|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2005 taurus vs 1997 taurus
what hapened? i was getting good gas milage with my 1997 taurus 20mpg, my mpg display on my 2005 taurus states 17 mpg but i know i'm getting less. same size engine in both. what did Ford do so different. more air pollution devices? confused .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I know you have a 3.0 in both but, is one the DOHC 24V Duratec engine (200HP) and is the other the Vulcan engine(160HP plain jane engine). That would make a difference, don't forget the 05 is a little bigger than the 97.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2005 taurus vs 1997 taurus
also, you get much worse gas mileage with your AC on, have you been driving more with the AC on than you did in your '97?
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|