 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Quality Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems. |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
05-04-2002, 10:56 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
h22 or h23
There seems to be a lot of confusion on this topic. Which of these two engines is the best to turbocharge?
__________________
97 Accord EX Coupe (H22A) _____________________________ 18" Focal SD5 225/40/18 Kuhmo Ecsta Supra (712) AEM Cold Air Intake Walbro 255lph Intank Fuel Pump HP Racing Exhaust 2.25 Custom Piping Spoon Radiator Cap Katzkin two-tone Leather 3 JL Audio 10W3s Kenwood DPX-4020 Double Din |
|
|
|
|
05-04-2002, 11:55 AM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: westminster, California
Posts: 1,873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
if i were to choose..i'd go with the h23. even though the h22 has more power stock. i think the h23 has more potenial because of it's extra displacement. besides..who needs vtec when you got turbo?
__________________
I love them sub wufers |
|
|
|
|
|
05-21-2002, 01:58 AM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tha Boro
Posts: 2,550
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
the h23 is better for turbo because of the compression which means that u can run more boost than if u had turbo on an h22
__________________
HöÑÐ㧠4 Lïƒê |
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
