what's the difference between a Euro and reg 92 Lumina

[redly1]

I'm looking at a 92 Lumina V6 sedan w/75000 miles for $1200. seems like it's in great shape. Plus, I just happen to have a set of wheels from a Euro.

Just curious what other differences there are between a standard lumina and a Eurosport Lumina sedan

thanks

[tblake]

the tire sizes are different, not sure exactly, but, you will have to put new tires on the euro rims, although they should be a direct bolt up. Dont quote me on that though. Anyone else have any takes on this?

[redly1]

yeah, I've got mich tires onthe wheels. They are currently on my 91 Lesabre

[Radman3120]

The Euro is a "Sportier" (looking) version, thats all.

[montecarlossfan]

euro sport should have a 3.4 dohc motor which is a ballsy engine...I currently have one as well as a 2000 monte ss....the lumina has alot mor punch to it.

[redly1]

I had a 3.4L in a cutlass convertible once upon a time. I loved that friggen engine.

I've heard stories of incredibly high priced repairs on that engine though. any thoughts?

[BigMikeyB]

The Euro also has a sport suspension package and sport exhaust (dual outlet).

[richtazz]

The euro package consisted of ground effects, a rear spoiler, and 16" wheels. Most euro's came with the 3.4 DOHC engine, but not all. The wheels will fit on your car, but may throw off your speedo due to a taller overall height of the 16" tire/wheel combo.

[jeffcoslacker]

The DOHC 3.4 is OK as long as timing belt maintenance is done. When they break, it wrecks the motor pretty good. They are kinda shoehorned in there, and some repairs are a PITA.

I'd be all over that one you are looking at, but keep in mind that with that low miles and it's age, it's gonna have some bugs, especially with the rear brakes.

Cars in general, but GM FWDs in particular seem prone to what we used to call "little old lady disease" where they work fine for the owner that didn't drive very much or very far, but then totally self-destruct when bought by a normal driver.

Things that are typical:

Rear brakes siezed up
Water Pump failure
Alternator failure
Brake Master Cylinder failure
TCC sticking/failing
Exhaust rust-out from inside out
Intake Manifold gasket leaks
Distributor plug o-ring oil leak
Coil pack and module issues

Not trying to wave you off, just saying keep this in mind, I've seen too many people think that because they found a low mileage older car that they are gonna have many trouble-free miles. Usually there is about a six month period where it seems like one thing after another goes bad, but then once the kinks are all out, they are great cars and give good service.

The worst is when Grandma gives the teenage kid her Lumina for a first car. Torque is addictive and new drivers are junkies And the Lumina's V6's have plenty, feel great when you stomp them from a stop. Usually within three months, the kid has broken the motor mounts, ruined the trasaxle and driveshafts, worn out the tires.....

[BigMikeyB]

Originally Posted by jeffcoslacker

The worst is when Grandma gives the teenage kid her Lumina for a first car. Torque is addictive and new drivers are junkies And the Lumina's V6's have plenty, feel great when you stomp them from a stop. Usually within three months, the kid has broken the motor mounts, ruined the trasaxle and driveshafts, worn out the tires.....

Heehee... so I got my Lumina from my grandparents a year ago... only thing I need is new tires, though.

[Manny_boy]

Actually, most Euro's came with the 3.1L. The 3.4L was an option, and the door of the car actually says 3.4Euro, unless it was debadged. The car that came stock with the 3.4L is the Z34 (not a Euro, according to some enthusiasts).

The maintenence isn't that bad, as long as you stay on top of it. If you neglect that engine, it will bite you...hard. The parts for that engine seem to be getting scarce (even at the dealer). Its not an engine I would recommend to someone who was not an auto enthusiast, or who was unwilling to do the work themselves.