-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Performance
Register FAQ Community
Performance Discuss Engine, Suspension, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-15-2005, 09:49 PM
lessurluck lessurluck is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to lessurluck Send a message via MSN to lessurluck
turbo vs supercharger

it seems to me that everyone has mixed feeling about either getting a super or turbo and everyone has their one opinion but whats the big difference between both, whats the pros...cons of both?



and were would i want to go to get some 3.73 gears? are they good for everyday driving or is there anything else thats better?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2005, 12:08 AM
SkylineUSA's Avatar
SkylineUSA SkylineUSA is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,895
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SkylineUSA
Re: turbo vs supercharger

Search is your friend
__________________

R32 GTR w/351w .020 forged, 8.9:1, PTK T76, Turbosmart 40 BC & 45 WG, Tial 40 BV, AFR 205s 310/245, 228/228 550/550 114 Hydro, 1.7rr, Isky RLs, 4" HKS exhaust, ARC 30x16x4 IC, 8 point cage, C2 gauges, 2 step, C4 3200 stall w/ R Manual & Hurst Ratchet shifter, 17" Panasport G7s, CSU 750 & bonnet, Vic Jr intake, 3.63 gears, Corbeau Carrera seats, Custom wide body, Bomex side skirts and rear 1/4 caps, Tommy Kaira bumper.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2005, 03:56 AM
luxrus79 luxrus79 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: turbo vs supercharger

For a V6 -turbo would do pretty good, you can smoke a stock GT if done right. For a V8 a supercharger is a better idea.

Turbo kicks in when u biuld up enough pressure when stepping on it, S/c works all the time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-16-2005, 09:18 AM
Ghost96Gt Ghost96Gt is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Ghost96Gt
Re: turbo vs supercharger

Luxrus u are partly correct about sc's working all the time.
there are two major forms of supercharging
-Centifurge is basicly a belt driven turbo the crank spins a belt which inturn spins the impealer causeing it to make boost.
-Roots style there is two forms of roots style root and twin screw design(twin screw is alittle different but is still similar) this is mounted on top of the engine and is drivin by a belt also to create boost.
A roots style creates a linear power curve pretty much all the way across from 2000 to lets say 6000. this basicly means that it achieves max boost very early and stays there all the way though.
which a centifurge builds boost and power much like a turbo doesnt create as much low end power as a roots but has a high top end.
-turbo exhaust gas spins the impeler which makes boost in laymans terms(basic).
Now in my opinion turbo is the best bascily period it is the must effiecnet design if its a 6 or a 8 with the contorl and technolioges with have now adays turbo lag basicly doesnt even exsist. it creats much more power per pound of boost. around 100 plus more hp at 15 psi then a kenne bell(twin screw the daddy of roots style). and u look at the power curve of a turbo agaisnt the centifurge and the turbo takes off almost verictaly in power while the centifurge builds power alittle slower.( i didnt know how to say this) there is downfalls to turbos they are much more expensive about a grand to 2 grand harder to install and need to be tuned. its all of whats in ur buget and what do u want. try seaching turbo vs supercharger and i bet you will come up with atleast 50 threads with great info.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2005, 06:16 PM
silverstangs's Avatar
silverstangs silverstangs is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 550
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to silverstangs
Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

causeing it to make boost.
-Roots style there is two forms of roots style root and twin screw design(twin screw is alittle different but is still similar) this is mounted on top of the engine and is drivin by a belt also to create boost.

A roots style creates a linear power curve pretty much all the way across from 2000 to lets say 6000. this basicly means that it achieves max boost very early and stays there all the way though.
which a centifurge builds boost and power much like a turbo doesnt create as much low end power as a roots but has a high top end.
-turbo exhaust gas spins the impeler which makes boost in laymans terms(basic).
Now in my opinion turbo is the best bascily period it is the must effiecnet design if its a 6 or a 8 with the contorl and technolioges with have now adays turbo lag basicly doesnt even exsist. it creats much more power per pound of boost. around 100 plus more hp at 15 psi then a kenne bell(twin screw the daddy of roots style). and u look at the power curve of a turbo agaisnt the centifurge and the turbo takes off almost verictaly in power while the centifurge builds power alittle slower.( i didnt know how to say this) there is downfalls to turbos they are much more expensive about a grand to 2 grand harder to install and need to be tuned. its all of whats in ur buget and what do u want. try seaching turbo vs supercharger and i bet you will come up with atleast 50 threads with great info.[/quote]



Not quite accurate....... there are Roots, Twin-screw and Centrifugal.

The roots superchargers are actually blowers, it moves air from one side to another, and it does not compress air, the compression is actually done in the intake manifold. It is a fixed displacement blower and the blade touch each other.

Twin screw's superchargers are similar to the roots but they actually compress air as the air moves down the impellers and out the exit port. It is a fixed displament supercharger. ALso the rotors in a twin screw do not make contact with each other unlike a roots blower. It is also pretty close to being as thermally efficient as the centrifugal superchargers.

Centrifugal superchargers are basically a high speed fan. It is not a positive displacement blower, because it does not force air down a path. The impeller or fan, which is the opening of the centrifugal blower catches the air. As the air is pulled into the blower and gets past the top of the fan blades, the centrifugal force created by rotational inertia makes the air move outward from the center of the impeller to the outter edge of the blades. This is where the venturi catches the air, speeds the velocity of the air up and directs it to a scroll. The scroll is the tubing that gets wider as it goes around the impeller. As it gets wider, the air slows down, and that creates the pressure. With the centrifugal blowers, the air can pass thru it while not rotating. It does not have a sealed chamber, and that's why it is not a positive displacement supercharger. They also need high rpms, in order to catch more air and increase pressure. The twin screw and roots don't need high rpms.
__________________
My ride at my site Silverstangs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-17-2005, 12:23 PM
importeater5_0 importeater5_0 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to importeater5_0
Re: turbo vs supercharger

you know how you can get a boost controller with a turbo and crank it up when u wanna race and down for daily driving? well can you do anything like that with a Centrifugal supercharger?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-17-2005, 01:37 PM
boosted331 boosted331 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by importeater5_0
you know how you can get a boost controller with a turbo and crank it up when u wanna race and down for daily driving? well can you do anything like that with a Centrifugal supercharger?
Get under the hood and change pullies.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-17-2005, 02:31 PM
SkylineUSA's Avatar
SkylineUSA SkylineUSA is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,895
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SkylineUSA
Re: Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted331
Get under the hood and change pullies.
Yep, I have 3. One for 8lbs, 11lbs, and 13lbs.
__________________

R32 GTR w/351w .020 forged, 8.9:1, PTK T76, Turbosmart 40 BC & 45 WG, Tial 40 BV, AFR 205s 310/245, 228/228 550/550 114 Hydro, 1.7rr, Isky RLs, 4" HKS exhaust, ARC 30x16x4 IC, 8 point cage, C2 gauges, 2 step, C4 3200 stall w/ R Manual & Hurst Ratchet shifter, 17" Panasport G7s, CSU 750 & bonnet, Vic Jr intake, 3.63 gears, Corbeau Carrera seats, Custom wide body, Bomex side skirts and rear 1/4 caps, Tommy Kaira bumper.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-17-2005, 06:49 PM
tturnpaw's Avatar
tturnpaw tturnpaw is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 293
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to tturnpaw Send a message via MSN to tturnpaw
Re: turbo vs supercharger

so for efficient power a twin screw supercharger is better than a turbo?
__________________
1982 Mustang GT- roller motor x303 cam, GT40s, MAC/Spintech exhaust MSD ignition, Edelbrock Carb, Ford Racing roller rockers

1994 Escort 2DR LX - cone air, 3.8L throttle body, FUTURE SPI turbo swap
Quote:
Cops: You can race, but Im impossible to chase!
LS WHAT?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-17-2005, 07:46 PM
boosted331 boosted331 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by tturnpaw
so for efficient power a twin screw supercharger is better than a turbo?
No.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-17-2005, 08:44 PM
silverstangs's Avatar
silverstangs silverstangs is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 550
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to silverstangs
Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by tturnpaw
so for efficient power a twin screw supercharger is better than a turbo?
Turbo's run off exhaust gasses, so they don't use horsepower to make horsepower.

ALL of the blowers are belt driven, so they use engine power to turn and make power.


Turbo's and centrifugal blowers have alot of tubing, so they appear bulky. But, polished or chromed and they look damn good

the roots and twin screw blowers sit where the upper intake would normally be, so they are compact and don't take up much room in the engine bay.
__________________
My ride at my site Silverstangs.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-17-2005, 09:58 PM
Ghost96Gt Ghost96Gt is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Ghost96Gt
Re: turbo vs supercharger

as said the turbo doesnt "rob" power from the crank it takes 900 hp to spin a top fuel drag car's blower. turbos are just more effiecent and powerful.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-18-2005, 12:37 AM
SkylineUSA's Avatar
SkylineUSA SkylineUSA is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,895
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SkylineUSA
Re: Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverstangs
Turbo's run off exhaust gasses, so they don't use horsepower to make horsepower.
They don't use as much power

Superchargers are in the 65%-80% efficiency range, while turbos are in the 80%-90% range, number off the top of my head, but in the ball park.
__________________

R32 GTR w/351w .020 forged, 8.9:1, PTK T76, Turbosmart 40 BC & 45 WG, Tial 40 BV, AFR 205s 310/245, 228/228 550/550 114 Hydro, 1.7rr, Isky RLs, 4" HKS exhaust, ARC 30x16x4 IC, 8 point cage, C2 gauges, 2 step, C4 3200 stall w/ R Manual & Hurst Ratchet shifter, 17" Panasport G7s, CSU 750 & bonnet, Vic Jr intake, 3.63 gears, Corbeau Carrera seats, Custom wide body, Bomex side skirts and rear 1/4 caps, Tommy Kaira bumper.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-18-2005, 05:53 PM
tturnpaw's Avatar
tturnpaw tturnpaw is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 293
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to tturnpaw Send a message via MSN to tturnpaw
Re: Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverstangs
Turbo's run off exhaust gasses, so they don't use horsepower to make horsepower.

ALL of the blowers are belt driven, so they use engine power to turn and make power.


Turbo's and centrifugal blowers have alot of tubing, so they appear bulky. But, polished or chromed and they look damn good

the roots and twin screw blowers sit where the upper intake would normally be, so they are compact and don't take up much room in the engine bay.
Well i knew that. I was just asking which one would be better to make more power in case i didnt know something about superchargers. Im guessing the turbo is much better.
__________________
1982 Mustang GT- roller motor x303 cam, GT40s, MAC/Spintech exhaust MSD ignition, Edelbrock Carb, Ford Racing roller rockers

1994 Escort 2DR LX - cone air, 3.8L throttle body, FUTURE SPI turbo swap
Quote:
Cops: You can race, but Im impossible to chase!
LS WHAT?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-19-2005, 01:24 AM
SkylineUSA's Avatar
SkylineUSA SkylineUSA is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,895
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SkylineUSA
Re: Re: Re: Re: turbo vs supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by tturnpaw
Well i knew that. I was just asking which one would be better to make more power in case i didnt know something about superchargers. Im guessing the turbo is much better.
Its not that they are better, both will provide more power.

Turbos are considerable harder to install, or I should say time consuming. If you don't mind the extra time, its the way to go.
__________________

R32 GTR w/351w .020 forged, 8.9:1, PTK T76, Turbosmart 40 BC & 45 WG, Tial 40 BV, AFR 205s 310/245, 228/228 550/550 114 Hydro, 1.7rr, Isky RLs, 4" HKS exhaust, ARC 30x16x4 IC, 8 point cage, C2 gauges, 2 step, C4 3200 stall w/ R Manual & Hurst Ratchet shifter, 17" Panasport G7s, CSU 750 & bonnet, Vic Jr intake, 3.63 gears, Corbeau Carrera seats, Custom wide body, Bomex side skirts and rear 1/4 caps, Tommy Kaira bumper.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Performance


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts