|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
3000GT Vs. Impala SS
Lets keep it short and sweet, im on the highway this morning and he blows past me, i drop it in third catch up to him at about 110 and put about 3 cars on him to 140 he pulls even i give him the thumbs up and that was it, the look on his face went something like this. :22yikes: and i was like
__________________
1995 3000GT SL (RED) My mods: Custom true dual exhaust with x pipe K&N FIPK 17 inch forged aluminum billet rims from WELD EVO
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
it really is a shame that their SS model is a 3.8 liter v6 that is super charged, yet its slower then the V6 anything that came out of japan without any special tacky factory badging.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
Nice kill, I always wondered how they performed...I guess not as well as I expected.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4 -K&N FIPK -Proboost mbc -Cusco front + rear strut bars -Greddy type-s -ATR downpipe -no cats -15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly. Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
dude TatII shutup the 3.8 rocks, u have no idea what ur talking about, I don't see any japanese V6's cranking out a whopping 280 lb ft. of torque like the supercharged 3.8, the extra displacement roxs
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
power is only part of the battle. building a car that actually makes use of it is the other. obviously the Impala makes poor use of the power..
__________________
96 EJ6. Future home of boosted B18C1.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
there is no doubt about its power potential. we all see with that the gtp's and comp G's. jeffsgtpsleeper is an 11 second car. however its stock output is really nothing and almost every n/a japanese v6 makes more power and are faster stock.
but reguardless putting the SS badge on that car is a joke. the older lt1 powered impalas were much better.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
Yeah, I'd rather have an Lt1...It's too bad GM doesn't seem to like V8 RWD as much anymore.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
Quote:
VQ35DE 274-ft-lbs 287hp VQ40DE 291ft-lbs 270hp all without a high rpm killing roots blower then again peakpower doesnt mean jack without power under the curve |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
Quote:
__________________
RX-7 TII |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
A stock VR-4 makes 315lb ft of tourque at 2500 rpm's hows that for japanese v6 torque L98driver
__________________
1995 3000GT SL (RED) My mods: Custom true dual exhaust with x pipe K&N FIPK 17 inch forged aluminum billet rims from WELD EVO
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
L98Driver as well as every other v6 from japan mentioned how about the Toyota Supra twin turbo that make 315 tq.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
rb26dett rb25det rb20det vg30dett vq30det even the SR series puts down good numbers
man the list just goes on and on and on and on... |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
ummm
it does not say new or old impala so was it the new one?
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 3000GT Vs. Impala SS
Yes it was a new one, a 2005 i believe, it looked like this
it also had dual exhaust and rims.
__________________
1995 3000GT SL (RED) My mods: Custom true dual exhaust with x pipe K&N FIPK 17 inch forged aluminum billet rims from WELD EVO
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|