|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#2
05-16-2005, 12:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
Quote:
every other aspect of the performance i would give the edge to the 300zxTT eventhough someone will probably argue my statement. as for the N/A versions: there dead even i would say...i have heard of N/A's beating SL's and i have heard of SL's beating N/A's. if they are 5-speed probably boils down to driver. if its automatic, probably who knows their car better and who can brake launch better in the 1/4 mile. i would give the edge to the 300zx on the average for this one due to the RWD vs. FWD when launching. as for handling, i will give that to either 300zx eventhough either 3000gt is a very good handling even for the weight of the VR4 and the FWD of the SL. i myself have beating 2 SL's in my N/A days...1 stock and 1 lightly modified. and i had a 2+2 automatic with pop-charger and cat-back...
__________________
 ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
#3
05-16-2005, 02:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
I'd give it to the 300ZX N/A. FWD starts to become a liability once you exceed two-hundred ft-lbs of torque, and the 300ZX is gonna have a much easier time managing tire slip on corner exit. If you just care about drag racing, then either one will work fine, but again, FWD is gonna make launching a bitch, and it'll come back to haunt you once you start tuning the car up.
__________________
 My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. 
|
|
#4
05-16-2005, 03:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
Between the TT versions...the VR4 on the launch but the Z will catch up due to less weight
Between the NA versions...the Z for being RWD and getting a better launch and it will stay ahead
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel 
|
|
#5
05-16-2005, 07:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
As much as I like the Z I think I'll give it to the VR-4. It's a very close race though either way you cut it and you can't go wrong with either.
__________________
For a long time it gave me nightmares... witnessing an injustice like that... it's a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be... I can still hear them taunting him....... silly rabbit, tricks are for kids... I mean, WHY COULDN'T THEY JUST GIVE HIM SOME CEREAL? Quote:
|
|
#6
05-16-2005, 08:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
I would (did) take the vr4 when it comes to TT, but the Z between the 2 NAs.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4 -K&N FIPK -Proboost mbc -Cusco front + rear strut bars -Greddy type-s -ATR downpipe -no cats -15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly. Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical.
|
|
#7
05-17-2005, 12:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
yeah definately the VR-4 on the launch but i think the Z in the long run
__________________
                           
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
