|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
1963 model shown below
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
1960 Ferrari 250GT LWB California Spyder
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder
Oh My God! Gorgeous Gorgeous Gorgeous
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
This Ferrari 250 GT LWB California finished 10th in the 1960 12 Hours of Sebring.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder
The roof on that thing sucks. Guess you'd always have to drive around with the top down.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
SWB model. The short wheel base models debuted in 1959.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by Jaguar D-Type; 12-05-2005 at 10:07 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder
SWB looks better though you can only see the difference from a side view (is the dark blue one really a SWB looks like LWB to me...). I guess the purpose of the LWB was to have more corner stability in a fast track. In terms of passenger space I don't see the difference. Now note how this British SWB is parked carelessly on the street like any old hatchback
(remember prices start at 1 million euro for these beauties..)![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|