, the background (sky) is overexposed.
Try to take the light meter reading off of the acutal car, or your hand, don't let it see the sky. If you are using a digital, it is easier because you can see instant results.

Need a smaller depth of field.
Use a smaller f-stop, something along the lines of idk, F 5.6 and a shutter speed of somewhere around 500-1000th/sec.

I would find a different background that isn't as "busy", Those trees and leaves are kind of distracting imho.

If you don't understand what the heck I just said, don't worry about it.

-Ryan

[Matt365]

Originally Posted by balls_to_the_wall

I have no idea what kind of camera you are using to take those photos....soo heres my critique of the photos. Damn Nice car for starters.

But, the background (sky) is overexposed.
Try to take the light meter reading off of the acutal car, or your hand, don't let it see the sky. If you are using a digital, it is easier because you can see instant results.

Need a smaller depth of field.
Use a smaller f-stop, something along the lines of idk, F 5.6 and a shutter speed of somewhere around 500-1000th/sec.

I would find a different background that isn't as "busy", Those trees and leaves are kind of distracting imho.

If you don't understand what the heck I just said, don't worry about it.

-Ryan

huh?

[adamth3aw3som3]

Originally Posted by Xenostalgia

Nice car, not sure about the est 12.5 @110 w/ 400hp tho have a slip?

ya, i dont know if its for real, but the prev. owner was telling me that 400 was a low reading, he had a slip but he kept all of his racing stuff in his garage in a frame. ive actually never ran it at the strip yet, but i can definately see how it could, after driving it. considering all of the other mods i have done (770 street avenger carb, port, polish, total engine overhaul, total trannie overhaul, k&n air filter) i can imagine its more or less in the 450 range at this point. but i like to stick with a number that im a little bit more confident with. so i stick with the 400 hp. anyways... thanks for the tips guys, doesnt seem like there is many 2nd gen. camaro's here. is this true?

[Xenostalgia]

nope i don see mny 2nd gens anywhere, get that baby on a dyno and run her down a track ge tsome slips to frame for your own garage!

[Rally Sport]

Yeah it's true, aside from you the only person with another 2nd gen is Jim, he has a 454 in his and its currently under repairs.

[adamth3aw3som3]

i was actually supposed to dyno it a few weeks back. but decided instead to go Pierre(capitol of south dakota) and watch NHRA action instead. next spring after i get lower gears, and a tougher driveline im def. going to run it. seems the 2nd gens are getting tougher to come by... i hope.

[drvngstorm05]

..... i think i nutted myself... damn that's a sexy car, idk anything about taking pictures... but i know that car is hot

[I-ROC KID]

very wicked car

[camaromaniac]

its strange how that 2nd gen camaros are so rare these days since they sold so many