-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-25-2005, 11:09 PM
keeva1220 keeva1220 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
240sx vs. 300zx tt

The s13 240sx and the z32 300zx tt both seem to all have they're pro's and con's but which car would be best overall? I am debating this bc i am looking into possible purchasing one of the two in the future.

The s13 240sx is said to have great stock handling but for any serious engine mods ud prolly have to look into an engine swap.

The z32 300zx tt would probably need some suspension work but could pretty good performance gains with a few smaller mods (ECU, air intake, exasut, etc.)

Anybody feel like adding on to these short lists of pro's and con's?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:39 AM
Broke_as_****'s Avatar
Broke_as_**** Broke_as_**** is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well you are really looking at two cars with completely different design intents in mind.

The 240SX was never meant to be a sports car really. Sporty? Sure. It handles the corners pretty well, brakes have some good intial bite and the ease of the SR20 swap or a KA turbo kit is at the level of weekend mechanics. However the stock suspension will all have to go for any kind of hard use at higher speeds, the stock brakes heat up far too fast for prolonged braking and as mentitioned, any amount of power will require a turbo kit or engine swap. You can do a turbo kit for the KA motor for $1500 or so provided your engine is in good shape, otherwise it would be better to rebuild or replace it with a lower mile engine first.

The Z is a dyed in the wool sports car. Suspension work? Not really, it handles better stock that most cars will with aftermarket bits. Brakes are a bit undersized for the car at only 11.1 inches up front but 12 inch brakes that will fit under the stock rims are only a $550 upgrade (MSW for FYI). The VG motor makes power with ease, 400hp is an ECU, cone intake and cat-back exhaust away. Even running stock turbos you can get down into the 11s at the 1/4 mile track and run in excess of 180 mph.

I own both. I was originally going to buy another daily driver and stick an RB25 in the 240. However I started adding up how much it would cost, where it would get me and I just bought the Z. I would have ended up spending more modifying 240SX then I spent just buying the Z and ended up with not much more performance then the stock Z and nowhere really to go short of turning into barely legal street going race car. The Z just has way more potential because it was designed to go fast.

It would really help to know what you plan to do with the car. If you are looking for a good daily driver that you can get some decent performance out of then the 240 is probably the way to go. If you are looking for a serious performance machine then get the Z.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo


Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:43 AM
k3smostwanted's Avatar
k3smostwanted k3smostwanted is offline
Z Cars Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to k3smostwanted
the 300zx Twin Turbo will need suspension mods to do what? compete with ferrari's?

there is no way this should even be a comparison on overall standard performance. do people simply forget that the 240sx was built for sporty economy purposes only in the US?

bottom line: if your buying a car for performance and you can afford the 300zxTT, buy it. there is a reason why 300zxTT's are selling for $13k-$25k and S13 240sx's should not be sold for over $4k.

the only cons i can picture against the 300zxTT when comparing it to a 240sx is simply it weighs about 500lbs more. but the 300hp and performance oriented suspension more than makes up for its weight.

EDIT: 4 minutes too slow...
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2005, 01:58 AM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

The 240SX is not in the same league as the 300ZX TT. There is no question that the 300ZX TT is faster in every way, so it all depends on how much you want to spend and how much performance you want.
__________________

My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2005, 11:54 AM
Sticky Sticky is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 267
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Sticky
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

The 240 SX is cheaper...but that's all that it has going for it against the 300zx.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2005, 04:12 PM
G-man422's Avatar
G-man422 G-man422 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to G-man422
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

300zx TT is faster, and overall better than the 240sx.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-2005, 08:25 PM
King Of Crunk's Avatar
King Of Crunk King Of Crunk is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

the 300zx would pwn the 240sx in every way...
__________________

DO IT REAL BIG CREW #1
THE OLD DIRTY BASTARDS CREW #5
2004 Honda CBR 1000RR - It Gets The Ladies
2004 Caddilac Escalade - Brings 'Em Home
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-26-2005, 11:23 PM
keeva1220 keeva1220 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I didnt mean to make myself sound stupid, i realize the cars a pretty different. I was just looking at all the pro's and con's of the 2 cars, sorry bout that.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-27-2005, 12:05 AM
King Of Crunk's Avatar
King Of Crunk King Of Crunk is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

it'd be different if you would compare a 240sx with a SR20DET in it and with some mild suspension mods.....then it would be a pretty good comparo, but since they're both stock the 300zx pwnz the 240, however i think the 240sx LOOKS better...hehe
__________________

DO IT REAL BIG CREW #1
THE OLD DIRTY BASTARDS CREW #5
2004 Honda CBR 1000RR - It Gets The Ladies
2004 Caddilac Escalade - Brings 'Em Home
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-27-2005, 12:09 AM
Broke_as_****'s Avatar
Broke_as_**** Broke_as_**** is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

What are you looking for from this car?

The 240 is a good daily driver. It's not very fast on the straight line and there isn't much you can do to it to get much power short of turbo kit or engine swap. It is pretty fun to toss around and it handles pretty good for a stock ride, the wide torque band of the KA makes it a pretty good canyon carver. Good intake and exhaust set up on a KA yields 150-160rwhp if I remember correctly. It will be cheaper to fix, insure, and fuel. It also has a very functional rear storage shelf mistakenly labeled as the "back seat".

The Z is a sports car. Parts aren't cheap, needs more routine maintence and insurance is not going to be pretty. But if you are looking for a performance machine then it is certainly that. Simple upgrades yield surprising power gains and a healthy aftermarket means the sky is the limit for upgrading. It's more than civilized rnough to make a good daily driver but I personally think it's kind of a waste to use it in such fashion.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo


Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-30-2005, 02:25 AM
liquidPunk's Avatar
liquidPunk liquidPunk is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 778
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to liquidPunk
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

the 300 without a dought is faster but i say unless you are rich or a great mech. you'd probably be better off with the 240, but id take a nice 300 anyday. though i did hear they had rusting out issues on the bottom (true?).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-30-2005, 03:49 AM
Broke_as_****'s Avatar
Broke_as_**** Broke_as_**** is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidPunk
the 300 without a dought is faster but i say unless you are rich or a great mech. you'd probably be better off with the 240, but id take a nice 300 anyday. though i did hear they had rusting out issues on the bottom (true?).
Never heard of rust being a problem. Don't really have to be rich but 300ZX is probably not for anyone on a shoestring budget. The non-turbo isn't that bad but the Twin Turbo is somewhat pricey to own.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo


Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-30-2005, 07:36 AM
k3smostwanted's Avatar
k3smostwanted k3smostwanted is offline
Z Cars Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to k3smostwanted
actually, nissan went to extreme measures to make sure the bottom of the Z32 doesnt rust. it has a textured surface which doesnt allow water to sit flesh on the surface and from what i can tell it isnt even metal on the bottom. it seems to be all urethane or a layer of urethane over metal on the side skirts....if your talking about the floorboards, i havent seen one yet that didnt get that rubbery undercoat layed on the undercarriage.

if you see a Z32 (90-96) with rust, its usually the strip of metal between the t-tops and the windshield.

its the Z31's (84-89) that have problems with rusting through the bottom.
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-30-2005, 07:10 PM
liquidPunk's Avatar
liquidPunk liquidPunk is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 778
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to liquidPunk
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

ohh, thanks. id been wondering about that b/c mabye thinking of saving up for a 300zx tt or a 3000gt vr4, what does everybody say
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-30-2005, 07:22 PM
King Of Crunk's Avatar
King Of Crunk King Of Crunk is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 240sx vs. 300zx tt

the older vr4s (1996-1998) look BEAUTIFUL, it all depends what you want in a car.....rwd or awd...if it was my PERSONAL decision i would go with the 3KGT because they're mid 13 second cars with looks to kill...
__________________

DO IT REAL BIG CREW #1
THE OLD DIRTY BASTARDS CREW #5
2004 Honda CBR 1000RR - It Gets The Ladies
2004 Caddilac Escalade - Brings 'Em Home
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts