-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Colorado
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-13-2005, 12:53 AM
57JagXKSS 57JagXKSS is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?

The Trailblazer comes with this I-6 so why not the Colorado?



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2005, 12:57 AM
57JagXKSS 57JagXKSS is offline
Banned
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Vortec 4200 I-6:

4.2 DOHC I-6 has 275 hp at 6,000 rpm and 275 lb-ft of torque at 3,600 rpm.

The Vortec 4200 I-6 has been one of Ward's ten best engines since 2002.

http://www.theautochannel.com/F/news...15/304690.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2005, 01:05 AM
57JagXKSS 57JagXKSS is offline
Banned
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
from chevyhiperformance.com

"To increase casting accuracy and minimize engine weight, the aluminum block and cylinder head of the Vortec 4200 I6 are made using a “lost foam” process. This casting technology provides both improved control of the manufacturing process and allows direct-mounted accessories that reduce vibration and weight. With the exception of the power-steering pump bracket, all engine accessories bolt directly to the engine."



"
One of the most interesting aspects of the Vortec 4200 I6 is what’s called variable-valve exhaust timing. This feature adjusts the exhaust camshaft timing within a range of 25 degrees as engine operating conditions change. To do that, an onboard computer first collects several points of data including throttle position, engine load, and vehicle speed. From there, a control valve adds or removes oil from a cavity and piston chamber (see cutaway photo) at the front of the camshaft. Thus, advancing or retarding the exhaust camshaft not only enhances the torque curve, but also improves idle quality and reduces emissions. With the ability to change timing, a more aggressive camshaft profile can also be used."

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2005, 06:20 PM
IFIXCARZ4U IFIXCARZ4U is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mostly due to the fact it won't fit there is barely room for the I-5 engine much less adding another 6" to the front of the engine
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-14-2005, 06:20 PM
IFIXCARZ4U IFIXCARZ4U is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mostly due to the fact it won't fit there is barely room for the I-5 engine much less adding another 6" to the front of the engine
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-14-2005, 08:22 PM
57JagXKSS 57JagXKSS is offline
Banned
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
really?

does anyone have pics of the Colorado's engine bay?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-15-2005, 08:49 AM
Vettribution Vettribution is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Vettribution Send a message via Yahoo to Vettribution
Re: Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?

Yes, really... You could fit a v8 in there,or a v6.... but the i-6 will not fit.
__________________
New Vehicle & Project:
04' ZQ8 Chevrolet Colorado, Shortbed Regular Cab I-5. (Victory Red)
Best Dyno: 8.5 psi...390 HP & 430 lbs ft TQ.
Major Mod: Garrett GT35R Turbo...
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/811544.

Please... Come get some.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-16-2005, 11:50 PM
57JagXKSS 57JagXKSS is offline
Banned
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Won't GM redesign the engine bay so that a 4.2 I-6 will fit?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:55 PM
Vettribution Vettribution is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Vettribution Send a message via Yahoo to Vettribution
Re: Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?

Most likely wont happen.. or they would have done it in the first place. The engine bay just isnt that long.. but it is wide enough for more engine.. Which is why you could fit the V8
__________________
New Vehicle & Project:
04' ZQ8 Chevrolet Colorado, Shortbed Regular Cab I-5. (Victory Red)
Best Dyno: 8.5 psi...390 HP & 430 lbs ft TQ.
Major Mod: Garrett GT35R Turbo...
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/811544.

Please... Come get some.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-14-2005, 08:18 PM
Jaguar D-Type Jaguar D-Type is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think GM should redesign it to fit the I-6.


Last edited by Jaguar D-Type; 09-18-2005 at 04:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-28-2005, 09:48 PM
Jaguar D-Type Jaguar D-Type is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Vortec 4200 six–cylinder engine now generates 291 hp in the 2006 Trailblazer at 6000 rpm and 277 lb.–ft. of torque at 3600 rpm. 90 percent of the torque is available from 1600 rpm to 5600 rpm.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:19 AM
Jaguar D-Type Jaguar D-Type is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-17-2005, 04:20 PM
Jaguar D-Type Jaguar D-Type is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anyone else?
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Colorado


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts