-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > C/K
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-04-2005, 07:10 PM
jveik jveik is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
back-pressure

i was wondering if anyone knows the REAL answer to the common question that i cant find anyone with a good answer.

do you need backpressure for the engine to run properly?
i have even heard that if there is not enough backpressure then you will eventually burn up your exhaust valves. is this a fact and has anyone ever had it happen?

i need to know so that i can decide on what exhaust options are good for my old 350 to give it a deep ballsy sound
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2005, 08:02 PM
v10_viper's Avatar
v10_viper v10_viper is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,581
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to v10_viper
I have almost no back pressure because of no cats, or muffler...but there is going to be back pressure no matter what, unless your running without headers at all. Because of the bends and the design of headers/manifolds there will always be back pressure, I think how much back pressure is the question.

I think that the exhaust valves run hotter or something but i dont think that's a very serious problem. On some newer engines I know that they do require a certain amount of back pressure though, plus with all these computers and o2 censors your engine could run rough if you got rid of all that cuz of the nature of the stock ECM, right guys??

On my truck, 350 motor, it runs stock manifolds, then it goes together in a 3" tube, then splits back out to 2.5" tubing before the rear axle and then it's got it's shiny tips of course. It's been this way for 50,000 plus miles because it was this way when we bought it, if I keep my truck though I'll be redoing the entire exhaust. You could always just go with straight exhaust, then throw some glaspacks(i hate them though) on there or some Flowmaster mufflers or w/e, and it'd still sound downright sweet.
__________________
Wait a minute, you mean to say a bottle of pop is bigger than your engine??

"Pain is weakness leaving your body"

There is NO replacement, for displacement...

2007 Kawasaki ZX10-R S.E.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2005, 11:05 PM
Silverado Brethern's Avatar
Silverado Brethern Silverado Brethern is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: back-pressure

basically if you have a vortec engine (96 or newer) you have to have at least the cats for it to run properly and also the O2 sensors would go crazy with out the cats. But if its an older truck some O2 sensors could be put in place in the ones from the converter/s and i havent heard that they run worse at all due to open/free exhaust.
__________________
"Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large groups."

1997 K-1500 Silverado Vortec 350...125,610 and wounded
HD chassis package
Custom TRUE DUAL exhaust with cut-outs and Flowmaster 40 series mufflers
Poweraid Throttle Body Spacer
Custom Ram-air Intake with K&N FIPK GEN II
TFES Performance 3" Suspension Lift
Dual Air-Horn Kit with Compressor
Bed-Mounted 48" Hi-Lift Jack
Cobra Laser Radar Detector
285/75/R16 Cooper Discoverer STT's

1/4 Mile 10/15/05: 16.43 @ 91mph
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2005, 11:19 PM
SpitAndDirt's Avatar
SpitAndDirt SpitAndDirt is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 470
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: back-pressure

I'll suggest it even though most people won't read it because most people want the quick and easy answer. Read this to answer your question without any opinions just facts: "The Scientific Design of Intake and Exhaust Systems" by Phillip H. Smith. Gas flow theory, acoustics, and the physics that connect the two in regards to automotive powerplant design has not changed that much since the book was written. Check your local library. I own a personal copy of the book I picked up at the local Barnes and Noble for reference. Happy reading!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2005, 02:21 PM
jveik jveik is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so what u all are saying is that back pressure is not needed?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-2005, 07:05 PM
goinbig goinbig is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 508
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to goinbig
Re: back-pressure

Backpressure is needed. A Regular muffler like a Flowmaster will provide just about the right amount of backpressure.

Any vehicle with a turbo should have as little backpressure as possible. This is why the sell big 4-5" pipes for turbo diesels. The turbo provides all the backpressure that the engine needs...but after that you want the eshaust out as fast as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-06-2005, 12:02 AM
abaird abaird is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 456
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: back-pressure

Quote:
Originally Posted by jveik
i was wondering if anyone knows the REAL answer to the common question that i cant find anyone with a good answer.

do you need backpressure for the engine to run properly?
i have even heard that if there is not enough backpressure then you will eventually burn up your exhaust valves. is this a fact and has anyone ever had it happen?

i need to know so that i can decide on what exhaust options are good for my old 350 to give it a deep ballsy sound

You said you have an "old 350" if you mean it is an older engine, in an older truck, you can get away with about anything. My 86 with a 305 has dual glasspacks, no cats, of course.
I used to have a 92 ford with the 302 and I had the cat removed and ran true dual 2 1/4" exhaust with glasspacks out 4"tips, it was one of the better sounding vehicles with glasspacks that I ever heard. It didn't really cackle like glasspacks I think because of the tips.
My truck in the sig has straight pipes with dual cats and has been that way for 30,000 miles.
My buddy has a 2001 with the same exhaust as my 97 with no probs.
So as far as back pressure, I have heard things like everyone else in here but never seen any bad effects caused by high flow exhausts.

I think straight pipes sound pretty ballsy but they are really loud so if that isn't what you want use some mufflers.
__________________
2009 Silverado 1500
2002 Camaro Z28(rebuilder)
2005 Yamaha GP1300R
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-06-2005, 01:15 PM
jveik jveik is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: back-pressure

icic
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > C/K


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts