-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > Silverado
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-12-2005, 09:11 AM
Nigel215's Avatar
Nigel215 Nigel215 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
is this safe?

just a quick question..ive been running 89 octane gas for about a year now, but the price of gas is really killing me. is it safe for me to just go back to 87 again? I dont have any custom tune or anything, but i was just curious if this would cause a knock or something, or just not be good for the engin? thanks
__________________


2000 Silverado LS 4.8, K&N FIPK, Gibson Extreme Dual Exhaust, Line-X Bedliner, Black Speed Grille, Viper Alarm System, Custom Audio system.... (need to update my pic)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2005, 09:49 AM
Seabornman Seabornman is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've never run anything but 87, and it does just fine. I have an '01 4x4 with 4.8 engine. I agree, there is a big price jump to 89 octane.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2005, 10:14 AM
BowtieX3 BowtieX3 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Your Owner's Manual has factory suggested fuel recommendations. It will say what you should run...however, keep this in mind...the higher the octane, the cleaner the fuel, meaning the more complete burn you'll acheive, meaning the better mpg you'll get. You'll also have less carbon running through your engine, less potential for future problems. Uncle works for Exxon...take it for what it's worth.
I know prices at the pump are horrendous (I have to run 93...6.0 HO). If you do run 87...twice a year I'd run a cleaner like the Chevron concentrate through a tank...my two cents worth!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2005, 10:27 AM
jeverett's Avatar
jeverett jeverett is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to jeverett Send a message via AIM to jeverett Send a message via MSN to jeverett Send a message via Yahoo to jeverett
Re: is this safe?

I've run 93 since the day I bought my truck almost 4 years ago. I'm swapping back to 87 next week when my new tune is here. I've got to, the 93 here is almost 2.70/gal
__________________
1998 ECSB Z71
Whelen LED's
Kenwood 2-way
"BIG 3"
2500+ watt audio

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2005, 12:14 PM
jers99z jers99z is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 185
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jers99z Send a message via MSN to jers99z Send a message via Yahoo to jers99z
i would say if you dont have a chip or tune done running 87 should be just fine, ive been thinking about taking my chip out just to run 87, gas prices are ridiculous in hawaii and driving over the mountains aint exactly fuel efficient
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2005, 12:17 PM
White Lightening's Avatar
White Lightening White Lightening is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is it worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeverett
I've run 93 since the day I bought my truck almost 4 years ago. I'm swapping back to 87 next week when my new tune is here. I've got to, the 93 here is almost 2.70/gal
I did a calculation as follows:
If a truck owner drives 15,000 miles per year averaging only 18 miles per gallon using 92 octane and the difference in gas price for 92/93 to $2.70 per gallon versus $2.50 for 87 octane fuel. Lets also use the fact that the average (MPG) would go from 18 (with premium) to 17 (using regular). The actual net difference in cost ====== $45.00 a year.

As a result - it seems it would not pay to switch to lower octane. In my area - the difference in price from premium to regular is only 12 cents a gallon where I get gas. However I had used 20 cents in the calculation - to even try harder to favor regular. Even under those conditions - $45.00 just isn't worth the difference in my opinion - I'll stick with premium till it cost justifies a switch.
__________________
.
. . .>>>>> . .White Lightening . .<<<<<

More pictures???
Link below shows them & a list of features and options on this 2wd SS
V.H.O.

http://files.automotiveforums.com/ga...ite+Lightening

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2005, 12:33 PM
Nigel215's Avatar
Nigel215 Nigel215 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: is this safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieX3
Your Owner's Manual has factory suggested fuel recommendations. It will say what you should run...however, keep this in mind...the higher the octane, the cleaner the fuel, meaning the more complete burn you'll acheive, meaning the better mpg you'll get. You'll also have less carbon running through your engine, less potential for future problems. Uncle works for Exxon...take it for what it's worth.
I know prices at the pump are horrendous (I have to run 93...6.0 HO). If you do run 87...twice a year I'd run a cleaner like the Chevron concentrate through a tank...my two cents worth!
Yea, that is one of the reason i started running 89 in the first place, for everything to run a little cleaner.
__________________


2000 Silverado LS 4.8, K&N FIPK, Gibson Extreme Dual Exhaust, Line-X Bedliner, Black Speed Grille, Viper Alarm System, Custom Audio system.... (need to update my pic)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2005, 12:36 PM
sportin83 sportin83 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to sportin83 Send a message via Yahoo to sportin83
i try to run 89 most of the time, but i get 87 once in a while. sometimes if i have a few extra bucks i though in 92 or 93. the way i look at it is if you run 87 then once and a while i have been told you need to run a fuel cleaner throught the system, but that is like 4 buck s a bottle so what are you saving by going cheaper on gas?? my 2 cents
__________________
2002 CHEVY SILVERADO
more pics at http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2228127



more pics at http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2228127
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2005, 02:58 PM
twomorestrokes's Avatar
twomorestrokes twomorestrokes is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
87 octane is fine with your stock truck. That's all I use in my 6.0. and I rag it hard. It is a waste of money to use higher octane than you need to in a stock vehicle. Although it won't hurt anything, you are not doing your engine any special favors by spending more $$ on slower burning fuel. Higher octane is only needed to prevent preignition when the compression or timing has been altered, or if it is a special factory performance package.

As far as cleaner burning goes, the big oil compaies have gotten you believing that. If anything, using higher octane than you need to has the possibility of being less clean. All higher octane does for you is make the mixture harder to ignite in your cylinders. If you are having detonation problems then higher octane is for you. If it runs good on 87, then it is actually burning faster and cleaner with lower octane.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-12-2005, 04:12 PM
Ape0r Ape0r is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ape0r
Re: is this safe?

89/93 are not any cleaner at all than 87, except with brands such as Shell that offer additional advertised cleaning agents. The octane number relates to resistence to combustion, you will achieve a more complete burn with the CORRECT octane rating. If you have a 93 tune, use 93. If you have no tune, use 87.
__________________
'04 Silverado 1500 4x4 5.3L 3.73 G80
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-12-2005, 05:29 PM
White Lightening's Avatar
White Lightening White Lightening is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: is this safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ape0r
89/93 are not any cleaner at all than 87, except with brands such as Shell that offer additional advertised cleaning agents. The octane number relates to resistence to combustion, you will achieve a more complete burn with the CORRECT octane rating. If you have a 93 tune, use 93. If you have no tune, use 87.
Actually Ape0r, thats not quite correct. Many GM products benefit from using premium gas. Octane numbers - as you mentioned - do relate to resistance to combustion. 93 has more resistance than does 87. But its compression ratios when used in conjunction with octane numbers that give you the right choices. I have a 10:1 ratio compression - and using premium is needed. The result of using premium with higher compression levels - will give better mileage and better performance. Similarly - using premium gas with a low compression engine - gives you unburned hydro carbons, poorer mileage, and a loss of power. Most bigger block V8's improve with premium. Most V6 engines work better with 87 octane (because they don't have high compression).
__________________
.
. . .>>>>> . .White Lightening . .<<<<<

More pictures???
Link below shows them & a list of features and options on this 2wd SS
V.H.O.

http://files.automotiveforums.com/ga...ite+Lightening

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-12-2005, 05:37 PM
NoRiceHere01 NoRiceHere01 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: is this safe?

thank u for knowing wut ur talking about haha. im tired of explaining to people wut octane ratings mean. these things run fine on 87 and ur engines not gonna notice the switch. running a certain fuel in ur engine does not condition it one way or another. my 76 ran on 87 like it was supposed to until i advanced the timing to a suitable level and then put an advance curve kit in the distributor. i thought i killed something cuz of the noise it made until i took my dad for a ride to show him and he was like "u need better gas idiot u know wut u just did to the timing?" unless u got a tune or raised the compression ur better off with 87. if not for the price, as white lightning pointed out, then for emissions. if u use a fuel that does not burn completely then ur actually increasing bad emissions. not that i care. emissions regs suck. now that i think about it, if i read the advice i just gave, i would be no closer to a desicion then before i read it. please ignore me, its been a long day.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-12-2005, 05:50 PM
Slowprocess's Avatar
Slowprocess Slowprocess is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Slowprocess
Running 28 degrees of timing and nitrous.....I think I'll stick with 93.
__________________

Daily Driver- 00 Camaro SS A4 1/4- 12.30@118mph 2.14-60ft on street tires
Weekend Warrior-99 Silverado "Dirty" 1/4-11.63@118mph 1.8-60ft
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-12-2005, 06:53 PM
broughy84's Avatar
broughy84 broughy84 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Re: is this safe?

Wanna here something sad.......

At BP here gas is $2.22 for 87, 2.32 for 89, and 2.42 for 93.

At Casey's its $2.27 for 87, and $2.20 for 90, yes that is right, it is not a type, premium is cheaper. The Reason being, they have a larger tank tank BP (as they are across the highway) and they can buy in huge quantity... Low price = high demand

At D&B 87 is 2.52 and 89 is 2.85 this station is only 10 blocks from the others. What a difference!
__________________
Matthew Brough
1997 Geo Prizm -- 301,000 miles
2000 Honda Accord -- 225,000 miles
2004 GMC Yukon XL -- 223,000 miles

1987 Jeep Comanche -- 116,000 miles


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-12-2005, 07:05 PM
jeverett's Avatar
jeverett jeverett is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to jeverett Send a message via AIM to jeverett Send a message via MSN to jeverett Send a message via Yahoo to jeverett
Re: is this safe?

I'm broke, im going back to 87
__________________
1998 ECSB Z71
Whelen LED's
Kenwood 2-way
"BIG 3"
2500+ watt audio

Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > Silverado


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts