-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Audio
Register FAQ Community
Car Audio Do you live in your car? Then you need to be able to listen to some high-quality music.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:30 AM
Powerefx Powerefx is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 284
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SX to SE Comparison

I was wondering if the SX had better overall SQL than the SE series from RE. Or does its just get louder for SPL and carry less SQ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2005, 12:19 PM
ngsm13's Avatar
ngsm13 ngsm13 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to ngsm13
Re: SX to SE Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerefx
I was wondering if the SX had better overall SQL than the SE series from RE. Or does its just get louder for SPL and carry less SQ?
Well...the SE is supposed to be their entry level SQ woofer...while the SX is supposed to be their entry level SPL woofer. SO, in all honesty...I know you'll hate hearing this...but it's install dependant. There will not be a night and day difference in the SQ b/w the two. So, one may lean a little one way or the other. peace

NG
__________________
I design custom enclosures!
And...my sig is short!
Oh and.. YOU suck balls...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2005, 04:40 PM
bumpinstang77's Avatar
bumpinstang77 bumpinstang77 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to bumpinstang77
Re: SX to SE Comparison

RE claims that the SX can have just as good of SQ as the SE, but like NG said that's purely install dependant..... the SX will get hella louder in w/e application tho!!
__________________
2002 Ford Explorer Limited
D31 yellow top
Kenwood DDX-7017
2 Ascendant Audio Avalanche 18's
13 cuft NET ported box tuned to 27hz
Autotek Mean Machine MX3000.1
Ascendant Audio Arco component set
Orion 275SX (Mids)
PPI Art Series A200 (tweets)
Poly Mids for rear fill to come soon.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2005, 05:20 PM
CBFryman's Avatar
CBFryman CBFryman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,705
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to CBFryman Send a message via Yahoo to CBFryman
Re: SX to SE Comparison

what are you talking about, the RE ownz.... and actually the 8's are pretty damn good for hte price...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2005, 06:12 PM
bumpinstang77's Avatar
bumpinstang77 bumpinstang77 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to bumpinstang77
Re: SX to SE Comparison

wtf are u talking about?
__________________
2002 Ford Explorer Limited
D31 yellow top
Kenwood DDX-7017
2 Ascendant Audio Avalanche 18's
13 cuft NET ported box tuned to 27hz
Autotek Mean Machine MX3000.1
Ascendant Audio Arco component set
Orion 275SX (Mids)
PPI Art Series A200 (tweets)
Poly Mids for rear fill to come soon.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:08 PM
Powerefx Powerefx is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 284
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: SX to SE Comparison

so would the SX be ported like the SES, or should it be sealed for better sq?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:34 PM
ngsm13's Avatar
ngsm13 ngsm13 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to ngsm13
Re: Re: SX to SE Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerefx
so would the SX be ported like the SES, or should it be sealed for better sq?
I'll never go back to sealed...maybe till i become an EXTREME sq nerd...

But I've fallen in love with ported tuned low, like 29-33hz or so. peace

NG
__________________
I design custom enclosures!
And...my sig is short!
Oh and.. YOU suck balls...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:45 PM
AndonD454's Avatar
AndonD454 AndonD454 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 577
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to AndonD454
Re: SX to SE Comparison

SXs = ported.. do it.. youll be glad you did.
__________________
1996 Explorer 4.0 V6 4x4

Sold all my shit.

waiting for more money
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-11-2005, 01:31 AM
ngsm13's Avatar
ngsm13 ngsm13 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to ngsm13
Re: Re: SX to SE Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndonD454
SXs = ported.. do it.. youll be glad you did.
How do you know

NG
__________________
I design custom enclosures!
And...my sig is short!
Oh and.. YOU suck balls...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2005, 04:15 PM
AndonD454's Avatar
AndonD454 AndonD454 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 577
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to AndonD454
Re: SX to SE Comparison

haha good point ill admit i havent heard the sub.. but how many sealed SX installs have you seen? and if your speanding that much more on the sub to get more SPL why wouldnt you>? it would suck to be disappointing if you didnt hear the output you wanted after you spent a day in the shop building a sealed box. and also the t/s params of the sub suit it much better for a ported box for the flatest responce curve(according to winisd anyways)

besides if you were that into SQ you probably wouldnt buy an SX anyways.. so odds are youll be looking for SQL and ported thi ssub will give that.

now give me that many reasons why he would be better off sealed. edge on SQ, more power handling, easier to build??

i still say ported.. regardless of whether or not ive installed 20 SXs or not
__________________
1996 Explorer 4.0 V6 4x4

Sold all my shit.

waiting for more money
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Audio


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts