AEM plug and play for RB26

[tyndago]

MUSTANG Chassis Dyno test performed on a 1994 R32 GT-R RB26DETT with a (beta) 30-1621 EMS. The graph comparison was done utilizing the Skyline MAF Sensors in both instances and boost was set at 8psi for both tests. The test vehicle was completely stock.

[nismo_power]

i heard that mustang dyno's read a bit higher than dynojets. any thoughts?

[tyndago]

Originally Posted by nismo_power

i heard that mustang dyno's read a bit higher than dynojets. any thoughts?

Actually- everytime I have dynoed on a Mustang and Dynojet the Mustang has been about 30hp low compared to a Dynojet.

[nismo_power]

wierdo...cuz when i dynoed at a place with a mustang, my numbers read a bit higher than what i got off of a dynojet. but ive also heard mustangs read lower. eh. maybe each one is different, or someones effed up the maps.

[tyndago]

Originally Posted by nismo_power

wierdo...cuz when i dynoed at a place with a mustang, my numbers read a bit higher than what i got off of a dynojet. but ive also heard mustangs read lower. eh. maybe each one is different, or someones effed up the maps.

By playing with the correction factor - you can make a dyno "read" anything.

You should always test any mods back to back on the same dyno - same day to minimize tolerances.

[nismo_power]

yea i know, i always do test + tune on the same day at the same dyno. i was just comparing the two different numbers from different days.