|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pushrod / modular
yes i did a search before posting this! i know a thing or 2 about cars but i dont know shit compared to some of you guys, one thing that i dont know is the difference/differences between a pushrod engine and a modular engine, if anyone could tell me exactly what the difference is, it would cure my curiosity, thanks!
__________________
2001 Grand Prix GT: cat/u-bend/resonator delete, zzp PLOG, Custom Intake, DHP PCM, 1981 Fairmont 6cyl 3 speed 1978 Ford Ranchero GT 302 with a few goodies |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pushrod / modular
I'm thinking modular must refer to overhead cam engines, which don't use pushrods. Engines like the 2.4 TwinCam, or 2.2 Ecotec. Ford calls their 4.6 a modular engine, and it is overhead cam.
__________________
1999 Chevy Venture LS Extended 3.4 V6 Intake Gaskets Replaced 2003 Cavalier LS Sport Coupe, 2.2 Eco, 5 speed Getrag, all black
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pushrod / modular
Yep, the 2.2 in second gens (92) are OHV, which means it uses pushrods, and the cam is in the bottom end. Why didn't chevy make my 2.2 SOHC? Is there really a difference in power?
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|