-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Integra
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-22-2005, 08:25 PM
Inte95gra Inte95gra is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2000 Civic Si Motor

Everyone I ask for your opinions and help I have the oportunity to drop my non-vtech from my 95se integra and put in a 00 civic si vtech motor in its place. First thing will I see gains, how much worse is it then a gsr-vtech motor. Is it really that easy to swap out and will i have to take out the stock exhaust to see gains? please reply quickly I only have a couple of days to take advantge of this sick deal
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-22-2005, 09:00 PM
Inte95gra Inte95gra is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
scratch the straight swap how hard and what do I need to do a ls/vtech
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2005, 09:06 PM
Ace$nyper's Avatar
Ace$nyper Ace$nyper is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

dont stuff a b16 in your teg or do lsvtec spend the extra for a gsr.

if you want ls vtec SEARCH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:00 PM
ShortyDTP's Avatar
ShortyDTP ShortyDTP is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 740
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to ShortyDTP Send a message via MSN to ShortyDTP
Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

A buddy of mine did that and it was was an easy swap and he's happy, but i am not so in to it ,because you are downgrading your engine from a 1.8 to 1.6.....that kinda non sense.
__________________
HOLESHOT PERFORMANCE
91 Laser Rs 471 whp at 22psi pump scm-6152e
98 Eclipse GST 11.4 @ 121mph Stock T25/nitrous
Jose Mendoza
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:57 PM
travagliante's Avatar
travagliante travagliante is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

Well from personal experience i did that. Mainly due to lack of funds! Took out a totally destroyed b1 and put a b16a gen 2 with a gsr transmission.

As you know, stock hondas=no torque!
So downgrading .2 from a 1.8L you CAN FEEL a major loss in power. But when mated to a gsr tranny, my car comes alive in the higer RPMS and pulls much harder than the b1, not as much as a gsr but close.
If i had to do it again i would probaly put the same engine in, or buy a b20 and turbo it. I would never put a P.O.S.(in my opinion) B18B1 back into my car.

But swap wise you will need to use your obd1 harness on the obd2b motor. Besides wiring vtec selinoid, pressure sensor, and knock sensor, It will be a bolt in swap. The distributor from the 00 Si motor WILL not work! You can use your stock one and cut of the bottom ear that hits the vtec selinod!

--Andrew

A 00 si motor would be great if you get a good deal on it, but otherwise a si motor + LS tranny = ugh!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2005, 10:13 AM
Inte95gra Inte95gra is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Whats the big difference between the SE tranny and The GSR tranny I have a manual obviously if im asking this question. I heard that American GSR's dont have the Limited slip.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2005, 11:04 AM
knorwj's Avatar
knorwj knorwj is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to knorwj
I would take a B16 over a B18A or B any day of the week.
__________________
Old:
1993 Acura integra gs-r

New:
1998 chevy BlaZeR2~ AKA "Jeep recovery device"

Newer:
2007 Honda CB900F "919"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2005, 11:05 AM
pepsihatman's Avatar
pepsihatman pepsihatman is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to pepsihatman
Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

Kknorwj, why?
__________________
~!~David~!~
1998 GSR, 86k miles, AEM CAI, DC 4-2-1 Ceramic Header.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-23-2005, 01:23 PM
slow_99integra's Avatar
slow_99integra slow_99integra is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 249
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inte95gra
scratch the straight swap how hard and what do I need to do a ls/vtech
first off IMO do not do the ls/vtec. it has been posted in other threads before, but here:

ls vtec work much better with high CR. stay away from a turbo ls/vtec. i looked into building this engine, and to me for the money the cons outweigh the pros. Example: the vtec head doese not fit exactly on the ls block, therefore the head must A. be machined to fit the block or B. a ls/vtec conversion kit must be used. Next: the water pump on the gsr have i believe 21teeth and the ls have 19 teeth the gsr water pump must be switched. Also the gsr oil pump to the supply the needed oil to the head. Then the ls pistons will not be a good enough CR, so itr or gsr pistons are needed. Next the vtec oil line needed to tap the block to the head. In theory this is a brand new engine and all the bearings should be replace and everything should be resurfaced. Also a vtec controller or a gsr ecu. This just seemed like too much work. if this is not built correctly it will not last
__________________
They say "speed kills drive a Honda" I say "You're right"

"I'm a kid with a grown man's mind turning corrupt" Wu Syndicate
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-23-2005, 06:46 PM
travagliante's Avatar
travagliante travagliante is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

Yep IMO, honda never made LS/VTEC engines for a reason. Now i am not saying that it cant be tuned to be reliable. But a lot of work is involved.

hey knorwj, B16 over b18, Yeah.... How do you like the b17a1? Does it seem to be equivalant to a b16a gen1?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-23-2005, 06:48 PM
travagliante's Avatar
travagliante travagliante is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortyDTP
A buddy of mine did that and it was was an easy swap and he's happy, but i am not so in to it ,because you are downgrading your engine from a 1.8 to 1.6.....that kinda non sense.
would it make sense if he was downgrading from a B18b1 to a B16B CTR?? CTR engine has all around more HP/TQ than any LS motor.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-23-2005, 11:07 PM
knorwj's Avatar
knorwj knorwj is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to knorwj
Re: Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

Quote:
Originally Posted by travagliante
hey knorwj, B16 over b18, Yeah.... How do you like the b17a1? Does it seem to be equivalant to a b16a gen1?

the way I see it the B16 is a superior motor, better r/s, higher revving, more horsepower. Now I know that the B16a has about 15 ft/lbs less torque but I honestly don't think he'll miss it too much. especially once he gets it up over 6000 rpm. One thing that I think he may run into problems with though is the fact that (correct me if I'm wrong) the 00 Si is OBD2 and the 95 integra is OBD1... so he'll have to look into that, I'm not sure whats involved in fixing that problem.


As far as how I like my B17A... well I love it, great motor for a 2nd gen... little hard to find parts for if you don't know where to look. Secret is that it is the same motor (exept for a slight stroke advantage)as a B16a3 sooo everything from a B16a3 will fit my motor exept crank and rods. I used to be able to run dead even or better than the newer B18c powered gs-r stock for stock. Just for reference my motor puts out 160 hp and 117ft/lbs torque only 6 ft/lbs more than a B16 and 10 hp less than the one he wants I think, and like I said no problems with newer gs-r's. Its too bad the B18c didn't have a better flowing head like the B16/B17/b18c5, it might have made a diffeference in its numbers.
__________________
Old:
1993 Acura integra gs-r

New:
1998 chevy BlaZeR2~ AKA "Jeep recovery device"

Newer:
2007 Honda CB900F "919"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-23-2005, 11:40 PM
travagliante's Avatar
travagliante travagliante is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

Quote:
Originally Posted by knorwj
the way I see it the B16 is a superior motor, better r/s, higher revving, more horsepower. Now I know that the B16a has about 15 ft/lbs less torque but I honestly don't think he'll miss it too much. especially once he gets it up over 6000 rpm. One thing that I think he may run into problems with though is the fact that (correct me if I'm wrong) the 00 Si is OBD2 and the 95 integra is OBD1... so he'll have to look into that, I'm not sure whats involved in fixing that problem.


As far as how I like my B17A... well I love it, great motor for a 2nd gen... little hard to find parts for if you don't know where to look. Secret is that it is the same motor (exept for a slight stroke advantage)as a B16a3 sooo everything from a B16a3 will fit my motor exept crank and rods. I used to be able to run dead even or better than the newer B18c powered gs-r stock for stock. Just for reference my motor puts out 160 hp and 117ft/lbs torque only 6 ft/lbs more than a B16 and 10 hp less than the one he wants I think, and like I said no problems with newer gs-r's. Its too bad the B18c didn't have a better flowing head like the B16/B17/b18c5, it might have made a diffeference in its numbers.
A lot of good points Plus the almost perfect 1.74 R/S ratio which allows the high revving safely.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-24-2005, 11:35 AM
boosted331 boosted331 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

You guys are completely clueless. Some of you, anyways.

A HIGH R/S RATIO DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN MOTOR A IS BETTER THAN MOTOR B AT PRODUCING HIGH RPM POWER!



Oh snap, it's a GSR revving to 10.5K, but that shouldn't happen because it has a worse R/S ratio than the B16



Another GSR revving to 10.5, WTF are they thinking!

Courtney Green, Brian Ballard, and Jason Pennman all run LS/VTEC motors in their NDRA Turbo 4 cars. I don't know if you browse Honda-Tech, but Green just made over 800 WHP on gasoline, with a street car. Go do that with a B16 if it's a superior motor

travagliante: The B16B might make the same or more PEAK horsepower and torque as a GSR motor, but it makes less average HP and torque than a GSR, which is all that matters.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-24-2005, 11:42 AM
pepsihatman's Avatar
pepsihatman pepsihatman is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to pepsihatman
Re: 2000 Civic Si Motor

What kinda work and money are we talking about with those graphs? That's insane for a teg.
__________________
~!~David~!~
1998 GSR, 86k miles, AEM CAI, DC 4-2-1 Ceramic Header.

Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Integra


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts