|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
long tube vs shorty
which is better, long tube or shorty headers, whats the difference and the pros and cons of each. there goin on a 99 v6 so whatever info yall got would b appreciated
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
Longs are the way to go, but the reason why longs are not always installed is because of how much room there is to work with.
__________________
R32 GTR w/351w .020 forged, 8.9:1, PTK T76, Turbosmart 40 BC & 45 WG, Tial 40 BV, AFR 205s 310/245, 228/228 550/550 114 Hydro, 1.7rr, Isky RLs, 4" HKS exhaust, ARC 30x16x4 IC, 8 point cage, C2 gauges, 2 step, C4 3200 stall w/ R Manual & Hurst Ratchet shifter, 17" Panasport G7s, CSU 750 & bonnet, Vic Jr intake, 3.63 gears, Corbeau Carrera seats, Custom wide body, Bomex side skirts and rear 1/4 caps, Tommy Kaira bumper. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
but yea whats the differenc between them?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
With short tubes you get better low end, and with long tubes you get better top end power
__________________
89 Camaro with lt1/t56/headers,borla exhaust,ac delete, march pulleys, slp CAI,3.73 gears,msd ignition,port & polished heads, reprogrammed pc, free mods, hotchkis suspension,sub-frame conn & weight reduction. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
While that is true what Smokey said, the Longtubes have much more potential of proving more power down the line. As you continue to mod your car to bring in more air, the long tubes will benefit from it more than the shorties will.
Long tubes are always the better way to go! Although I believe shorties have a better chance of passing smog than LTs do.
__________________
2000 WS6 Sponsored by Dynamic Motorsports (DMS) www.dynamicmotorsports.com - Forged 402 LS2 / DMS Lowering Springs / DMS LCAs / DMS Adj Panhard / DMS SFCs / DMS Brackets / DMS STB / DMS K-members / DMS Driveshaft Loop / STG II Heads / Custom Monster Cam / NX Wet Kit / Moser Rear w/ 4.10s / DMS Shaft Mount Rockers / FAST 90mm LSX Intake / FAST 90mm TB / Meziere Electric Water Pump / DMS MAF / DMS Lid / Custom True Dual Exhaust |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
i don't know anything about smog, but i can tell you that lts will provide much more power and fuel efficiency. lts are much more responcive to other bolt-ons as well and will less likely be a power bottleneck down the line as you develope your engine. The draw backs aren't too terrible, but something to consider. lts are more expensive and are often followed by more exensive exaust parts. they are also much harder to fit in the engine bay, i've heard of guys not even having to pull their engines to swap shorties, but extensive work is done to get lts in place. When i upgraded to lts i had the shop take care of it, also they selected an appropriate h-pipe. the converters are highflow - but are said to better handle emissions and when i last had my car smogged it passed with flying colors.
i might go so far to say that there are no good reasons to favor shorties to lts.
__________________
free hypsi87!! Dan's White Horse Bring back Melt Crew 002 - 3657 posts can't be wrong! |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
Also if your engine is fairly stock it is likely that there are other less intrusive mods that will yield bigger gains than the headers. I am sure that since its a V6 you don't want to go overboard on serious mods or else you will negate the price difference of the V8. If you want an edge I would recomend some gears if you don't already have them. Just my point of view.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: long tube vs shorty
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
but just so no one takes that the wrong way... im not trying to say a v6 is a better buy, it isnt.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
Long tube headers are designed to capture the resonance in the exhaust flow. They can be designed for torque or horsepower, which varies the tube diameter and length. They typically are around 32 to 34 inches of primary length. That's the length needed (and it changes by engine design and purpose) to resonate correctly. Shorty headers are too short to catch the stronger pulses, but may have a minor effect at certain rpms. (I've never tried to calculate tubes that short.) They do however flow much better than the old cast iron logs and weigh less. Free-flowing versions without the factory pinches and kinks are probably worth having, but may not be the best bang-for-the-buck until you add more airflow. Shorties are a packaging device more than a performance device.
__________________
Remember: Don't confuse noise with horsepower! and Junk is junk, even when it's on sale! "I would never doubt your expertise....it's obvious you wrote the book on stupidity!" DD |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: long tube vs shorty
There have been dyno comparisons in the last several MM&FF's between shorties and long tubes. FRPP Shorties were worth around 7 HP over stockers. That all came at 4000+ and lost power to the stockers at low RPM's. The long tubes kicked the crap out of the stockers at all RPM's, putting on 10-15 ft-lbs all over the entire powerband. If you don't have to worry about emissions you have no reason not to go long tubes. I don't know why people think they cost you low end power, because they don't.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|