|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
08-18-2005, 01:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
99 Vr4 vs. 02 Firehawk
which is better for 0-60, 1/4, braking, salom, top speed, etc.?
|
|
#2
08-18-2005, 03:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 99 Vr4 vs. 02 Firehawk
The Firehawk is better for straight line, and they're probably about even in the handling department.
|
|
#3
08-19-2005, 01:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 99 Vr4 vs. 02 Firehawk
Firehawk should be superior in everything except maybe high speed roadholding due to its higher power and lower weight.
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec
|
|
#5
08-19-2005, 06:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
1999 Mitsubishi GTO VR4 (3000GT VR4)
3.0L Twin Turbo 6-Cylinder 320HP 315TQ 6-Speed Manual 3780Lbs AWD 0-60- 5.3 Seconds 1/4 Mile- [email protected] 2002 T/A Firehawk Engine: LS1 5.7 liter (346 cubic inch) rated at 345 hp, 350 lb-ft Transmission: T56 6 speed manual The times I found for the Firehawk were in the 13s. I hear though they could hit 12s with a really good driver. I'm just guessing the performance of the Firehawk is that of the SS.
__________________
For a long time it gave me nightmares... witnessing an injustice like that... it's a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be... I can still hear them taunting him....... silly rabbit, tricks are for kids... I mean, WHY COULDN'T THEY JUST GIVE HIM SOME CEREAL? Quote:
|
|
#6
08-19-2005, 09:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 99 Vr4 vs. 02 Firehawk
Firehawks are faster than SS Camaros, WS6 Trans Ams are on par with the Camaro SS.
|
|
#7
08-20-2005, 04:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 99 Vr4 vs. 02 Firehawk
Firehawk all the way
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel 
|
|
#8
08-27-2005, 09:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Firehawk should be quicker, but, as most things come down to, the driver makes all the difference. The strength of the VR4 in any race would be off the line and pretty even in the twisties. I know which I'd rather have but in a numbers game the Firehawk comes out in front.
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
|
|
#9
09-07-2005, 09:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 99 Vr4 vs. 02 Firehawk
the vr4 would launch faster but the firehawk would quickly catch up and win by a little. vr4 prob. handles a little better. the vr4 is so damn heavy though.
__________________
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
